Cargando…

Two-stage, self-cycling process for the production of bacteriophages

BACKGROUND: A two-stage, self-cycling process for the production of bacteriophages was developed. The first stage, containing only the uninfected host bacterium, was operated under self-cycling fermentation (SCF) conditions. This automated method, using the derivative of the carbon dioxide evolution...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sauvageau, Dominic, Cooper, David G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-81
_version_ 1782192411253932032
author Sauvageau, Dominic
Cooper, David G
author_facet Sauvageau, Dominic
Cooper, David G
author_sort Sauvageau, Dominic
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A two-stage, self-cycling process for the production of bacteriophages was developed. The first stage, containing only the uninfected host bacterium, was operated under self-cycling fermentation (SCF) conditions. This automated method, using the derivative of the carbon dioxide evolution rate (CER) as the control parameter, led to the synchronization of the host bacterium. The second stage, containing both the host and the phage, was operated using self-cycling infection (SCI) with CER and CER-derived data as the control parameters. When each infection cycle was terminated, phages were harvested and a new infection cycle was initiated by adding host cells from the SCF (first stage). This was augmented with fresh medium and the small amount of phages left from the previous cycle initiated the next infection cycle. Both stages were operated independently, except for this short period of time when the SCF harvest was added to the SCI to initiate the next cycle. RESULTS: It was demonstrated that this mode of operation resulted in stable infection cycles if the growth of the host cells in the SCF was synchronized. The final phage titers obtained were reproducible among cycles and were as good as those obtained in batch productions performed under the same conditions (medium, temperature, initial multiplicity of infection, etc.). Moreover, phages obtained in different cycles showed no important difference in infectivity. Finally, it was shown that cell synchronization of the host cells in the first stage (SCF) not only maintained the volumetric productivity (phages per volume) but also led to higher specific productivity (phage per cell per hour) in the second stage (SCI). CONCLUSIONS: Production of bacteriophage T4 in the semi-continuous, automated SCF/SCI system was efficient and reproducible from cycle to cycle. Synchronization of the host in the first stage prior to infection led to improvements in the specific productivity of phages in the second stage while maintaining the volumetric productivity. These results demonstrate the significant potential of this approach for both upstream and downstream process optimization.
format Text
id pubmed-2989940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29899402010-11-23 Two-stage, self-cycling process for the production of bacteriophages Sauvageau, Dominic Cooper, David G Microb Cell Fact Research BACKGROUND: A two-stage, self-cycling process for the production of bacteriophages was developed. The first stage, containing only the uninfected host bacterium, was operated under self-cycling fermentation (SCF) conditions. This automated method, using the derivative of the carbon dioxide evolution rate (CER) as the control parameter, led to the synchronization of the host bacterium. The second stage, containing both the host and the phage, was operated using self-cycling infection (SCI) with CER and CER-derived data as the control parameters. When each infection cycle was terminated, phages were harvested and a new infection cycle was initiated by adding host cells from the SCF (first stage). This was augmented with fresh medium and the small amount of phages left from the previous cycle initiated the next infection cycle. Both stages were operated independently, except for this short period of time when the SCF harvest was added to the SCI to initiate the next cycle. RESULTS: It was demonstrated that this mode of operation resulted in stable infection cycles if the growth of the host cells in the SCF was synchronized. The final phage titers obtained were reproducible among cycles and were as good as those obtained in batch productions performed under the same conditions (medium, temperature, initial multiplicity of infection, etc.). Moreover, phages obtained in different cycles showed no important difference in infectivity. Finally, it was shown that cell synchronization of the host cells in the first stage (SCF) not only maintained the volumetric productivity (phages per volume) but also led to higher specific productivity (phage per cell per hour) in the second stage (SCI). CONCLUSIONS: Production of bacteriophage T4 in the semi-continuous, automated SCF/SCI system was efficient and reproducible from cycle to cycle. Synchronization of the host in the first stage prior to infection led to improvements in the specific productivity of phages in the second stage while maintaining the volumetric productivity. These results demonstrate the significant potential of this approach for both upstream and downstream process optimization. BioMed Central 2010-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2989940/ /pubmed/21040541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-81 Text en Copyright ©2010 Sauvageau and Cooper; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Sauvageau, Dominic
Cooper, David G
Two-stage, self-cycling process for the production of bacteriophages
title Two-stage, self-cycling process for the production of bacteriophages
title_full Two-stage, self-cycling process for the production of bacteriophages
title_fullStr Two-stage, self-cycling process for the production of bacteriophages
title_full_unstemmed Two-stage, self-cycling process for the production of bacteriophages
title_short Two-stage, self-cycling process for the production of bacteriophages
title_sort two-stage, self-cycling process for the production of bacteriophages
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-81
work_keys_str_mv AT sauvageaudominic twostageselfcyclingprocessfortheproductionofbacteriophages
AT cooperdavidg twostageselfcyclingprocessfortheproductionofbacteriophages