Cargando…

Do patients wish to ‘listen in’ when doctors dictate letters to colleagues?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects on clinical outcome of dictating correspondence in front of patients and sending them copies of letters. DESIGN: Observational study of the practices of two consultants, one of whom (RDS) routinely dictated letters in front of his patients and almost always sent t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Silva, Rajith, Misbahuddin, Anjum, Mikhail, Salwa, Grayson, Kate
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal Society of Medicine Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2994352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21234110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/shorts.2010.010049
_version_ 1782192919943315456
author de Silva, Rajith
Misbahuddin, Anjum
Mikhail, Salwa
Grayson, Kate
author_facet de Silva, Rajith
Misbahuddin, Anjum
Mikhail, Salwa
Grayson, Kate
author_sort de Silva, Rajith
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects on clinical outcome of dictating correspondence in front of patients and sending them copies of letters. DESIGN: Observational study of the practices of two consultants, one of whom (RDS) routinely dictated letters in front of his patients and almost always sent them a copy while the other (AM) did neither. Questionnaires were completed anonymously by patients at the end of their consultation. SETTING: Neurology department of a teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients attending neurology outpatient clinics. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent and 62% of the two consultants' patients were audited, and the demographic features of the two groups were similar. Eighty-six percent and 25% of RDS's and AM's patients, respectively, said that they wished to be present during dictation (p < 0.001). Within AM's group, those who had had some experience of the practice (with other consultants) were more likely to express a desire to be present during dictation (p = 0.023). Ninety-two percent and 77% of RDS's and AM's patients, respectively, felt that having a copy of their letter would be ‘very useful’ or ‘useful’ (p < 0.001). The perceived usefulness of receiving a copy letter and the desire to be present during dictation were associated for the total group and for RDS's patients. The two groups of patients were asked to express their degree of understanding at the end of the consultation, and 81% and 93% of RDS's and AM's patients, respectively, thought that their understanding was ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. No trends emerged with regard to patients' preferences (to be present or absent during dictation and to receive or not receive a copy of their letter) and their level of understanding. CONCLUSIONS: Patients appear to like being present when their letters are dictated, and appreciate receiving copies of these, but their overall understanding is seemingly independent of these variables. The success of the clinical consultation is probably influenced by numerous factors, and the elevation of patients' presence during dictation of correspondence and receipt of copy letters above all others seems unjustified.
format Text
id pubmed-2994352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Royal Society of Medicine Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29943522011-01-13 Do patients wish to ‘listen in’ when doctors dictate letters to colleagues? de Silva, Rajith Misbahuddin, Anjum Mikhail, Salwa Grayson, Kate JRSM Short Rep Research OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects on clinical outcome of dictating correspondence in front of patients and sending them copies of letters. DESIGN: Observational study of the practices of two consultants, one of whom (RDS) routinely dictated letters in front of his patients and almost always sent them a copy while the other (AM) did neither. Questionnaires were completed anonymously by patients at the end of their consultation. SETTING: Neurology department of a teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients attending neurology outpatient clinics. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent and 62% of the two consultants' patients were audited, and the demographic features of the two groups were similar. Eighty-six percent and 25% of RDS's and AM's patients, respectively, said that they wished to be present during dictation (p < 0.001). Within AM's group, those who had had some experience of the practice (with other consultants) were more likely to express a desire to be present during dictation (p = 0.023). Ninety-two percent and 77% of RDS's and AM's patients, respectively, felt that having a copy of their letter would be ‘very useful’ or ‘useful’ (p < 0.001). The perceived usefulness of receiving a copy letter and the desire to be present during dictation were associated for the total group and for RDS's patients. The two groups of patients were asked to express their degree of understanding at the end of the consultation, and 81% and 93% of RDS's and AM's patients, respectively, thought that their understanding was ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. No trends emerged with regard to patients' preferences (to be present or absent during dictation and to receive or not receive a copy of their letter) and their level of understanding. CONCLUSIONS: Patients appear to like being present when their letters are dictated, and appreciate receiving copies of these, but their overall understanding is seemingly independent of these variables. The success of the clinical consultation is probably influenced by numerous factors, and the elevation of patients' presence during dictation of correspondence and receipt of copy letters above all others seems unjustified. Royal Society of Medicine Press 2010-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2994352/ /pubmed/21234110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/shorts.2010.010049 Text en © 2010 Royal Society of Medicine Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/), which permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
de Silva, Rajith
Misbahuddin, Anjum
Mikhail, Salwa
Grayson, Kate
Do patients wish to ‘listen in’ when doctors dictate letters to colleagues?
title Do patients wish to ‘listen in’ when doctors dictate letters to colleagues?
title_full Do patients wish to ‘listen in’ when doctors dictate letters to colleagues?
title_fullStr Do patients wish to ‘listen in’ when doctors dictate letters to colleagues?
title_full_unstemmed Do patients wish to ‘listen in’ when doctors dictate letters to colleagues?
title_short Do patients wish to ‘listen in’ when doctors dictate letters to colleagues?
title_sort do patients wish to ‘listen in’ when doctors dictate letters to colleagues?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2994352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21234110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/shorts.2010.010049
work_keys_str_mv AT desilvarajith dopatientswishtolisteninwhendoctorsdictateletterstocolleagues
AT misbahuddinanjum dopatientswishtolisteninwhendoctorsdictateletterstocolleagues
AT mikhailsalwa dopatientswishtolisteninwhendoctorsdictateletterstocolleagues
AT graysonkate dopatientswishtolisteninwhendoctorsdictateletterstocolleagues