Cargando…
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with Treatment Outcomes between Ureteroscopy and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteral Stones
PURPOSE: We examined patient satisfaction with treatment outcomes after shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopic removal of stone (URS) for proximal ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 224 consecutive patients who underwent SWL (n=156) or URS (n=68) for a single radiopaque pro...
Autores principales: | Lee, Jong-Hyun, Woo, Seung Hyo, Kim, Eun Tak, Kim, Dae Kyung, Park, Jinsung |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Urological Association
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2991578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21165201 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.788 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy
por: Khalil, Mostafa
Publicado: (2013) -
Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in patients with proximal ureteral stones under the COVID-19 pandemic
por: Wang, Peng, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones according to ESWL intensity
por: Yoon, Ji Hyung, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Complementary Ureterorenoscopy after extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in proximal ureteral stones: success and complications
por: Demirelli, Erhan, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm
por: Yao, Feng, et al.
Publicado: (2021)