Cargando…

Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples

BACKGROUND: Factors affecting the success of short tandem repeat (STR) amplification of poorly preserved samples are generally known, but as of yet, they have seldom been systematically assessed. Using two different maximum likelihood-based methods, the relative importance of DNA quantity, degradati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Putkonen, Mikko T, Palo, Jukka U, Cano, Jose M, Hedman, Minttu, Sajantila, Antti
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-1-9
_version_ 1782192506518110208
author Putkonen, Mikko T
Palo, Jukka U
Cano, Jose M
Hedman, Minttu
Sajantila, Antti
author_facet Putkonen, Mikko T
Palo, Jukka U
Cano, Jose M
Hedman, Minttu
Sajantila, Antti
author_sort Putkonen, Mikko T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Factors affecting the success of short tandem repeat (STR) amplification of poorly preserved samples are generally known, but as of yet, they have seldom been systematically assessed. Using two different maximum likelihood-based methods, the relative importance of DNA quantity, degradation and inhibition in STR genotyping was studied with DNA extracts from a set of old bone samples. First, the effects of different factors related to PCR amplification were estimated with a generalized linear mixed model. Second, error rates of allelic drop-out and drop-in were estimated on the basis of the frequency and nature of mismatches between replicates. RESULTS: In autosomal STR analyses, the most important factor was the DNA quantity, followed by the degradation, whereas in Y-chromosomal STR analysis, the most important factor was the degradation. Inhibition was a minor concern in STR analyses of poorly preserved bones. CONCLUSIONS: The success of PCR amplification depends largely on the template DNA quality (amount and degradation), but these problems can be partly compensated for by different primer design and amplification chemistry. Consequently, the relative roles of the compromising factors differ according to the kit used.
format Text
id pubmed-2990737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29907372010-11-24 Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples Putkonen, Mikko T Palo, Jukka U Cano, Jose M Hedman, Minttu Sajantila, Antti Investig Genet Methodology BACKGROUND: Factors affecting the success of short tandem repeat (STR) amplification of poorly preserved samples are generally known, but as of yet, they have seldom been systematically assessed. Using two different maximum likelihood-based methods, the relative importance of DNA quantity, degradation and inhibition in STR genotyping was studied with DNA extracts from a set of old bone samples. First, the effects of different factors related to PCR amplification were estimated with a generalized linear mixed model. Second, error rates of allelic drop-out and drop-in were estimated on the basis of the frequency and nature of mismatches between replicates. RESULTS: In autosomal STR analyses, the most important factor was the DNA quantity, followed by the degradation, whereas in Y-chromosomal STR analysis, the most important factor was the degradation. Inhibition was a minor concern in STR analyses of poorly preserved bones. CONCLUSIONS: The success of PCR amplification depends largely on the template DNA quality (amount and degradation), but these problems can be partly compensated for by different primer design and amplification chemistry. Consequently, the relative roles of the compromising factors differ according to the kit used. BioMed Central 2010-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2990737/ /pubmed/21092342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-1-9 Text en Copyright ©2010 Putkonen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Putkonen, Mikko T
Palo, Jukka U
Cano, Jose M
Hedman, Minttu
Sajantila, Antti
Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples
title Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples
title_full Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples
title_fullStr Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples
title_full_unstemmed Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples
title_short Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples
title_sort factors affecting the str amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-1-9
work_keys_str_mv AT putkonenmikkot factorsaffectingthestramplificationsuccessinpoorlypreservedbonesamples
AT palojukkau factorsaffectingthestramplificationsuccessinpoorlypreservedbonesamples
AT canojosem factorsaffectingthestramplificationsuccessinpoorlypreservedbonesamples
AT hedmanminttu factorsaffectingthestramplificationsuccessinpoorlypreservedbonesamples
AT sajantilaantti factorsaffectingthestramplificationsuccessinpoorlypreservedbonesamples