Cargando…

Effect of smoking status on total energy expenditure

Individuals who smoke generally have a lower body mass index (BMI) than nonsmokers. The relative roles of energy expenditure and energy intake in maintaining the lower BMI, however, remain controversial. We tested the hypothesis that current smokers have higher total energy expenditure than never sm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradley, David P, Johnson, Lindsey A, Zhang, Zhumin, Subar, Amy F, Troiano, Richard P, Schatzkin, Arthur, Schoeller, Dale A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-7-81
_version_ 1782192420211916800
author Bradley, David P
Johnson, Lindsey A
Zhang, Zhumin
Subar, Amy F
Troiano, Richard P
Schatzkin, Arthur
Schoeller, Dale A
author_facet Bradley, David P
Johnson, Lindsey A
Zhang, Zhumin
Subar, Amy F
Troiano, Richard P
Schatzkin, Arthur
Schoeller, Dale A
author_sort Bradley, David P
collection PubMed
description Individuals who smoke generally have a lower body mass index (BMI) than nonsmokers. The relative roles of energy expenditure and energy intake in maintaining the lower BMI, however, remain controversial. We tested the hypothesis that current smokers have higher total energy expenditure than never smokers in 308 adults aged 40-69 years old of which 47 were current smokers. Energy expenditure was measured by doubly labeled water during a two week period in which the subjects lived at home and performed their normal activities. Smoking status was determined by questionnaire. There were no significant differences in mean BMI (mean ± SD) between smokers and never smokers for either males (27.8+5.1 kg/m(2 )vs. 27.5+4.0 kg/m(2)) or females (26.5+5.3 kg/m(2 )vs. 28.1+6.6 kg/m(2)), although the difference in females was of similar magnitude to previous reports. Similarly, total energy expenditure of male smokers (3069+764 kcal/d) was not significantly different from that of never smokers (2854+468 kcal/d), and that of female smokers (2266+387 kcal/d) was not different from that of never smokers (2330+415 kcal/d). These findings did not change after adjustment for age, fat-free mass and self-reported physical activity. Using doubly labeled water, we found no evidence of increased energy expenditure among smokers, however, it should be noted that BMI differences in this cohort also did not differ by smoking status.
format Text
id pubmed-2989978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29899782010-11-23 Effect of smoking status on total energy expenditure Bradley, David P Johnson, Lindsey A Zhang, Zhumin Subar, Amy F Troiano, Richard P Schatzkin, Arthur Schoeller, Dale A Nutr Metab (Lond) Research Individuals who smoke generally have a lower body mass index (BMI) than nonsmokers. The relative roles of energy expenditure and energy intake in maintaining the lower BMI, however, remain controversial. We tested the hypothesis that current smokers have higher total energy expenditure than never smokers in 308 adults aged 40-69 years old of which 47 were current smokers. Energy expenditure was measured by doubly labeled water during a two week period in which the subjects lived at home and performed their normal activities. Smoking status was determined by questionnaire. There were no significant differences in mean BMI (mean ± SD) between smokers and never smokers for either males (27.8+5.1 kg/m(2 )vs. 27.5+4.0 kg/m(2)) or females (26.5+5.3 kg/m(2 )vs. 28.1+6.6 kg/m(2)), although the difference in females was of similar magnitude to previous reports. Similarly, total energy expenditure of male smokers (3069+764 kcal/d) was not significantly different from that of never smokers (2854+468 kcal/d), and that of female smokers (2266+387 kcal/d) was not different from that of never smokers (2330+415 kcal/d). These findings did not change after adjustment for age, fat-free mass and self-reported physical activity. Using doubly labeled water, we found no evidence of increased energy expenditure among smokers, however, it should be noted that BMI differences in this cohort also did not differ by smoking status. BioMed Central 2010-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2989978/ /pubmed/21040542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-7-81 Text en Copyright ©2010 Bradley et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Bradley, David P
Johnson, Lindsey A
Zhang, Zhumin
Subar, Amy F
Troiano, Richard P
Schatzkin, Arthur
Schoeller, Dale A
Effect of smoking status on total energy expenditure
title Effect of smoking status on total energy expenditure
title_full Effect of smoking status on total energy expenditure
title_fullStr Effect of smoking status on total energy expenditure
title_full_unstemmed Effect of smoking status on total energy expenditure
title_short Effect of smoking status on total energy expenditure
title_sort effect of smoking status on total energy expenditure
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-7-81
work_keys_str_mv AT bradleydavidp effectofsmokingstatusontotalenergyexpenditure
AT johnsonlindseya effectofsmokingstatusontotalenergyexpenditure
AT zhangzhumin effectofsmokingstatusontotalenergyexpenditure
AT subaramyf effectofsmokingstatusontotalenergyexpenditure
AT troianorichardp effectofsmokingstatusontotalenergyexpenditure
AT schatzkinarthur effectofsmokingstatusontotalenergyexpenditure
AT schoellerdalea effectofsmokingstatusontotalenergyexpenditure