Cargando…

A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study

PURPOSE: To determine the change in stability of single-stage, three different design of implant systems in humans utilizing resonance frequency analysis for early healing period (24 weeks), without loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients were included into this study. A total of 45 impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jae-Min, Kim, Sun-Jong, Han, Inho, Shin, Sang-Wan, Ryu, Jae-Jun
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2994671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21165252
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2009.1.1.31
_version_ 1782192971893964800
author Kim, Jae-Min
Kim, Sun-Jong
Han, Inho
Shin, Sang-Wan
Ryu, Jae-Jun
author_facet Kim, Jae-Min
Kim, Sun-Jong
Han, Inho
Shin, Sang-Wan
Ryu, Jae-Jun
author_sort Kim, Jae-Min
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the change in stability of single-stage, three different design of implant systems in humans utilizing resonance frequency analysis for early healing period (24 weeks), without loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients were included into this study. A total of 45 implants, three different design of implant systems (group A,C,R) were placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible. The specific transducer for each implant system was used. ISQ (implant stability quotient) reading were obtained for each implant at the time of surgery, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 weeks postoperatively. Data were analyzed for different implant type, bone type, healing time, anatomical locations. RESULTS: For each implant system, a two-factor mixed-model ANOVA demonstrated that a significant effect on ISQ values (group A = 0.0022, C = 0.017, R = 0.0018). For each implant system, in a two-factor mixed model ANOVA, and two-sample t-test, the main effect of jaw position (P > .005) on ISQ values were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: All the implant groups A, C and R, the change patterns of ISQ over time differed by bone type. Implant stability increased greatly between week 0 and week six and showed slow increase between week six and six months (plateau effect).
format Text
id pubmed-2994671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29946712010-12-16 A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study Kim, Jae-Min Kim, Sun-Jong Han, Inho Shin, Sang-Wan Ryu, Jae-Jun J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: To determine the change in stability of single-stage, three different design of implant systems in humans utilizing resonance frequency analysis for early healing period (24 weeks), without loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients were included into this study. A total of 45 implants, three different design of implant systems (group A,C,R) were placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible. The specific transducer for each implant system was used. ISQ (implant stability quotient) reading were obtained for each implant at the time of surgery, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 weeks postoperatively. Data were analyzed for different implant type, bone type, healing time, anatomical locations. RESULTS: For each implant system, a two-factor mixed-model ANOVA demonstrated that a significant effect on ISQ values (group A = 0.0022, C = 0.017, R = 0.0018). For each implant system, in a two-factor mixed model ANOVA, and two-sample t-test, the main effect of jaw position (P > .005) on ISQ values were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: All the implant groups A, C and R, the change patterns of ISQ over time differed by bone type. Implant stability increased greatly between week 0 and week six and showed slow increase between week six and six months (plateau effect). The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2009-03 2009-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2994671/ /pubmed/21165252 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2009.1.1.31 Text en Copyright © 2009 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Jae-Min
Kim, Sun-Jong
Han, Inho
Shin, Sang-Wan
Ryu, Jae-Jun
A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study
title A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study
title_full A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study
title_fullStr A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study
title_short A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study
title_sort comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2994671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21165252
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2009.1.1.31
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjaemin acomparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy
AT kimsunjong acomparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy
AT haninho acomparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy
AT shinsangwan acomparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy
AT ryujaejun acomparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy
AT kimjaemin comparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy
AT kimsunjong comparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy
AT haninho comparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy
AT shinsangwan comparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy
AT ryujaejun comparisonoftheimplantstabilityamongvariousimplantsystemsclinicalstudy