Cargando…

Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study

Objectives To determine the extent to which referral for defined symptoms from primary care varies by age, sex, and social deprivation and whether any sociodemographic variations in referral differ according to the presence of national referral guidance and the potential of the symptoms to be life t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McBride, Dulcie, Hardoon, Sarah, Walters, Kate, Gilmour, Stuart, Raine, Rosalind
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2995017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21118873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6267
_version_ 1782193031222394880
author McBride, Dulcie
Hardoon, Sarah
Walters, Kate
Gilmour, Stuart
Raine, Rosalind
author_facet McBride, Dulcie
Hardoon, Sarah
Walters, Kate
Gilmour, Stuart
Raine, Rosalind
author_sort McBride, Dulcie
collection PubMed
description Objectives To determine the extent to which referral for defined symptoms from primary care varies by age, sex, and social deprivation and whether any sociodemographic variations in referral differ according to the presence of national referral guidance and the potential of the symptoms to be life threatening. Design Cohort study using individual patient data from the health improvement network database in primary care. Setting United Kingdom. Participants 5492 patients with postmenopausal bleeding, 23 121 with hip pain, and 101 212 with dyspepsia from 326 general practices, 2001-7. Main outcome measures Multivariable associations between odds of immediate referral for postmenopausal bleeding and age and social deprivation; hazard rates of referral for hip pain or dyspepsia and age, sex, and social deprivation. Analyses for dyspepsia were stratified for people aged less than and more than 55 years because referral guidance differs by age. Results 61.4% (3374/5492) of patients with postmenopausal bleeding, 17.4% (4019/23 121) with hip pain, and 13.8% (13 944/101 212) with dyspepsia were referred. The likelihood of referral for postmenopausal bleeding declined with increasing age: the adjusted odds ratio for patients aged 85 or more compared with those aged 55-64 was 0.39 (95% confidence interval 0.31 to 0.49). Patients aged 85 or more with hip pain were also less likely to be referred than those aged 55-64 (0.68, 0.57 to 0.81). Women were less likely than men to be referred for hip pain (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.96). More deprived patients with hip pain or dyspepsia (if aged <55) were less likely to be referred. Adjusted hazard ratios for those in the most deprived Townsend fifth compared with the least deprived were 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.82) and 0.76 (0.68 to 0.85), respectively. No socioeconomic gradient was evident in referral for postmenopausal bleeding. Conclusions Inequalities in referral associated with socioeconomic circumstances were more likely to occur in the absence of both explicit guidance and potentially life threatening conditions, whereas inequalities with age were evident for all conditions.
format Text
id pubmed-2995017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29950172010-12-07 Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study McBride, Dulcie Hardoon, Sarah Walters, Kate Gilmour, Stuart Raine, Rosalind BMJ Research Objectives To determine the extent to which referral for defined symptoms from primary care varies by age, sex, and social deprivation and whether any sociodemographic variations in referral differ according to the presence of national referral guidance and the potential of the symptoms to be life threatening. Design Cohort study using individual patient data from the health improvement network database in primary care. Setting United Kingdom. Participants 5492 patients with postmenopausal bleeding, 23 121 with hip pain, and 101 212 with dyspepsia from 326 general practices, 2001-7. Main outcome measures Multivariable associations between odds of immediate referral for postmenopausal bleeding and age and social deprivation; hazard rates of referral for hip pain or dyspepsia and age, sex, and social deprivation. Analyses for dyspepsia were stratified for people aged less than and more than 55 years because referral guidance differs by age. Results 61.4% (3374/5492) of patients with postmenopausal bleeding, 17.4% (4019/23 121) with hip pain, and 13.8% (13 944/101 212) with dyspepsia were referred. The likelihood of referral for postmenopausal bleeding declined with increasing age: the adjusted odds ratio for patients aged 85 or more compared with those aged 55-64 was 0.39 (95% confidence interval 0.31 to 0.49). Patients aged 85 or more with hip pain were also less likely to be referred than those aged 55-64 (0.68, 0.57 to 0.81). Women were less likely than men to be referred for hip pain (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.96). More deprived patients with hip pain or dyspepsia (if aged <55) were less likely to be referred. Adjusted hazard ratios for those in the most deprived Townsend fifth compared with the least deprived were 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.82) and 0.76 (0.68 to 0.85), respectively. No socioeconomic gradient was evident in referral for postmenopausal bleeding. Conclusions Inequalities in referral associated with socioeconomic circumstances were more likely to occur in the absence of both explicit guidance and potentially life threatening conditions, whereas inequalities with age were evident for all conditions. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2995017/ /pubmed/21118873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6267 Text en © McBride et al 2010 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
McBride, Dulcie
Hardoon, Sarah
Walters, Kate
Gilmour, Stuart
Raine, Rosalind
Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study
title Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study
title_full Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study
title_fullStr Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study
title_short Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study
title_sort explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2995017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21118873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6267
work_keys_str_mv AT mcbridedulcie explainingvariationinreferralfromprimarytosecondarycarecohortstudy
AT hardoonsarah explainingvariationinreferralfromprimarytosecondarycarecohortstudy
AT walterskate explainingvariationinreferralfromprimarytosecondarycarecohortstudy
AT gilmourstuart explainingvariationinreferralfromprimarytosecondarycarecohortstudy
AT rainerosalind explainingvariationinreferralfromprimarytosecondarycarecohortstudy