Cargando…

Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial

Objective To evaluate the cost effectiveness, cost utility, and cost-benefit of an integrated care programme compared with usual care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain. Design Economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial with 12 months’ follow-up. Setting Primary car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambeek, Ludeke C, Bosmans, Judith E, Van Royen, Barend J, Van Tulder, Maurits W, Van Mechelen, Willem, Anema, Johannes R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2995018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21118874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6414
_version_ 1782193031479296000
author Lambeek, Ludeke C
Bosmans, Judith E
Van Royen, Barend J
Van Tulder, Maurits W
Van Mechelen, Willem
Anema, Johannes R
author_facet Lambeek, Ludeke C
Bosmans, Judith E
Van Royen, Barend J
Van Tulder, Maurits W
Van Mechelen, Willem
Anema, Johannes R
author_sort Lambeek, Ludeke C
collection PubMed
description Objective To evaluate the cost effectiveness, cost utility, and cost-benefit of an integrated care programme compared with usual care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain. Design Economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial with 12 months’ follow-up. Setting Primary care (10 physiotherapy practices, one occupational health service, one occupational therapy practice) and secondary care (five hospitals) in the Netherlands, 2005-9. Participants 134 adults aged 18-65 sick listed because of chronic low back pain: 66 were randomised to integrated care and 68 to usual care. Interventions Integrated care consisted of a workplace intervention based on participatory ergonomics, with involvement of a supervisor, and a graded activity programme based on cognitive behavioural principles. Usual care was provided by general practitioners and occupational physicians according to Dutch guidelines. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was duration until sustainable return to work. The secondary outcome was quality adjusted life years (QALYs), measured using EuroQol. Results Total costs in the integrated care group (£13 165, SD £13 600) were significantly lower than in the usual care group (£18 475, SD £13 616). Cost effectiveness planes and acceptability curves showed that integrated care was cost effective compared with usual care for return to work and QALYs gained. The cost-benefit analyses showed that every £1 invested in integrated care would return an estimated £26. The net societal benefit of integrated care compared with usual care was £5744. Conclusions Implementation of an integrated care programme for patients sick listed with chronic low back pain has a large potential to significantly reduce societal costs, increase effectiveness of care, improve quality of life, and improve function on a broad scale. Integrated care therefore has large gains for patients and society as well as for employers.
format Text
id pubmed-2995018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29950182010-12-07 Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial Lambeek, Ludeke C Bosmans, Judith E Van Royen, Barend J Van Tulder, Maurits W Van Mechelen, Willem Anema, Johannes R BMJ Research Objective To evaluate the cost effectiveness, cost utility, and cost-benefit of an integrated care programme compared with usual care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain. Design Economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial with 12 months’ follow-up. Setting Primary care (10 physiotherapy practices, one occupational health service, one occupational therapy practice) and secondary care (five hospitals) in the Netherlands, 2005-9. Participants 134 adults aged 18-65 sick listed because of chronic low back pain: 66 were randomised to integrated care and 68 to usual care. Interventions Integrated care consisted of a workplace intervention based on participatory ergonomics, with involvement of a supervisor, and a graded activity programme based on cognitive behavioural principles. Usual care was provided by general practitioners and occupational physicians according to Dutch guidelines. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was duration until sustainable return to work. The secondary outcome was quality adjusted life years (QALYs), measured using EuroQol. Results Total costs in the integrated care group (£13 165, SD £13 600) were significantly lower than in the usual care group (£18 475, SD £13 616). Cost effectiveness planes and acceptability curves showed that integrated care was cost effective compared with usual care for return to work and QALYs gained. The cost-benefit analyses showed that every £1 invested in integrated care would return an estimated £26. The net societal benefit of integrated care compared with usual care was £5744. Conclusions Implementation of an integrated care programme for patients sick listed with chronic low back pain has a large potential to significantly reduce societal costs, increase effectiveness of care, improve quality of life, and improve function on a broad scale. Integrated care therefore has large gains for patients and society as well as for employers. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2995018/ /pubmed/21118874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6414 Text en © Lambeek et al 2010 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Lambeek, Ludeke C
Bosmans, Judith E
Van Royen, Barend J
Van Tulder, Maurits W
Van Mechelen, Willem
Anema, Johannes R
Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
title Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_full Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_short Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_sort effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2995018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21118874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6414
work_keys_str_mv AT lambeekludekec effectofintegratedcareforsicklistedpatientswithchroniclowbackpaineconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bosmansjudithe effectofintegratedcareforsicklistedpatientswithchroniclowbackpaineconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanroyenbarendj effectofintegratedcareforsicklistedpatientswithchroniclowbackpaineconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vantuldermauritsw effectofintegratedcareforsicklistedpatientswithchroniclowbackpaineconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanmechelenwillem effectofintegratedcareforsicklistedpatientswithchroniclowbackpaineconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT anemajohannesr effectofintegratedcareforsicklistedpatientswithchroniclowbackpaineconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial