Cargando…

Distracting the Mind Improves Performance: An ERP Study

BACKGROUND: When a second target (T2) is presented in close succession of a first target (T1), people often fail to identify T2, a phenomenon known as the attentional blink (AB). However, the AB can be reduced substantially when participants are distracted during the task, for instance by a concurre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wierda, Stefan M., van Rijn, Hedderik, Taatgen, Niels A., Martens, Sander
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2991328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21124833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015024
_version_ 1782192590955741184
author Wierda, Stefan M.
van Rijn, Hedderik
Taatgen, Niels A.
Martens, Sander
author_facet Wierda, Stefan M.
van Rijn, Hedderik
Taatgen, Niels A.
Martens, Sander
author_sort Wierda, Stefan M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When a second target (T2) is presented in close succession of a first target (T1), people often fail to identify T2, a phenomenon known as the attentional blink (AB). However, the AB can be reduced substantially when participants are distracted during the task, for instance by a concurrent task, without a cost for T1 performance. The goal of the current study was to investigate the electrophysiological correlates of this paradoxical effect. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Participants successively performed three tasks, while EEG was recorded. The first task (standard AB) consisted of identifying two target letters in a sequential stream of distractor digits. The second task (grey dots task) was similar to the first task with the addition of an irrelevant grey dot moving in the periphery, concurrent with the central stimulus stream. The third task (red dot task) was similar to the second task, except that detection of an occasional brief color change in the moving grey dot was required. AB magnitude in the latter task was significantly smaller, whereas behavioral performance in the standard and grey dots tasks did not differ. Using mixed effects models, electrophysiological activity was compared during trials in the grey dots and red dot tasks that differed in task instruction but not in perceptual input. In the red dot task, both target-related parietal brain activity associated with working memory updating (P3) as well as distractor-related occipital activity was significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results support the idea that the AB might (at least partly) arise from an overinvestment of attentional resources or an overexertion of attentional control, which is reduced when a distracting secondary task is carried out. The present findings bring us a step closer in understanding why and how an AB occurs, and how these temporal restrictions in selective attention can be overcome.
format Text
id pubmed-2991328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29913282010-12-01 Distracting the Mind Improves Performance: An ERP Study Wierda, Stefan M. van Rijn, Hedderik Taatgen, Niels A. Martens, Sander PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: When a second target (T2) is presented in close succession of a first target (T1), people often fail to identify T2, a phenomenon known as the attentional blink (AB). However, the AB can be reduced substantially when participants are distracted during the task, for instance by a concurrent task, without a cost for T1 performance. The goal of the current study was to investigate the electrophysiological correlates of this paradoxical effect. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Participants successively performed three tasks, while EEG was recorded. The first task (standard AB) consisted of identifying two target letters in a sequential stream of distractor digits. The second task (grey dots task) was similar to the first task with the addition of an irrelevant grey dot moving in the periphery, concurrent with the central stimulus stream. The third task (red dot task) was similar to the second task, except that detection of an occasional brief color change in the moving grey dot was required. AB magnitude in the latter task was significantly smaller, whereas behavioral performance in the standard and grey dots tasks did not differ. Using mixed effects models, electrophysiological activity was compared during trials in the grey dots and red dot tasks that differed in task instruction but not in perceptual input. In the red dot task, both target-related parietal brain activity associated with working memory updating (P3) as well as distractor-related occipital activity was significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results support the idea that the AB might (at least partly) arise from an overinvestment of attentional resources or an overexertion of attentional control, which is reduced when a distracting secondary task is carried out. The present findings bring us a step closer in understanding why and how an AB occurs, and how these temporal restrictions in selective attention can be overcome. Public Library of Science 2010-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2991328/ /pubmed/21124833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015024 Text en Wierda et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wierda, Stefan M.
van Rijn, Hedderik
Taatgen, Niels A.
Martens, Sander
Distracting the Mind Improves Performance: An ERP Study
title Distracting the Mind Improves Performance: An ERP Study
title_full Distracting the Mind Improves Performance: An ERP Study
title_fullStr Distracting the Mind Improves Performance: An ERP Study
title_full_unstemmed Distracting the Mind Improves Performance: An ERP Study
title_short Distracting the Mind Improves Performance: An ERP Study
title_sort distracting the mind improves performance: an erp study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2991328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21124833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015024
work_keys_str_mv AT wierdastefanm distractingthemindimprovesperformanceanerpstudy
AT vanrijnhedderik distractingthemindimprovesperformanceanerpstudy
AT taatgennielsa distractingthemindimprovesperformanceanerpstudy
AT martenssander distractingthemindimprovesperformanceanerpstudy