Cargando…
Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples
BACKGROUND: Factors affecting the success of short tandem repeat (STR) amplification of poorly preserved samples are generally known, but as of yet, they have seldom been systematically assessed. Using two different maximum likelihood-based methods, the relative importance of DNA quantity, degradati...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-1-9 |
_version_ | 1782192506518110208 |
---|---|
author | Putkonen, Mikko T Palo, Jukka U Cano, Jose M Hedman, Minttu Sajantila, Antti |
author_facet | Putkonen, Mikko T Palo, Jukka U Cano, Jose M Hedman, Minttu Sajantila, Antti |
author_sort | Putkonen, Mikko T |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Factors affecting the success of short tandem repeat (STR) amplification of poorly preserved samples are generally known, but as of yet, they have seldom been systematically assessed. Using two different maximum likelihood-based methods, the relative importance of DNA quantity, degradation and inhibition in STR genotyping was studied with DNA extracts from a set of old bone samples. First, the effects of different factors related to PCR amplification were estimated with a generalized linear mixed model. Second, error rates of allelic drop-out and drop-in were estimated on the basis of the frequency and nature of mismatches between replicates. RESULTS: In autosomal STR analyses, the most important factor was the DNA quantity, followed by the degradation, whereas in Y-chromosomal STR analysis, the most important factor was the degradation. Inhibition was a minor concern in STR analyses of poorly preserved bones. CONCLUSIONS: The success of PCR amplification depends largely on the template DNA quality (amount and degradation), but these problems can be partly compensated for by different primer design and amplification chemistry. Consequently, the relative roles of the compromising factors differ according to the kit used. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2990737 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29907372010-11-24 Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples Putkonen, Mikko T Palo, Jukka U Cano, Jose M Hedman, Minttu Sajantila, Antti Investig Genet Methodology BACKGROUND: Factors affecting the success of short tandem repeat (STR) amplification of poorly preserved samples are generally known, but as of yet, they have seldom been systematically assessed. Using two different maximum likelihood-based methods, the relative importance of DNA quantity, degradation and inhibition in STR genotyping was studied with DNA extracts from a set of old bone samples. First, the effects of different factors related to PCR amplification were estimated with a generalized linear mixed model. Second, error rates of allelic drop-out and drop-in were estimated on the basis of the frequency and nature of mismatches between replicates. RESULTS: In autosomal STR analyses, the most important factor was the DNA quantity, followed by the degradation, whereas in Y-chromosomal STR analysis, the most important factor was the degradation. Inhibition was a minor concern in STR analyses of poorly preserved bones. CONCLUSIONS: The success of PCR amplification depends largely on the template DNA quality (amount and degradation), but these problems can be partly compensated for by different primer design and amplification chemistry. Consequently, the relative roles of the compromising factors differ according to the kit used. BioMed Central 2010-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2990737/ /pubmed/21092342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-1-9 Text en Copyright ©2010 Putkonen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Putkonen, Mikko T Palo, Jukka U Cano, Jose M Hedman, Minttu Sajantila, Antti Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples |
title | Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples |
title_full | Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples |
title_fullStr | Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples |
title_short | Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples |
title_sort | factors affecting the str amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-1-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT putkonenmikkot factorsaffectingthestramplificationsuccessinpoorlypreservedbonesamples AT palojukkau factorsaffectingthestramplificationsuccessinpoorlypreservedbonesamples AT canojosem factorsaffectingthestramplificationsuccessinpoorlypreservedbonesamples AT hedmanminttu factorsaffectingthestramplificationsuccessinpoorlypreservedbonesamples AT sajantilaantti factorsaffectingthestramplificationsuccessinpoorlypreservedbonesamples |