Cargando…

Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas?

Prognosis of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) strongly correlates with tumor grade as determined by Nottingham combined histologic grade. While reporting grade as low grade/favorable (G1), intermediate grade/moderately favorable (G2), and high grade/unfavorable (G3) is recommended by American Joint C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Purdom, Mathew, Cibull, Michael L., Stratton, Terry D., Samayoa, Luis M., Romond, Edward H., Mcgrath, Patrick C., Karabakhtsian, Rouzan G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151541
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/825627
_version_ 1782192377596739584
author Purdom, Mathew
Cibull, Michael L.
Stratton, Terry D.
Samayoa, Luis M.
Romond, Edward H.
Mcgrath, Patrick C.
Karabakhtsian, Rouzan G.
author_facet Purdom, Mathew
Cibull, Michael L.
Stratton, Terry D.
Samayoa, Luis M.
Romond, Edward H.
Mcgrath, Patrick C.
Karabakhtsian, Rouzan G.
author_sort Purdom, Mathew
collection PubMed
description Prognosis of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) strongly correlates with tumor grade as determined by Nottingham combined histologic grade. While reporting grade as low grade/favorable (G1), intermediate grade/moderately favorable (G2), and high grade/unfavorable (G3) is recommended by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, existing TNM (Primary Tumor/Regional Lymph Nodes/Distant Metastasis) classification does not directly incorporate these data. For large tumors (T3, T4), significance of histologic grade may be clinically moot as those are nearly always candidates for adjuvant therapy. However, for small (T1, T2) node-negative (N0) tumors, grade may be clinically relevant in influencing treatment decisions, but data on outcomes are sparse and controversial. This retrospective study analyzes clinical outcome in patients with small N0 IDC on the basis of tumor grade. Our results suggest that the grade does not impact clinical outcome in T1N0 tumors. In T2N0 tumors, however, it might be prognostically significant and relevant in influencing decisions regarding the need for additional adjuvant therapy and optimal management.
format Text
id pubmed-2989652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29896522010-12-13 Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas? Purdom, Mathew Cibull, Michael L. Stratton, Terry D. Samayoa, Luis M. Romond, Edward H. Mcgrath, Patrick C. Karabakhtsian, Rouzan G. Patholog Res Int Research Article Prognosis of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) strongly correlates with tumor grade as determined by Nottingham combined histologic grade. While reporting grade as low grade/favorable (G1), intermediate grade/moderately favorable (G2), and high grade/unfavorable (G3) is recommended by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, existing TNM (Primary Tumor/Regional Lymph Nodes/Distant Metastasis) classification does not directly incorporate these data. For large tumors (T3, T4), significance of histologic grade may be clinically moot as those are nearly always candidates for adjuvant therapy. However, for small (T1, T2) node-negative (N0) tumors, grade may be clinically relevant in influencing treatment decisions, but data on outcomes are sparse and controversial. This retrospective study analyzes clinical outcome in patients with small N0 IDC on the basis of tumor grade. Our results suggest that the grade does not impact clinical outcome in T1N0 tumors. In T2N0 tumors, however, it might be prognostically significant and relevant in influencing decisions regarding the need for additional adjuvant therapy and optimal management. SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research 2010-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2989652/ /pubmed/21151541 http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/825627 Text en Copyright © 2011 Mathew Purdom et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Purdom, Mathew
Cibull, Michael L.
Stratton, Terry D.
Samayoa, Luis M.
Romond, Edward H.
Mcgrath, Patrick C.
Karabakhtsian, Rouzan G.
Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas?
title Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas?
title_full Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas?
title_fullStr Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas?
title_full_unstemmed Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas?
title_short Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas?
title_sort should histologic grade be incorporated into the tnm classification system for small (t1, t2) node-negative breast adenocarcinomas?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151541
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/825627
work_keys_str_mv AT purdommathew shouldhistologicgradebeincorporatedintothetnmclassificationsystemforsmallt1t2nodenegativebreastadenocarcinomas
AT cibullmichaell shouldhistologicgradebeincorporatedintothetnmclassificationsystemforsmallt1t2nodenegativebreastadenocarcinomas
AT strattonterryd shouldhistologicgradebeincorporatedintothetnmclassificationsystemforsmallt1t2nodenegativebreastadenocarcinomas
AT samayoaluism shouldhistologicgradebeincorporatedintothetnmclassificationsystemforsmallt1t2nodenegativebreastadenocarcinomas
AT romondedwardh shouldhistologicgradebeincorporatedintothetnmclassificationsystemforsmallt1t2nodenegativebreastadenocarcinomas
AT mcgrathpatrickc shouldhistologicgradebeincorporatedintothetnmclassificationsystemforsmallt1t2nodenegativebreastadenocarcinomas
AT karabakhtsianrouzang shouldhistologicgradebeincorporatedintothetnmclassificationsystemforsmallt1t2nodenegativebreastadenocarcinomas