Cargando…
Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species
The stomata of conifers display very little short-term response to changes in atmospheric CO(2) concentration (C(a)), whereas the stomatal responses of angiosperms to C(a) increase in response to water stress. This behaviour of angiosperm stomata appears to be dependent on foliar levels of abscisic...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2993912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20797996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq260 |
_version_ | 1782192857139904512 |
---|---|
author | McAdam, Scott A. M. Brodribb, Timothy J. Ross, John J. Jordan, Gregory J. |
author_facet | McAdam, Scott A. M. Brodribb, Timothy J. Ross, John J. Jordan, Gregory J. |
author_sort | McAdam, Scott A. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The stomata of conifers display very little short-term response to changes in atmospheric CO(2) concentration (C(a)), whereas the stomatal responses of angiosperms to C(a) increase in response to water stress. This behaviour of angiosperm stomata appears to be dependent on foliar levels of abscisic acid (ABA(f)). Here two alternative explanations for the stomatal insensitivity of conifers to C(a) are tested: that conifers have either low ABA(f) or a higher or absent threshold for ABA-induced sensitivity. The responsiveness of stomatal conductance (g(s)) to a sequence of transitions in C(a) (386, 100, and 600 μmol mol(−1)) was recorded over a range of ABA(f) in an angiosperm and two divergent conifer species. The different ABA levels were induced by a mild drought cycle. Although the angiosperm and conifer species showed similar proportional increases in ABA(f) following drought, conifer stomata remained insensitive to changes in C(a) whereas angiosperm stomata showed enhanced sensitivity with increasing ABA(f). The conifers, however, had much higher ABA(f) prior to drought than the angiosperm species, suggesting that non-sensitivity to C(a) in these conifers was due to an absent or inactive response/signalling pathway rather than insufficient ABA(f). |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2993912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29939122010-12-01 Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species McAdam, Scott A. M. Brodribb, Timothy J. Ross, John J. Jordan, Gregory J. J Exp Bot Research Papers The stomata of conifers display very little short-term response to changes in atmospheric CO(2) concentration (C(a)), whereas the stomatal responses of angiosperms to C(a) increase in response to water stress. This behaviour of angiosperm stomata appears to be dependent on foliar levels of abscisic acid (ABA(f)). Here two alternative explanations for the stomatal insensitivity of conifers to C(a) are tested: that conifers have either low ABA(f) or a higher or absent threshold for ABA-induced sensitivity. The responsiveness of stomatal conductance (g(s)) to a sequence of transitions in C(a) (386, 100, and 600 μmol mol(−1)) was recorded over a range of ABA(f) in an angiosperm and two divergent conifer species. The different ABA levels were induced by a mild drought cycle. Although the angiosperm and conifer species showed similar proportional increases in ABA(f) following drought, conifer stomata remained insensitive to changes in C(a) whereas angiosperm stomata showed enhanced sensitivity with increasing ABA(f). The conifers, however, had much higher ABA(f) prior to drought than the angiosperm species, suggesting that non-sensitivity to C(a) in these conifers was due to an absent or inactive response/signalling pathway rather than insufficient ABA(f). Oxford University Press 2011-01 2010-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2993912/ /pubmed/20797996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq260 Text en © 2010 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This paper is available online free of all access charges (see http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/open_access.html for further details) |
spellingShingle | Research Papers McAdam, Scott A. M. Brodribb, Timothy J. Ross, John J. Jordan, Gregory J. Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species |
title | Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species |
title_full | Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species |
title_fullStr | Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species |
title_full_unstemmed | Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species |
title_short | Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species |
title_sort | augmentation of abscisic acid (aba) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to co(2) in two divergent conifer species |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2993912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20797996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq260 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcadamscottam augmentationofabscisicacidabalevelsbydroughtdoesnotinduceshorttermstomatalsensitivitytoco2intwodivergentconiferspecies AT brodribbtimothyj augmentationofabscisicacidabalevelsbydroughtdoesnotinduceshorttermstomatalsensitivitytoco2intwodivergentconiferspecies AT rossjohnj augmentationofabscisicacidabalevelsbydroughtdoesnotinduceshorttermstomatalsensitivitytoco2intwodivergentconiferspecies AT jordangregoryj augmentationofabscisicacidabalevelsbydroughtdoesnotinduceshorttermstomatalsensitivitytoco2intwodivergentconiferspecies |