Cargando…
A simple practical patient-reported clinic satisfaction measure for young adults
BACKGROUND: The development of practical patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) to assess the user view of health programmes is increasingly important. Valid, shorter instruments are more likely to be used and completed than extensive questionnaires. METHODS: Consecutive adult outpatient attendees...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21063420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605923 |
_version_ | 1782192480671760384 |
---|---|
author | Phillips, R Absolom, K Stark, D Glaser, A |
author_facet | Phillips, R Absolom, K Stark, D Glaser, A |
author_sort | Phillips, R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The development of practical patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) to assess the user view of health programmes is increasingly important. Valid, shorter instruments are more likely to be used and completed than extensive questionnaires. METHODS: Consecutive adult outpatient attendees who were long-term survivors of childhood cancer completed the 16-item Patient Satisfaction with Communication Questionnaire (PSCQ). These data were used to develop a three-item questionnaire. The brief PROM was validated against data from a second, independent survey conducted in a similar fashion. RESULTS: In all, 93 individuals contributed PSCQ data, a response rate of 63%. The brief PROM was highly correlated with the original PSCQ in derivation (ρ=0.87, P<0.001) and validation (ρ=0.82, P<0.001) data sets. Using a cutoff of scores <9 to indicate dissatisfaction showed fair discrimination in derivation (sensitivity 85%, specificity 80%) and validation data sets (sensitivity 75%, specificity 78%). CONCLUSION: It is possible to quickly and efficiently assess satisfaction with follow-up clinics with three questions. This brief PROM could prove useful in monitoring services quality by allowing clinic users to provide timely feedback on their care. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2990574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29905742011-11-09 A simple practical patient-reported clinic satisfaction measure for young adults Phillips, R Absolom, K Stark, D Glaser, A Br J Cancer Short Communication BACKGROUND: The development of practical patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) to assess the user view of health programmes is increasingly important. Valid, shorter instruments are more likely to be used and completed than extensive questionnaires. METHODS: Consecutive adult outpatient attendees who were long-term survivors of childhood cancer completed the 16-item Patient Satisfaction with Communication Questionnaire (PSCQ). These data were used to develop a three-item questionnaire. The brief PROM was validated against data from a second, independent survey conducted in a similar fashion. RESULTS: In all, 93 individuals contributed PSCQ data, a response rate of 63%. The brief PROM was highly correlated with the original PSCQ in derivation (ρ=0.87, P<0.001) and validation (ρ=0.82, P<0.001) data sets. Using a cutoff of scores <9 to indicate dissatisfaction showed fair discrimination in derivation (sensitivity 85%, specificity 80%) and validation data sets (sensitivity 75%, specificity 78%). CONCLUSION: It is possible to quickly and efficiently assess satisfaction with follow-up clinics with three questions. This brief PROM could prove useful in monitoring services quality by allowing clinic users to provide timely feedback on their care. Nature Publishing Group 2010-11-09 2010-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2990574/ /pubmed/21063420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605923 Text en Copyright © 2010 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Phillips, R Absolom, K Stark, D Glaser, A A simple practical patient-reported clinic satisfaction measure for young adults |
title | A simple practical patient-reported clinic satisfaction measure for young adults |
title_full | A simple practical patient-reported clinic satisfaction measure for young adults |
title_fullStr | A simple practical patient-reported clinic satisfaction measure for young adults |
title_full_unstemmed | A simple practical patient-reported clinic satisfaction measure for young adults |
title_short | A simple practical patient-reported clinic satisfaction measure for young adults |
title_sort | simple practical patient-reported clinic satisfaction measure for young adults |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21063420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605923 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phillipsr asimplepracticalpatientreportedclinicsatisfactionmeasureforyoungadults AT absolomk asimplepracticalpatientreportedclinicsatisfactionmeasureforyoungadults AT starkd asimplepracticalpatientreportedclinicsatisfactionmeasureforyoungadults AT glasera asimplepracticalpatientreportedclinicsatisfactionmeasureforyoungadults AT phillipsr simplepracticalpatientreportedclinicsatisfactionmeasureforyoungadults AT absolomk simplepracticalpatientreportedclinicsatisfactionmeasureforyoungadults AT starkd simplepracticalpatientreportedclinicsatisfactionmeasureforyoungadults AT glasera simplepracticalpatientreportedclinicsatisfactionmeasureforyoungadults |