Cargando…

Assessment of a modification of Brückner’s test as a screening modality for anisometropia and strabismus

BACKGROUND: Current amblyopia screening methods are not cost effective. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic capability of a modified Brückner test (MBT) for amblyopiogenic risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We applied the MBT using the streak retinoscope to identify anisometropia and strabismus by not...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amitava, Abadan Khan, Kewlani, D., Khan, Z., Razzak, A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2992160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21120049
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.71890
_version_ 1782192717587021824
author Amitava, Abadan Khan
Kewlani, D.
Khan, Z.
Razzak, A.
author_facet Amitava, Abadan Khan
Kewlani, D.
Khan, Z.
Razzak, A.
author_sort Amitava, Abadan Khan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current amblyopia screening methods are not cost effective. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic capability of a modified Brückner test (MBT) for amblyopiogenic risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We applied the MBT using the streak retinoscope to identify anisometropia and strabismus by noting an inter-ocular difference in movement and glow, from children who failed 6/9 Snellen on community vision screening, followed by comprehensive eye examination. STATISITICS: Data were analyzed by 2 × 2 tables for diagnostic test parameters (95% CI). RESULTS: From 7998 children vision-screened, 392 failed 6/9 VA and were referred. Since 34 failed to reach the centers, and 15 were excluded due to poor/ no glow, data from 343 was analyzed. The prevalence of anisometropia of 0.5D was 17%, of 1D was 11% and of strabismus 5%. For the MBT the accuracy was ≥ 90% (95%CI 89% to 97%) over the three outcomes. The sensitivity, specificity, NPV and +LR for anisometropia of 0.5D were: 0.57 (0.48, 0.64), 0.97 (0.95, 0.98), 0.92 (0.90, 0.93) and 18 (9.7, 35); for 1D: 0.74(0.60, 0.82), 0.95 (0.94, 0.97), 0.97 (0.95, 0.98) and 16 (9.3, 28); and for strabismus: 0.5 (0.32, 0.66), 0.98 (0.97, 0.98), 0.97 (0.96, 0.98) and 20 (9.1, 42). CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that the MBT is highly accurate and useful for ruling in anisometropia and strabismus in children who fail 6/9 Snellen. The MBT needs further validation, both by different care givers and on differing populations. It offers an affordable, portable, and clinically useful tool to detect anisometropia and strabismus. We suggest that performing an MBT prior to uniocular retinosocpy should be a routine practice.
format Text
id pubmed-2992160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29921602010-11-30 Assessment of a modification of Brückner’s test as a screening modality for anisometropia and strabismus Amitava, Abadan Khan Kewlani, D. Khan, Z. Razzak, A. Oman J Ophthalmol Original Article BACKGROUND: Current amblyopia screening methods are not cost effective. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic capability of a modified Brückner test (MBT) for amblyopiogenic risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We applied the MBT using the streak retinoscope to identify anisometropia and strabismus by noting an inter-ocular difference in movement and glow, from children who failed 6/9 Snellen on community vision screening, followed by comprehensive eye examination. STATISITICS: Data were analyzed by 2 × 2 tables for diagnostic test parameters (95% CI). RESULTS: From 7998 children vision-screened, 392 failed 6/9 VA and were referred. Since 34 failed to reach the centers, and 15 were excluded due to poor/ no glow, data from 343 was analyzed. The prevalence of anisometropia of 0.5D was 17%, of 1D was 11% and of strabismus 5%. For the MBT the accuracy was ≥ 90% (95%CI 89% to 97%) over the three outcomes. The sensitivity, specificity, NPV and +LR for anisometropia of 0.5D were: 0.57 (0.48, 0.64), 0.97 (0.95, 0.98), 0.92 (0.90, 0.93) and 18 (9.7, 35); for 1D: 0.74(0.60, 0.82), 0.95 (0.94, 0.97), 0.97 (0.95, 0.98) and 16 (9.3, 28); and for strabismus: 0.5 (0.32, 0.66), 0.98 (0.97, 0.98), 0.97 (0.96, 0.98) and 20 (9.1, 42). CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that the MBT is highly accurate and useful for ruling in anisometropia and strabismus in children who fail 6/9 Snellen. The MBT needs further validation, both by different care givers and on differing populations. It offers an affordable, portable, and clinically useful tool to detect anisometropia and strabismus. We suggest that performing an MBT prior to uniocular retinosocpy should be a routine practice. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2992160/ /pubmed/21120049 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.71890 Text en © Oman Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Amitava, Abadan Khan
Kewlani, D.
Khan, Z.
Razzak, A.
Assessment of a modification of Brückner’s test as a screening modality for anisometropia and strabismus
title Assessment of a modification of Brückner’s test as a screening modality for anisometropia and strabismus
title_full Assessment of a modification of Brückner’s test as a screening modality for anisometropia and strabismus
title_fullStr Assessment of a modification of Brückner’s test as a screening modality for anisometropia and strabismus
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of a modification of Brückner’s test as a screening modality for anisometropia and strabismus
title_short Assessment of a modification of Brückner’s test as a screening modality for anisometropia and strabismus
title_sort assessment of a modification of brückner’s test as a screening modality for anisometropia and strabismus
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2992160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21120049
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.71890
work_keys_str_mv AT amitavaabadankhan assessmentofamodificationofbrucknerstestasascreeningmodalityforanisometropiaandstrabismus
AT kewlanid assessmentofamodificationofbrucknerstestasascreeningmodalityforanisometropiaandstrabismus
AT khanz assessmentofamodificationofbrucknerstestasascreeningmodalityforanisometropiaandstrabismus
AT razzaka assessmentofamodificationofbrucknerstestasascreeningmodalityforanisometropiaandstrabismus