Cargando…

Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization

PURPOSE: Annual US national rates of family physicians providing maternity care are decreasing and rates of cesarean delivery are increasing. Family physicians tend to have lower cesarean delivery rates than obstetrician specialists, but this association is usually explained by an assumed lower pre-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Nicholson, James M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151731
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S9494
_version_ 1782192531581173760
author Nicholson, James M
author_facet Nicholson, James M
author_sort Nicholson, James M
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Annual US national rates of family physicians providing maternity care are decreasing and rates of cesarean delivery are increasing. Family physicians tend to have lower cesarean delivery rates than obstetrician specialists, but this association is usually explained by an assumed lower pre-delivery risk for cesarean delivery. This study was developed to compare the estimated risk of cesarean delivery in patients of the two specialties. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study within an urban teaching hospital compared 100 family- physician treated subjects to 300 subjects treated by obstetrician-specialists. Risk factors for cesarean delivery were identified, and an indirect standardization procedure was used to compare the pre-38 week of gestation risk of cesarean delivery in the two groups. RESULTS: The patients treated by family physicians had a projected pre-38 week of gestation risk of cesarean delivery (17.4%) that was similar to the actual rate of cesarean delivery in the obstetrician-specialist group (16.7%). The Standardized Cesarean Delivery Ratio was 1.04. CONCLUSION: Lower cesarean delivery rates provided by family physicians may not be simply due to case-mix issues. Additional studies comparing the pre-delivery estimation of cesarean delivery risk would be helpful in measuring the relative levels of obstetric risk of patients treated by different maternity-care provider types.
format Text
id pubmed-2990893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29908932010-12-13 Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization Nicholson, James M Int J Womens Health Original Research PURPOSE: Annual US national rates of family physicians providing maternity care are decreasing and rates of cesarean delivery are increasing. Family physicians tend to have lower cesarean delivery rates than obstetrician specialists, but this association is usually explained by an assumed lower pre-delivery risk for cesarean delivery. This study was developed to compare the estimated risk of cesarean delivery in patients of the two specialties. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study within an urban teaching hospital compared 100 family- physician treated subjects to 300 subjects treated by obstetrician-specialists. Risk factors for cesarean delivery were identified, and an indirect standardization procedure was used to compare the pre-38 week of gestation risk of cesarean delivery in the two groups. RESULTS: The patients treated by family physicians had a projected pre-38 week of gestation risk of cesarean delivery (17.4%) that was similar to the actual rate of cesarean delivery in the obstetrician-specialist group (16.7%). The Standardized Cesarean Delivery Ratio was 1.04. CONCLUSION: Lower cesarean delivery rates provided by family physicians may not be simply due to case-mix issues. Additional studies comparing the pre-delivery estimation of cesarean delivery risk would be helpful in measuring the relative levels of obstetric risk of patients treated by different maternity-care provider types. Dove Medical Press 2010-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2990893/ /pubmed/21151731 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S9494 Text en © 2010 Nicholson, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nicholson, James M
Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization
title Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization
title_full Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization
title_fullStr Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization
title_full_unstemmed Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization
title_short Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization
title_sort risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151731
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S9494
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholsonjamesm riskadjustmentinmaternitycaretheuseofindirectstandardization