Cargando…
A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study
PURPOSE: To determine the change in stability of single-stage, three different design of implant systems in humans utilizing resonance frequency analysis for early healing period (24 weeks), without loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients were included into this study. A total of 45 impl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2994671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21165252 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2009.1.1.31 |
_version_ | 1782192971893964800 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jae-Min Kim, Sun-Jong Han, Inho Shin, Sang-Wan Ryu, Jae-Jun |
author_facet | Kim, Jae-Min Kim, Sun-Jong Han, Inho Shin, Sang-Wan Ryu, Jae-Jun |
author_sort | Kim, Jae-Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine the change in stability of single-stage, three different design of implant systems in humans utilizing resonance frequency analysis for early healing period (24 weeks), without loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients were included into this study. A total of 45 implants, three different design of implant systems (group A,C,R) were placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible. The specific transducer for each implant system was used. ISQ (implant stability quotient) reading were obtained for each implant at the time of surgery, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 weeks postoperatively. Data were analyzed for different implant type, bone type, healing time, anatomical locations. RESULTS: For each implant system, a two-factor mixed-model ANOVA demonstrated that a significant effect on ISQ values (group A = 0.0022, C = 0.017, R = 0.0018). For each implant system, in a two-factor mixed model ANOVA, and two-sample t-test, the main effect of jaw position (P > .005) on ISQ values were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: All the implant groups A, C and R, the change patterns of ISQ over time differed by bone type. Implant stability increased greatly between week 0 and week six and showed slow increase between week six and six months (plateau effect). |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2994671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29946712010-12-16 A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study Kim, Jae-Min Kim, Sun-Jong Han, Inho Shin, Sang-Wan Ryu, Jae-Jun J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: To determine the change in stability of single-stage, three different design of implant systems in humans utilizing resonance frequency analysis for early healing period (24 weeks), without loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients were included into this study. A total of 45 implants, three different design of implant systems (group A,C,R) were placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible. The specific transducer for each implant system was used. ISQ (implant stability quotient) reading were obtained for each implant at the time of surgery, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 weeks postoperatively. Data were analyzed for different implant type, bone type, healing time, anatomical locations. RESULTS: For each implant system, a two-factor mixed-model ANOVA demonstrated that a significant effect on ISQ values (group A = 0.0022, C = 0.017, R = 0.0018). For each implant system, in a two-factor mixed model ANOVA, and two-sample t-test, the main effect of jaw position (P > .005) on ISQ values were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: All the implant groups A, C and R, the change patterns of ISQ over time differed by bone type. Implant stability increased greatly between week 0 and week six and showed slow increase between week six and six months (plateau effect). The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2009-03 2009-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2994671/ /pubmed/21165252 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2009.1.1.31 Text en Copyright © 2009 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Jae-Min Kim, Sun-Jong Han, Inho Shin, Sang-Wan Ryu, Jae-Jun A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study |
title | A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study |
title_full | A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study |
title_fullStr | A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study |
title_short | A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study |
title_sort | comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2994671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21165252 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2009.1.1.31 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjaemin acomparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy AT kimsunjong acomparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy AT haninho acomparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy AT shinsangwan acomparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy AT ryujaejun acomparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy AT kimjaemin comparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy AT kimsunjong comparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy AT haninho comparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy AT shinsangwan comparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy AT ryujaejun comparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy |