Cargando…

Comparison of Efficacy and Satisfaction between the TVT-SECUR® and MONARC® Procedures for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

PURPOSE: The tension-free vaginal tape SECUR® (TVT-S) is a new, minimally invasive sling procedure for treating female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, results of comparisons of the TVT-S with the transobturator tape (TOT) sling are lacking. Therefore, we investigated outcome and satisfac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeong, Moo Youl, Kim, Su Jin, Kim, Hyo Sin, Koh, Jun Sung, Kim, Joon Chul
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2991574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21165197
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.767
_version_ 1782192609772437504
author Jeong, Moo Youl
Kim, Su Jin
Kim, Hyo Sin
Koh, Jun Sung
Kim, Joon Chul
author_facet Jeong, Moo Youl
Kim, Su Jin
Kim, Hyo Sin
Koh, Jun Sung
Kim, Joon Chul
author_sort Jeong, Moo Youl
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The tension-free vaginal tape SECUR® (TVT-S) is a new, minimally invasive sling procedure for treating female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, results of comparisons of the TVT-S with the transobturator tape (TOT) sling are lacking. Therefore, we investigated outcome and satisfaction of the TVT-S procedure compared with the TOT procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 64 patients with SUI who underwent the TVT-S (n=31) or TOT (MONARC®, n=33) procedure and were followed up for more than 1 year. The preoperative evaluation included history taking, pelvic examination, consecutive 3-day voiding diary, and urodynamic study including Valsalva leak point pressure. Postoperatively, continence status and subjective patient satisfaction were evaluated. Cure was defined as the absence of any episodes of involuntary urine leakage during stressful activities and a stress cough test. RESULTS: The TVT-S group (71.0%) showed a slightly lower cure rate than did the MONARC group (84.8%); however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (p=0.179). Nine of the patients who underwent the TVT-S showed incontinence postoperatively. Among them, the H approach was used in 7 patients and the U approach was done in 2 patients. Following TVT-S and MONARC, the patients' reported satisfaction was 80.6% and 78.8%, respectively. Patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between the two groups (p=0.854). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the TVT-S and MONARC procedures may be comparable in terms of cure rate and patient satisfaction after more than 1 year of follow-up.
format Text
id pubmed-2991574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29915742010-12-16 Comparison of Efficacy and Satisfaction between the TVT-SECUR® and MONARC® Procedures for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Jeong, Moo Youl Kim, Su Jin Kim, Hyo Sin Koh, Jun Sung Kim, Joon Chul Korean J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: The tension-free vaginal tape SECUR® (TVT-S) is a new, minimally invasive sling procedure for treating female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, results of comparisons of the TVT-S with the transobturator tape (TOT) sling are lacking. Therefore, we investigated outcome and satisfaction of the TVT-S procedure compared with the TOT procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 64 patients with SUI who underwent the TVT-S (n=31) or TOT (MONARC®, n=33) procedure and were followed up for more than 1 year. The preoperative evaluation included history taking, pelvic examination, consecutive 3-day voiding diary, and urodynamic study including Valsalva leak point pressure. Postoperatively, continence status and subjective patient satisfaction were evaluated. Cure was defined as the absence of any episodes of involuntary urine leakage during stressful activities and a stress cough test. RESULTS: The TVT-S group (71.0%) showed a slightly lower cure rate than did the MONARC group (84.8%); however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (p=0.179). Nine of the patients who underwent the TVT-S showed incontinence postoperatively. Among them, the H approach was used in 7 patients and the U approach was done in 2 patients. Following TVT-S and MONARC, the patients' reported satisfaction was 80.6% and 78.8%, respectively. Patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between the two groups (p=0.854). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the TVT-S and MONARC procedures may be comparable in terms of cure rate and patient satisfaction after more than 1 year of follow-up. The Korean Urological Association 2010-11 2010-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2991574/ /pubmed/21165197 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.767 Text en Copyright © The Korean Urological Association, 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jeong, Moo Youl
Kim, Su Jin
Kim, Hyo Sin
Koh, Jun Sung
Kim, Joon Chul
Comparison of Efficacy and Satisfaction between the TVT-SECUR® and MONARC® Procedures for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence
title Comparison of Efficacy and Satisfaction between the TVT-SECUR® and MONARC® Procedures for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence
title_full Comparison of Efficacy and Satisfaction between the TVT-SECUR® and MONARC® Procedures for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence
title_fullStr Comparison of Efficacy and Satisfaction between the TVT-SECUR® and MONARC® Procedures for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Efficacy and Satisfaction between the TVT-SECUR® and MONARC® Procedures for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence
title_short Comparison of Efficacy and Satisfaction between the TVT-SECUR® and MONARC® Procedures for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence
title_sort comparison of efficacy and satisfaction between the tvt-secur® and monarc® procedures for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2991574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21165197
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.767
work_keys_str_mv AT jeongmooyoul comparisonofefficacyandsatisfactionbetweenthetvtsecurandmonarcproceduresforthetreatmentoffemalestressurinaryincontinence
AT kimsujin comparisonofefficacyandsatisfactionbetweenthetvtsecurandmonarcproceduresforthetreatmentoffemalestressurinaryincontinence
AT kimhyosin comparisonofefficacyandsatisfactionbetweenthetvtsecurandmonarcproceduresforthetreatmentoffemalestressurinaryincontinence
AT kohjunsung comparisonofefficacyandsatisfactionbetweenthetvtsecurandmonarcproceduresforthetreatmentoffemalestressurinaryincontinence
AT kimjoonchul comparisonofefficacyandsatisfactionbetweenthetvtsecurandmonarcproceduresforthetreatmentoffemalestressurinaryincontinence