Cargando…
Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas?
Prognosis of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) strongly correlates with tumor grade as determined by Nottingham combined histologic grade. While reporting grade as low grade/favorable (G1), intermediate grade/moderately favorable (G2), and high grade/unfavorable (G3) is recommended by American Joint C...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151541 http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/825627 |
_version_ | 1782192377596739584 |
---|---|
author | Purdom, Mathew Cibull, Michael L. Stratton, Terry D. Samayoa, Luis M. Romond, Edward H. Mcgrath, Patrick C. Karabakhtsian, Rouzan G. |
author_facet | Purdom, Mathew Cibull, Michael L. Stratton, Terry D. Samayoa, Luis M. Romond, Edward H. Mcgrath, Patrick C. Karabakhtsian, Rouzan G. |
author_sort | Purdom, Mathew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prognosis of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) strongly correlates with tumor grade as determined by Nottingham combined histologic grade. While reporting grade as low grade/favorable (G1), intermediate grade/moderately favorable (G2), and high grade/unfavorable (G3) is recommended by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, existing TNM (Primary Tumor/Regional Lymph Nodes/Distant Metastasis) classification does not directly incorporate these data. For large tumors (T3, T4), significance of histologic grade may be clinically moot as those are nearly always candidates for adjuvant therapy. However, for small (T1, T2) node-negative (N0) tumors, grade may be clinically relevant in influencing treatment decisions, but data on outcomes are sparse and controversial. This retrospective study analyzes clinical outcome in patients with small N0 IDC on the basis of tumor grade. Our results suggest that the grade does not impact clinical outcome in T1N0 tumors. In T2N0 tumors, however, it might be prognostically significant and relevant in influencing decisions regarding the need for additional adjuvant therapy and optimal management. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2989652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29896522010-12-13 Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas? Purdom, Mathew Cibull, Michael L. Stratton, Terry D. Samayoa, Luis M. Romond, Edward H. Mcgrath, Patrick C. Karabakhtsian, Rouzan G. Patholog Res Int Research Article Prognosis of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) strongly correlates with tumor grade as determined by Nottingham combined histologic grade. While reporting grade as low grade/favorable (G1), intermediate grade/moderately favorable (G2), and high grade/unfavorable (G3) is recommended by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, existing TNM (Primary Tumor/Regional Lymph Nodes/Distant Metastasis) classification does not directly incorporate these data. For large tumors (T3, T4), significance of histologic grade may be clinically moot as those are nearly always candidates for adjuvant therapy. However, for small (T1, T2) node-negative (N0) tumors, grade may be clinically relevant in influencing treatment decisions, but data on outcomes are sparse and controversial. This retrospective study analyzes clinical outcome in patients with small N0 IDC on the basis of tumor grade. Our results suggest that the grade does not impact clinical outcome in T1N0 tumors. In T2N0 tumors, however, it might be prognostically significant and relevant in influencing decisions regarding the need for additional adjuvant therapy and optimal management. SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research 2010-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2989652/ /pubmed/21151541 http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/825627 Text en Copyright © 2011 Mathew Purdom et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Purdom, Mathew Cibull, Michael L. Stratton, Terry D. Samayoa, Luis M. Romond, Edward H. Mcgrath, Patrick C. Karabakhtsian, Rouzan G. Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas? |
title | Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas? |
title_full | Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas? |
title_fullStr | Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas? |
title_full_unstemmed | Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas? |
title_short | Should Histologic Grade Be Incorporated into the TNM Classification System for Small (T1, T2) Node-Negative Breast Adenocarcinomas? |
title_sort | should histologic grade be incorporated into the tnm classification system for small (t1, t2) node-negative breast adenocarcinomas? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151541 http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/825627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT purdommathew shouldhistologicgradebeincorporatedintothetnmclassificationsystemforsmallt1t2nodenegativebreastadenocarcinomas AT cibullmichaell shouldhistologicgradebeincorporatedintothetnmclassificationsystemforsmallt1t2nodenegativebreastadenocarcinomas AT strattonterryd shouldhistologicgradebeincorporatedintothetnmclassificationsystemforsmallt1t2nodenegativebreastadenocarcinomas AT samayoaluism shouldhistologicgradebeincorporatedintothetnmclassificationsystemforsmallt1t2nodenegativebreastadenocarcinomas AT romondedwardh shouldhistologicgradebeincorporatedintothetnmclassificationsystemforsmallt1t2nodenegativebreastadenocarcinomas AT mcgrathpatrickc shouldhistologicgradebeincorporatedintothetnmclassificationsystemforsmallt1t2nodenegativebreastadenocarcinomas AT karabakhtsianrouzang shouldhistologicgradebeincorporatedintothetnmclassificationsystemforsmallt1t2nodenegativebreastadenocarcinomas |