Cargando…

Decision-making in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine

The most common site of injury to the spine is the thoracolumbar junction which is the mechanical transition junction between the rigid thoracic and the more flexible lumbar spine. The lumbar spine is another site which is more prone to injury. Absence of stabilizing articulations with the ribs, lor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heary, Robert F, Kumar, Sanjeev
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21139777
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.36986
_version_ 1782192361830350848
author Heary, Robert F
Kumar, Sanjeev
author_facet Heary, Robert F
Kumar, Sanjeev
author_sort Heary, Robert F
collection PubMed
description The most common site of injury to the spine is the thoracolumbar junction which is the mechanical transition junction between the rigid thoracic and the more flexible lumbar spine. The lumbar spine is another site which is more prone to injury. Absence of stabilizing articulations with the ribs, lordotic posture and more sagitally oriented facet joints are the most obvious explanations. Burst fractures of the spine account for 14% of all spinal injuries. Though common, thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures present a number of important treatment challenges. There has been substantial controversy related to the indications for nonoperative or operative management of these fractures. Disagreement also exists regarding the choice of the surgical approach. A large number of thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures can be treated conservatively while some fractures require surgery. Selecting an appropriate surgical option requires an in-depth understanding of the different methods of decompression, stabilization and/or fusion. Anterior surgery has the advantage of the greatest degree of canal decompression and offers the benefit of limiting the number of motion segments fused. These advantages come at the added cost of increased time for the surgery and the related morbidity of the surgical approach. Posterior surgery enjoys the advantage of being more familiar to the operating surgeons and can be an effective approach. However, the limitations of this approach include inadequate decompression, recurrence of the deformity and implant failure. Though many of the principles are the same, the treatment of low lumbar burst fractures requires some additional consideration due to the difficulty of approaching this region anteriorly. Avoiding complications of these surgeries are another important aspect and can be achieved by following an algorithmic approach to patient assessment, proper radiological examination and precision in decision-making regarding management. A detailed understanding of the mechanism of injury and their unique biomechanical propensities following various forms of treatment can help the spinal surgeon manage such patients effectively and prevent devastating complications.
format Text
id pubmed-2989512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29895122010-12-07 Decision-making in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine Heary, Robert F Kumar, Sanjeev Indian J Orthop Review Article The most common site of injury to the spine is the thoracolumbar junction which is the mechanical transition junction between the rigid thoracic and the more flexible lumbar spine. The lumbar spine is another site which is more prone to injury. Absence of stabilizing articulations with the ribs, lordotic posture and more sagitally oriented facet joints are the most obvious explanations. Burst fractures of the spine account for 14% of all spinal injuries. Though common, thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures present a number of important treatment challenges. There has been substantial controversy related to the indications for nonoperative or operative management of these fractures. Disagreement also exists regarding the choice of the surgical approach. A large number of thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures can be treated conservatively while some fractures require surgery. Selecting an appropriate surgical option requires an in-depth understanding of the different methods of decompression, stabilization and/or fusion. Anterior surgery has the advantage of the greatest degree of canal decompression and offers the benefit of limiting the number of motion segments fused. These advantages come at the added cost of increased time for the surgery and the related morbidity of the surgical approach. Posterior surgery enjoys the advantage of being more familiar to the operating surgeons and can be an effective approach. However, the limitations of this approach include inadequate decompression, recurrence of the deformity and implant failure. Though many of the principles are the same, the treatment of low lumbar burst fractures requires some additional consideration due to the difficulty of approaching this region anteriorly. Avoiding complications of these surgeries are another important aspect and can be achieved by following an algorithmic approach to patient assessment, proper radiological examination and precision in decision-making regarding management. A detailed understanding of the mechanism of injury and their unique biomechanical propensities following various forms of treatment can help the spinal surgeon manage such patients effectively and prevent devastating complications. Medknow Publications 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC2989512/ /pubmed/21139777 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.36986 Text en © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Heary, Robert F
Kumar, Sanjeev
Decision-making in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine
title Decision-making in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine
title_full Decision-making in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine
title_fullStr Decision-making in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine
title_full_unstemmed Decision-making in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine
title_short Decision-making in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine
title_sort decision-making in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21139777
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.36986
work_keys_str_mv AT hearyrobertf decisionmakinginburstfracturesofthethoracolumbarandlumbarspine
AT kumarsanjeev decisionmakinginburstfracturesofthethoracolumbarandlumbarspine