Cargando…

Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species

The stomata of conifers display very little short-term response to changes in atmospheric CO(2) concentration (C(a)), whereas the stomatal responses of angiosperms to C(a) increase in response to water stress. This behaviour of angiosperm stomata appears to be dependent on foliar levels of abscisic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McAdam, Scott A. M., Brodribb, Timothy J., Ross, John J., Jordan, Gregory J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2993912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20797996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq260
_version_ 1782192857139904512
author McAdam, Scott A. M.
Brodribb, Timothy J.
Ross, John J.
Jordan, Gregory J.
author_facet McAdam, Scott A. M.
Brodribb, Timothy J.
Ross, John J.
Jordan, Gregory J.
author_sort McAdam, Scott A. M.
collection PubMed
description The stomata of conifers display very little short-term response to changes in atmospheric CO(2) concentration (C(a)), whereas the stomatal responses of angiosperms to C(a) increase in response to water stress. This behaviour of angiosperm stomata appears to be dependent on foliar levels of abscisic acid (ABA(f)). Here two alternative explanations for the stomatal insensitivity of conifers to C(a) are tested: that conifers have either low ABA(f) or a higher or absent threshold for ABA-induced sensitivity. The responsiveness of stomatal conductance (g(s)) to a sequence of transitions in C(a) (386, 100, and 600 μmol mol(−1)) was recorded over a range of ABA(f) in an angiosperm and two divergent conifer species. The different ABA levels were induced by a mild drought cycle. Although the angiosperm and conifer species showed similar proportional increases in ABA(f) following drought, conifer stomata remained insensitive to changes in C(a) whereas angiosperm stomata showed enhanced sensitivity with increasing ABA(f). The conifers, however, had much higher ABA(f) prior to drought than the angiosperm species, suggesting that non-sensitivity to C(a) in these conifers was due to an absent or inactive response/signalling pathway rather than insufficient ABA(f).
format Text
id pubmed-2993912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29939122010-12-01 Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species McAdam, Scott A. M. Brodribb, Timothy J. Ross, John J. Jordan, Gregory J. J Exp Bot Research Papers The stomata of conifers display very little short-term response to changes in atmospheric CO(2) concentration (C(a)), whereas the stomatal responses of angiosperms to C(a) increase in response to water stress. This behaviour of angiosperm stomata appears to be dependent on foliar levels of abscisic acid (ABA(f)). Here two alternative explanations for the stomatal insensitivity of conifers to C(a) are tested: that conifers have either low ABA(f) or a higher or absent threshold for ABA-induced sensitivity. The responsiveness of stomatal conductance (g(s)) to a sequence of transitions in C(a) (386, 100, and 600 μmol mol(−1)) was recorded over a range of ABA(f) in an angiosperm and two divergent conifer species. The different ABA levels were induced by a mild drought cycle. Although the angiosperm and conifer species showed similar proportional increases in ABA(f) following drought, conifer stomata remained insensitive to changes in C(a) whereas angiosperm stomata showed enhanced sensitivity with increasing ABA(f). The conifers, however, had much higher ABA(f) prior to drought than the angiosperm species, suggesting that non-sensitivity to C(a) in these conifers was due to an absent or inactive response/signalling pathway rather than insufficient ABA(f). Oxford University Press 2011-01 2010-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2993912/ /pubmed/20797996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq260 Text en © 2010 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This paper is available online free of all access charges (see http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/open_access.html for further details)
spellingShingle Research Papers
McAdam, Scott A. M.
Brodribb, Timothy J.
Ross, John J.
Jordan, Gregory J.
Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species
title Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species
title_full Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species
title_fullStr Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species
title_full_unstemmed Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species
title_short Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO(2) in two divergent conifer species
title_sort augmentation of abscisic acid (aba) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to co(2) in two divergent conifer species
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2993912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20797996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq260
work_keys_str_mv AT mcadamscottam augmentationofabscisicacidabalevelsbydroughtdoesnotinduceshorttermstomatalsensitivitytoco2intwodivergentconiferspecies
AT brodribbtimothyj augmentationofabscisicacidabalevelsbydroughtdoesnotinduceshorttermstomatalsensitivitytoco2intwodivergentconiferspecies
AT rossjohnj augmentationofabscisicacidabalevelsbydroughtdoesnotinduceshorttermstomatalsensitivitytoco2intwodivergentconiferspecies
AT jordangregoryj augmentationofabscisicacidabalevelsbydroughtdoesnotinduceshorttermstomatalsensitivitytoco2intwodivergentconiferspecies