Cargando…

The level of buccal gingival margin around single and two adjacent implant restorations: a preliminary result

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Little information is available about the buccal gingival level of multiple implant restorations. PURPOSE: This study was aimed to evaluate the relationship between width and height of buccal soft tissue around single and 2 adjacent implant restorations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Young-Bum, Shim, June-Sung, Han, Chong-Hyun, Kim, Sun-Jai
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2994692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21165270
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2009.1.3.140
_version_ 1782192977016258560
author Kim, Young-Bum
Shim, June-Sung
Han, Chong-Hyun
Kim, Sun-Jai
author_facet Kim, Young-Bum
Shim, June-Sung
Han, Chong-Hyun
Kim, Sun-Jai
author_sort Kim, Young-Bum
collection PubMed
description STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Little information is available about the buccal gingival level of multiple implant restorations. PURPOSE: This study was aimed to evaluate the relationship between width and height of buccal soft tissue around single and 2 adjacent implant restorations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four implant restoration groups (first and second molars, single second molars, posterior single restorations between teeth, and anterior single restorations between teeth) were randomly chosen from one dental institute. Each group comprised of 6 patients. After 6 months of function, silicone impressions were taken and stone models were fabricated for each restoration group. The stone models were cut in bucco-lingual direction at the most apical point of buccal gingival margin. The height and width of buccal supra-implant soft tissue were measured. One way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc tests were performed to analyze the data obtained (P < .05). RESULTS: The most unfavorable width-height ratio was noted for the group, which was comprised of the second molar in the multiple adjacent (first and second molar) implant-supported restorations. The group also resulted in the shorter height of buccal supra-implant mucosa rather than that of anterior single implant restorations between natural teeth. CONCLUSION: To achieve a favorable level of buccal gingival margin, greater thickness of buccal supra-implant mucosa is required for the implant restorations without a neighboring natural tooth compared to the implant restorations next to a natural tooth.
format Text
id pubmed-2994692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29946922010-12-16 The level of buccal gingival margin around single and two adjacent implant restorations: a preliminary result Kim, Young-Bum Shim, June-Sung Han, Chong-Hyun Kim, Sun-Jai J Adv Prosthodont Original Article STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Little information is available about the buccal gingival level of multiple implant restorations. PURPOSE: This study was aimed to evaluate the relationship between width and height of buccal soft tissue around single and 2 adjacent implant restorations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four implant restoration groups (first and second molars, single second molars, posterior single restorations between teeth, and anterior single restorations between teeth) were randomly chosen from one dental institute. Each group comprised of 6 patients. After 6 months of function, silicone impressions were taken and stone models were fabricated for each restoration group. The stone models were cut in bucco-lingual direction at the most apical point of buccal gingival margin. The height and width of buccal supra-implant soft tissue were measured. One way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc tests were performed to analyze the data obtained (P < .05). RESULTS: The most unfavorable width-height ratio was noted for the group, which was comprised of the second molar in the multiple adjacent (first and second molar) implant-supported restorations. The group also resulted in the shorter height of buccal supra-implant mucosa rather than that of anterior single implant restorations between natural teeth. CONCLUSION: To achieve a favorable level of buccal gingival margin, greater thickness of buccal supra-implant mucosa is required for the implant restorations without a neighboring natural tooth compared to the implant restorations next to a natural tooth. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2009-11 2009-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2994692/ /pubmed/21165270 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2009.1.3.140 Text en Copyright © 2009 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Young-Bum
Shim, June-Sung
Han, Chong-Hyun
Kim, Sun-Jai
The level of buccal gingival margin around single and two adjacent implant restorations: a preliminary result
title The level of buccal gingival margin around single and two adjacent implant restorations: a preliminary result
title_full The level of buccal gingival margin around single and two adjacent implant restorations: a preliminary result
title_fullStr The level of buccal gingival margin around single and two adjacent implant restorations: a preliminary result
title_full_unstemmed The level of buccal gingival margin around single and two adjacent implant restorations: a preliminary result
title_short The level of buccal gingival margin around single and two adjacent implant restorations: a preliminary result
title_sort level of buccal gingival margin around single and two adjacent implant restorations: a preliminary result
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2994692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21165270
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2009.1.3.140
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyoungbum thelevelofbuccalgingivalmarginaroundsingleandtwoadjacentimplantrestorationsapreliminaryresult
AT shimjunesung thelevelofbuccalgingivalmarginaroundsingleandtwoadjacentimplantrestorationsapreliminaryresult
AT hanchonghyun thelevelofbuccalgingivalmarginaroundsingleandtwoadjacentimplantrestorationsapreliminaryresult
AT kimsunjai thelevelofbuccalgingivalmarginaroundsingleandtwoadjacentimplantrestorationsapreliminaryresult
AT kimyoungbum levelofbuccalgingivalmarginaroundsingleandtwoadjacentimplantrestorationsapreliminaryresult
AT shimjunesung levelofbuccalgingivalmarginaroundsingleandtwoadjacentimplantrestorationsapreliminaryresult
AT hanchonghyun levelofbuccalgingivalmarginaroundsingleandtwoadjacentimplantrestorationsapreliminaryresult
AT kimsunjai levelofbuccalgingivalmarginaroundsingleandtwoadjacentimplantrestorationsapreliminaryresult