Cargando…

Effect of various physical parameters on surface and build-up dose for 15-MV X-rays

The purpose of this study was to find out the effect of various physical parameters on the skin and build-up doses of 15-MV photon beams. The effects of field dimensions, acrylic shadow tray, focus to-skin distance (FSD) on surface and buildup dose were determined for open, motorized 60° wedge (MW)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yadav, Girigesh, Yadav, R. S., Kumar, Alok
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21170184
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.71761
_version_ 1782192439933534208
author Yadav, Girigesh
Yadav, R. S.
Kumar, Alok
author_facet Yadav, Girigesh
Yadav, R. S.
Kumar, Alok
author_sort Yadav, Girigesh
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to find out the effect of various physical parameters on the skin and build-up doses of 15-MV photon beams. The effects of field dimensions, acrylic shadow tray, focus to-skin distance (FSD) on surface and buildup dose were determined for open, motorized 60° wedge (MW) and blocked fields. A ‘Markus’ plane parallel plate chamber was used for these measurements in an Elekta (6–15MV) linear accelerator. The surface dose for MW fields was lower than the dose for an open field, but the trend reversed for large fields and higher degree wedges. With the use of an acrylic shadow tray, the surface dose increased for all field sizes, but the increase was dominant for large fields. The surface dose for blocked fields was lower than the dose for open fields. The percentage depth dose of 10 × 10 cm(2) field at surface (PDD(0)) for open beam were 13.89%, 11.71%, and 10.74% at 80 cm, 100 cm, and 120 cm FSD, respectively. The blocking tray increased PDD(0) of 10 × 10 cm(2) field to 26.29%, 14.01%, and 11.53%, while the motorized 60° wedge decreased PDD(0) to 11.32%, 9.7%, and 8.9 % at these FSDs. The maximum PDD difference seen at surface (i.e., skin) for 5 × 5 cm(2), 15 × 15 cm(2), and 30 × 30 cm(2) are 0.5%, 4.6%, and 5.6% for open field and 0.9%, 4.7%, and 7.2% for motorized 60° wedge field, when FSDs varied from 80 cm to 120 cm. The maximum PDD difference seen at surface for 5 × 5 cm(2), 15 × 15 cm(2), and 30 × 30 cm(2) fields are 5.6%, 22.8%, and 29.6%, respectively, for a 1.0-cm perspex-blocking tray as the FSD is changed. The maximum PDD difference was seen at the surface (i.e., skin) and this decreased with increasing depth.
format Text
id pubmed-2990114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29901142010-12-17 Effect of various physical parameters on surface and build-up dose for 15-MV X-rays Yadav, Girigesh Yadav, R. S. Kumar, Alok J Med Phys Original Article The purpose of this study was to find out the effect of various physical parameters on the skin and build-up doses of 15-MV photon beams. The effects of field dimensions, acrylic shadow tray, focus to-skin distance (FSD) on surface and buildup dose were determined for open, motorized 60° wedge (MW) and blocked fields. A ‘Markus’ plane parallel plate chamber was used for these measurements in an Elekta (6–15MV) linear accelerator. The surface dose for MW fields was lower than the dose for an open field, but the trend reversed for large fields and higher degree wedges. With the use of an acrylic shadow tray, the surface dose increased for all field sizes, but the increase was dominant for large fields. The surface dose for blocked fields was lower than the dose for open fields. The percentage depth dose of 10 × 10 cm(2) field at surface (PDD(0)) for open beam were 13.89%, 11.71%, and 10.74% at 80 cm, 100 cm, and 120 cm FSD, respectively. The blocking tray increased PDD(0) of 10 × 10 cm(2) field to 26.29%, 14.01%, and 11.53%, while the motorized 60° wedge decreased PDD(0) to 11.32%, 9.7%, and 8.9 % at these FSDs. The maximum PDD difference seen at surface (i.e., skin) for 5 × 5 cm(2), 15 × 15 cm(2), and 30 × 30 cm(2) are 0.5%, 4.6%, and 5.6% for open field and 0.9%, 4.7%, and 7.2% for motorized 60° wedge field, when FSDs varied from 80 cm to 120 cm. The maximum PDD difference seen at surface for 5 × 5 cm(2), 15 × 15 cm(2), and 30 × 30 cm(2) fields are 5.6%, 22.8%, and 29.6%, respectively, for a 1.0-cm perspex-blocking tray as the FSD is changed. The maximum PDD difference was seen at the surface (i.e., skin) and this decreased with increasing depth. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2990114/ /pubmed/21170184 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.71761 Text en © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yadav, Girigesh
Yadav, R. S.
Kumar, Alok
Effect of various physical parameters on surface and build-up dose for 15-MV X-rays
title Effect of various physical parameters on surface and build-up dose for 15-MV X-rays
title_full Effect of various physical parameters on surface and build-up dose for 15-MV X-rays
title_fullStr Effect of various physical parameters on surface and build-up dose for 15-MV X-rays
title_full_unstemmed Effect of various physical parameters on surface and build-up dose for 15-MV X-rays
title_short Effect of various physical parameters on surface and build-up dose for 15-MV X-rays
title_sort effect of various physical parameters on surface and build-up dose for 15-mv x-rays
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21170184
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.71761
work_keys_str_mv AT yadavgirigesh effectofvariousphysicalparametersonsurfaceandbuildupdosefor15mvxrays
AT yadavrs effectofvariousphysicalparametersonsurfaceandbuildupdosefor15mvxrays
AT kumaralok effectofvariousphysicalparametersonsurfaceandbuildupdosefor15mvxrays