Cargando…

CRIMSON [CRisis plan IMpact: Subjective and Objective coercion and eNgagement] Protocol: A randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment of people with psychosis

BACKGROUND: The use of compulsory treatment under the Mental Health Act (MHA) has continued to rise in the UK and in other countries. The Joint Crisis Plan (JCP) is a statement of service users' wishes for treatment in the event of a future mental health crisis. It is developed with the clinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thornicroft, Graham, Farrelly, Simone, Birchwood, Max, Marshall, Max, Szmukler, George, Waheed, Waquas, Byford, Sarah, Dunn, Graham, Henderson, Claire, Lester, Helen, Leese, Morven, Rose, Diana, Sutherby, Kim
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2992058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21054847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-102
_version_ 1782192700251963392
author Thornicroft, Graham
Farrelly, Simone
Birchwood, Max
Marshall, Max
Szmukler, George
Waheed, Waquas
Byford, Sarah
Dunn, Graham
Henderson, Claire
Lester, Helen
Leese, Morven
Rose, Diana
Sutherby, Kim
author_facet Thornicroft, Graham
Farrelly, Simone
Birchwood, Max
Marshall, Max
Szmukler, George
Waheed, Waquas
Byford, Sarah
Dunn, Graham
Henderson, Claire
Lester, Helen
Leese, Morven
Rose, Diana
Sutherby, Kim
author_sort Thornicroft, Graham
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of compulsory treatment under the Mental Health Act (MHA) has continued to rise in the UK and in other countries. The Joint Crisis Plan (JCP) is a statement of service users' wishes for treatment in the event of a future mental health crisis. It is developed with the clinical team and an independent facilitator. A recent pilot RCT showed a reduction in the use of the MHA amongst service users with a JCP. The JCP is the only intervention that has been shown to reduce compulsory treatment in this way. The CRIMSON trial aims to determine if JCPs, compared with treatment as usual, are effective in reducing the use of the MHA in a range of treatment settings across the UK. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a 3 centre, individual-level, single-blind, randomised controlled trial of the JCP compared with treatment as usual for people with a history of relapsing psychotic illness in Birmingham, London and Lancashire/Manchester. 540 service users will be recruited across the three sites. Eligible service users will be adults with a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder (including bipolar disorder), treated in the community under the Care Programme Approach with at least one admission to a psychiatric inpatient ward in the previous two years. Current inpatients and those subject to a community treatment order will be excluded to avoid any potential perceived pressure to participate. Research assessments will be conducted at baseline and 18 months. Following the baseline assessment, eligible service users will be randomly allocated to either develop a Joint Crisis Plan or continue with treatment as usual. Outcome will be assessed at 18 months with assessors blind to treatment allocation. The primary outcome is the proportion of service users treated or otherwise detained under an order of the Mental Health Act (MHA) during the follow-up period, compared across randomisation groups. Secondary outcomes include overall costs, service user engagement, perceived coercion and therapeutic relationships. Sub-analyses will explore the effectiveness of the JCP in reducing use of the MHA specifically for Black Caribbean and Black African service users (combined). Qualitative investigations with staff and service users will explore the acceptability of the JCPs. DISCUSSION: JCPs offer a potential solution to the rise of compulsory treatment for individuals with psychotic disorders and, if shown to be effective in this trial, they are likely to be of interest to mental health service providers worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN11501328
format Text
id pubmed-2992058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29920582010-11-26 CRIMSON [CRisis plan IMpact: Subjective and Objective coercion and eNgagement] Protocol: A randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment of people with psychosis Thornicroft, Graham Farrelly, Simone Birchwood, Max Marshall, Max Szmukler, George Waheed, Waquas Byford, Sarah Dunn, Graham Henderson, Claire Lester, Helen Leese, Morven Rose, Diana Sutherby, Kim Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The use of compulsory treatment under the Mental Health Act (MHA) has continued to rise in the UK and in other countries. The Joint Crisis Plan (JCP) is a statement of service users' wishes for treatment in the event of a future mental health crisis. It is developed with the clinical team and an independent facilitator. A recent pilot RCT showed a reduction in the use of the MHA amongst service users with a JCP. The JCP is the only intervention that has been shown to reduce compulsory treatment in this way. The CRIMSON trial aims to determine if JCPs, compared with treatment as usual, are effective in reducing the use of the MHA in a range of treatment settings across the UK. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a 3 centre, individual-level, single-blind, randomised controlled trial of the JCP compared with treatment as usual for people with a history of relapsing psychotic illness in Birmingham, London and Lancashire/Manchester. 