Cargando…

Comparison of Vinorelbine-Cisplatin with Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE: The objective of this trial was to compare cisplatin-plus-vinorelbine regimen with cisplatin-plus-gemcitabine regimen in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC received either vinoelbine 30 mg/m(2) (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozkaya, Sevket, Findik, Serhat, Uzun, Oguz, Atici, Atilla Guven, Erkan, Levent
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21157519
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The objective of this trial was to compare cisplatin-plus-vinorelbine regimen with cisplatin-plus-gemcitabine regimen in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC received either vinoelbine 30 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1) every 21 days (VC arm) or gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1) every 21 days (GC arm). RESULTS: One hundred thirtyfour patients (67 VC and 67 GC) were included to the study. Overall response rates for the VC arm (31.2%) were not significantly different from that of the GC arm (34.3%). There were no differences in overall survival and one-year survival rates. Median survival and one-year survival rates for the VC and GC groups were 10.6 and 11.5 months, 45% and 46.8%, respectively. Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher on the GC arm (VC 1.4% v GC 8.9%, p < 0.05), as was febrile neutropenia on the VC arm (VC 8.9% v GC 1.4%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: VC and GC demonstrated similar efficacy but there were differences in toxicity profiles.