Cargando…

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry

PURPOSE: To compare corneal pachymetry assessment by the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer with that done by ultrasound (US) pachymetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty six patients (92 eyes) were subjected to corneal pachymetry assessment by Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and US. All the readings w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ladi, Jeevan S, Shah, Nitant A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2992912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20689192
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.67045
_version_ 1782192788624900096
author Ladi, Jeevan S
Shah, Nitant A
author_facet Ladi, Jeevan S
Shah, Nitant A
author_sort Ladi, Jeevan S
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare corneal pachymetry assessment by the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer with that done by ultrasound (US) pachymetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty six patients (92 eyes) were subjected to corneal pachymetry assessment by Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and US. All the readings were taken by a single operator. Intraoperator repeatability for the Galilei was assessed by taking 10 readings in one eye each of 10 patients. To study the interoperator reproducibility for the Galilei, two observers took a single reading in both the eyes of 25 patients. RESULTS: The mean central corneal thickness (CCT) measured by US was 541.83 ± 30.56 μm standard deviation (SD) and that measured by Galilei was 541.27 ± 30.07 μm (SD). There was no statistically significant difference between both the methods (P < 0.001). The coefficient of repeatability was 0.43% while the coefficient of reproducibility was 0.377% for the Galilei. CONCLUSION: Objective, noncontact measurement of the CCT with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer was convenient, had excellent intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility, and findings were similar to those obtained with standard US pachymetry.
format Text
id pubmed-2992912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29929122010-12-14 Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry Ladi, Jeevan S Shah, Nitant A Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare corneal pachymetry assessment by the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer with that done by ultrasound (US) pachymetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty six patients (92 eyes) were subjected to corneal pachymetry assessment by Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and US. All the readings were taken by a single operator. Intraoperator repeatability for the Galilei was assessed by taking 10 readings in one eye each of 10 patients. To study the interoperator reproducibility for the Galilei, two observers took a single reading in both the eyes of 25 patients. RESULTS: The mean central corneal thickness (CCT) measured by US was 541.83 ± 30.56 μm standard deviation (SD) and that measured by Galilei was 541.27 ± 30.07 μm (SD). There was no statistically significant difference between both the methods (P < 0.001). The coefficient of repeatability was 0.43% while the coefficient of reproducibility was 0.377% for the Galilei. CONCLUSION: Objective, noncontact measurement of the CCT with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer was convenient, had excellent intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility, and findings were similar to those obtained with standard US pachymetry. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2992912/ /pubmed/20689192 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.67045 Text en © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ladi, Jeevan S
Shah, Nitant A
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry
title Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry
title_full Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry
title_fullStr Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry
title_short Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry
title_sort comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the galilei dual scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2992912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20689192
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.67045
work_keys_str_mv AT ladijeevans comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementswiththegalileidualscheimpfluganalyzerandultrasoundpachymetry
AT shahnitanta comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementswiththegalileidualscheimpfluganalyzerandultrasoundpachymetry