Cargando…

The importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery - a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to analyze whether routine radiological controls of anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract an early detection of anastomotic leaks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 135 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal tract surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doerfer, Joerg, Meyer, Thomas, Klein, Peter, Melling, Nathaniel, Kerscher, Alexander G, Hohenberger, Werner, Pelz, Joerg OW
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2994795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21070633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-4-17
_version_ 1782192999806009344
author Doerfer, Joerg
Meyer, Thomas
Klein, Peter
Melling, Nathaniel
Kerscher, Alexander G
Hohenberger, Werner
Pelz, Joerg OW
author_facet Doerfer, Joerg
Meyer, Thomas
Klein, Peter
Melling, Nathaniel
Kerscher, Alexander G
Hohenberger, Werner
Pelz, Joerg OW
author_sort Doerfer, Joerg
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to analyze whether routine radiological controls of anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract an early detection of anastomotic leaks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 135 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal tract surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Patients in the first group (n = 55) underwent routine radiological control of the anastomoses. In the second group (n = 80) the radiological control was only performed in case of clinical symptoms or signs of anastomotic leaks. RESULTS: The incidence of anastomotic leaks in the patients seen by us was 5.2%, equivalent to 7 of 135 patients In Group 1 leaks were seen in 4 of 55 patients (7,2%) in group 2 leaks were seen in 3 of 80 (3,8%). The radiological control of the anastomoses with contrast swallow showed the leakage in two cases. Twice the results were false negative. The sensitivity of computed tomography was 100%. DISCUSSION: Routine radiological control of anastomoses with contrast swallow only has low sensitivity. This procedure should not be performed routinely any more. The radiological control should be used in cases with signs of anastomotic leakage or with postoperatively impaired gastrointestinal passage.
format Text
id pubmed-2994795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29947952010-12-01 The importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery - a retrospective cohort study Doerfer, Joerg Meyer, Thomas Klein, Peter Melling, Nathaniel Kerscher, Alexander G Hohenberger, Werner Pelz, Joerg OW Patient Saf Surg Research INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to analyze whether routine radiological controls of anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract an early detection of anastomotic leaks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 135 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal tract surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Patients in the first group (n = 55) underwent routine radiological control of the anastomoses. In the second group (n = 80) the radiological control was only performed in case of clinical symptoms or signs of anastomotic leaks. RESULTS: The incidence of anastomotic leaks in the patients seen by us was 5.2%, equivalent to 7 of 135 patients In Group 1 leaks were seen in 4 of 55 patients (7,2%) in group 2 leaks were seen in 3 of 80 (3,8%). The radiological control of the anastomoses with contrast swallow showed the leakage in two cases. Twice the results were false negative. The sensitivity of computed tomography was 100%. DISCUSSION: Routine radiological control of anastomoses with contrast swallow only has low sensitivity. This procedure should not be performed routinely any more. The radiological control should be used in cases with signs of anastomotic leakage or with postoperatively impaired gastrointestinal passage. BioMed Central 2010-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2994795/ /pubmed/21070633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-4-17 Text en Copyright ©2010 Doerfer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Doerfer, Joerg
Meyer, Thomas
Klein, Peter
Melling, Nathaniel
Kerscher, Alexander G
Hohenberger, Werner
Pelz, Joerg OW
The importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery - a retrospective cohort study
title The importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery - a retrospective cohort study
title_full The importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery - a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr The importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery - a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery - a retrospective cohort study
title_short The importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery - a retrospective cohort study
title_sort importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery - a retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2994795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21070633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-4-17
work_keys_str_mv AT doerferjoerg theimportanceofradiologicalcontrolsofanastomosesafteruppergastrointestinaltractsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT meyerthomas theimportanceofradiologicalcontrolsofanastomosesafteruppergastrointestinaltractsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kleinpeter theimportanceofradiologicalcontrolsofanastomosesafteruppergastrointestinaltractsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mellingnathaniel theimportanceofradiologicalcontrolsofanastomosesafteruppergastrointestinaltractsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kerscheralexanderg theimportanceofradiologicalcontrolsofanastomosesafteruppergastrointestinaltractsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hohenbergerwerner theimportanceofradiologicalcontrolsofanastomosesafteruppergastrointestinaltractsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT pelzjoergow theimportanceofradiologicalcontrolsofanastomosesafteruppergastrointestinaltractsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT doerferjoerg importanceofradiologicalcontrolsofanastomosesafteruppergastrointestinaltractsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT meyerthomas importanceofradiologicalcontrolsofanastomosesafteruppergastrointestinaltractsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kleinpeter importanceofradiologicalcontrolsofanastomosesafteruppergastrointestinaltractsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mellingnathaniel importanceofradiologicalcontrolsofanastomosesafteruppergastrointestinaltractsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kerscheralexanderg importanceofradiologicalcontrolsofanastomosesafteruppergastrointestinaltractsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hohenbergerwerner importanceofradiologicalcontrolsofanastomosesafteruppergastrointestinaltractsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT pelzjoergow importanceofradiologicalcontrolsofanastomosesafteruppergastrointestinaltractsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy