Cargando…
Assessment of splenic function
Hyposplenic patients are at risk of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI), which carries mortality of up to 70%. Therefore, preventive measures are warranted. However, patients with diminished splenic function are difficult to identify. In this review we discuss immunological, haematologica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2995208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20853172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1049-1 |
_version_ | 1782193065660776448 |
---|---|
author | de Porto, A. P. N. A. Lammers, A. J. J. Bennink, R. J. ten Berge, I. J. M. Speelman, P. Hoekstra, J. B. L. |
author_facet | de Porto, A. P. N. A. Lammers, A. J. J. Bennink, R. J. ten Berge, I. J. M. Speelman, P. Hoekstra, J. B. L. |
author_sort | de Porto, A. P. N. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hyposplenic patients are at risk of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI), which carries mortality of up to 70%. Therefore, preventive measures are warranted. However, patients with diminished splenic function are difficult to identify. In this review we discuss immunological, haematological and scintigraphic parameters that can be used to measure splenic function. IgM memory B cells are a potential parameter for assessing splenic function; however, more studies are necessary for its validation. Detection of Howell–Jolly bodies does not reflect splenic function accurately, whereas determining the percentage of pitted erythrocytes is a well-evaluated method and seems a good first-line investigation for assessing splenic function. When assessing spleen function, (99m)Tc-labelled, heat-altered, autologous erythrocyte scintigraphy with multimodality single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-CT technology is the best approach, as all facets of splenic function are evaluated. In conclusion, although scintigraphic methods are most reliable, they are not suitable for screening large populations. We therefore recommend using the percentage of pitted erythrocytes, albeit suboptimal, as a first-line investigation and subsequently confirming abnormal readings by means of scintigraphy. More studies evaluating the value of potentially new markers are needed. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2995208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29952082011-01-04 Assessment of splenic function de Porto, A. P. N. A. Lammers, A. J. J. Bennink, R. J. ten Berge, I. J. M. Speelman, P. Hoekstra, J. B. L. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Review Hyposplenic patients are at risk of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI), which carries mortality of up to 70%. Therefore, preventive measures are warranted. However, patients with diminished splenic function are difficult to identify. In this review we discuss immunological, haematological and scintigraphic parameters that can be used to measure splenic function. IgM memory B cells are a potential parameter for assessing splenic function; however, more studies are necessary for its validation. Detection of Howell–Jolly bodies does not reflect splenic function accurately, whereas determining the percentage of pitted erythrocytes is a well-evaluated method and seems a good first-line investigation for assessing splenic function. When assessing spleen function, (99m)Tc-labelled, heat-altered, autologous erythrocyte scintigraphy with multimodality single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-CT technology is the best approach, as all facets of splenic function are evaluated. In conclusion, although scintigraphic methods are most reliable, they are not suitable for screening large populations. We therefore recommend using the percentage of pitted erythrocytes, albeit suboptimal, as a first-line investigation and subsequently confirming abnormal readings by means of scintigraphy. More studies evaluating the value of potentially new markers are needed. Springer-Verlag 2010-09-19 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2995208/ /pubmed/20853172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1049-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review de Porto, A. P. N. A. Lammers, A. J. J. Bennink, R. J. ten Berge, I. J. M. Speelman, P. Hoekstra, J. B. L. Assessment of splenic function |
title | Assessment of splenic function |
title_full | Assessment of splenic function |
title_fullStr | Assessment of splenic function |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of splenic function |
title_short | Assessment of splenic function |
title_sort | assessment of splenic function |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2995208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20853172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1049-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deportoapna assessmentofsplenicfunction AT lammersajj assessmentofsplenicfunction AT benninkrj assessmentofsplenicfunction AT tenbergeijm assessmentofsplenicfunction AT speelmanp assessmentofsplenicfunction AT hoekstrajbl assessmentofsplenicfunction |