540 service users will be recruited across the three sites. Eligible service users will be adults with a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder (including bipolar disorder), treated in the community under the Care Programme Approach with at least one admission to a psychiatric inpatient ward in the previous two years. Current inpatients and those subject to a community treatment order will be excluded to avoid any potential perceived pressure to participate. Research assessments will be conducted at baseline and 18 months. Following the baseline assessment, eligible service users will be randomly allocated to either develop a Joint Crisis Plan or continue with treatment as usual. Outcome will be assessed at 18 months with assessors blind to treatment allocation. The primary outcome is the proportion of service users treated or otherwise detained under an order of the Mental Health Act (MHA) during the follow-up period, compared across randomisation groups. Secondary outcomes include overall costs, service user engagement, perceived coercion and therapeutic relationships. Sub-analyses will explore the effectiveness of the JCP in reducing use of the MHA specifically for Black Caribbean and Black African service users (combined). Qualitative investigations with staff and service users will explore the acceptability of the JCPs. DISCUSSION: JCPs offer a potential solution to the rise of compulsory treatment for individuals with psychotic disorders and, if shown to be effective in this trial, they are likely to be of interest to mental health service providers worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN11501328 BioMed Central 2010-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2992058/ /pubmed/21054847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-102 Text en Copyright ©2010 Thornicroft et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Thornicroft, Graham
Farrelly, Simone
Birchwood, Max
Marshall, Max
Szmukler, George
Waheed, Waquas
Byford, Sarah
Dunn, Graham
Henderson, Claire
Lester, Helen
Leese, Morven
Rose, Diana
Sutherby, Kim
CRIMSON [CRisis plan IMpact: Subjective and Objective coercion and eNgagement] Protocol: A randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment of people with psychosis
title CRIMSON [CRisis plan IMpact: Subjective and Objective coercion and eNgagement] Protocol: A randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment of people with psychosis
title_full CRIMSON [CRisis plan IMpact: Subjective and Objective coercion and eNgagement] Protocol: A randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment of people with psychosis
title_fullStr CRIMSON [CRisis plan IMpact: Subjective and Objective coercion and eNgagement] Protocol: A randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment of people with psychosis
title_full_unstemmed CRIMSON [CRisis plan IMpact: Subjective and Objective coercion and eNgagement] Protocol: A randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment of people with psychosis
title_short CRIMSON [CRisis plan IMpact: Subjective and Objective coercion and eNgagement] Protocol: A randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment of people with psychosis
title_sort crimson [crisis plan impact: subjective and objective coercion and engagement] protocol: a randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment of people with psychosis
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2992058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21054847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-102
work_keys_str_mv AT thornicroftgraham crimsoncrisisplanimpactsubjectiveandobjectivecoercionandengagementprotocolarandomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentofpeoplewithpsychosis
AT farrellysimone crimsoncrisisplanimpactsubjectiveandobjectivecoercionandengagementprotocolarandomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentofpeoplewithpsychosis
AT birchwoodmax crimsoncrisisplanimpactsubjectiveandobjectivecoercionandengagementprotocolarandomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentofpeoplewithpsychosis
AT marshallmax crimsoncrisisplanimpactsubjectiveandobjectivecoercionandengagementprotocolarandomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentofpeoplewithpsychosis
AT szmuklergeorge crimsoncrisisplanimpactsubjectiveandobjectivecoercionandengagementprotocolarandomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentofpeoplewithpsychosis
AT waheedwaquas crimsoncrisisplanimpactsubjectiveandobjectivecoercionandengagementprotocolarandomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentofpeoplewithpsychosis
AT byfordsarah crimsoncrisisplanimpactsubjectiveandobjectivecoercionandengagementprotocolarandomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentofpeoplewithpsychosis
AT dunngraham crimsoncrisisplanimpactsubjectiveandobjectivecoercionandengagementprotocolarandomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentofpeoplewithpsychosis
AT hendersonclaire crimsoncrisisplanimpactsubjectiveandobjectivecoercionandengagementprotocolarandomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentofpeoplewithpsychosis
AT lesterhelen crimsoncrisisplanimpactsubjectiveandobjectivecoercionandengagementprotocolarandomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentofpeoplewithpsychosis
AT leesemorven crimsoncrisisplanimpactsubjectiveandobjectivecoercionandengagementprotocolarandomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentofpeoplewithpsychosis
AT rosediana crimsoncrisisplanimpactsubjectiveandobjectivecoercionandengagementprotocolarandomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentofpeoplewithpsychosis
AT sutherbykim crimsoncrisisplanimpactsubjectiveandobjectivecoercionandengagementprotocolarandomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentofpeoplewithpsychosis