Cargando…

Assessment of splenic function

Hyposplenic patients are at risk of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI), which carries mortality of up to 70%. Therefore, preventive measures are warranted. However, patients with diminished splenic function are difficult to identify. In this review we discuss immunological, haematologica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Porto, A. P. N. A., Lammers, A. J. J., Bennink, R. J., ten Berge, I. J. M., Speelman, P., Hoekstra, J. B. L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2995208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20853172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1049-1
_version_ 1782193065660776448
author de Porto, A. P. N. A.
Lammers, A. J. J.
Bennink, R. J.
ten Berge, I. J. M.
Speelman, P.
Hoekstra, J. B. L.
author_facet de Porto, A. P. N. A.
Lammers, A. J. J.
Bennink, R. J.
ten Berge, I. J. M.
Speelman, P.
Hoekstra, J. B. L.
author_sort de Porto, A. P. N. A.
collection PubMed
description Hyposplenic patients are at risk of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI), which carries mortality of up to 70%. Therefore, preventive measures are warranted. However, patients with diminished splenic function are difficult to identify. In this review we discuss immunological, haematological and scintigraphic parameters that can be used to measure splenic function. IgM memory B cells are a potential parameter for assessing splenic function; however, more studies are necessary for its validation. Detection of Howell–Jolly bodies does not reflect splenic function accurately, whereas determining the percentage of pitted erythrocytes is a well-evaluated method and seems a good first-line investigation for assessing splenic function. When assessing spleen function, (99m)Tc-labelled, heat-altered, autologous erythrocyte scintigraphy with multimodality single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-CT technology is the best approach, as all facets of splenic function are evaluated. In conclusion, although scintigraphic methods are most reliable, they are not suitable for screening large populations. We therefore recommend using the percentage of pitted erythrocytes, albeit suboptimal, as a first-line investigation and subsequently confirming abnormal readings by means of scintigraphy. More studies evaluating the value of potentially new markers are needed.
format Text
id pubmed-2995208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29952082011-01-04 Assessment of splenic function de Porto, A. P. N. A. Lammers, A. J. J. Bennink, R. J. ten Berge, I. J. M. Speelman, P. Hoekstra, J. B. L. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Review Hyposplenic patients are at risk of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI), which carries mortality of up to 70%. Therefore, preventive measures are warranted. However, patients with diminished splenic function are difficult to identify. In this review we discuss immunological, haematological and scintigraphic parameters that can be used to measure splenic function. IgM memory B cells are a potential parameter for assessing splenic function; however, more studies are necessary for its validation. Detection of Howell–Jolly bodies does not reflect splenic function accurately, whereas determining the percentage of pitted erythrocytes is a well-evaluated method and seems a good first-line investigation for assessing splenic function. When assessing spleen function, (99m)Tc-labelled, heat-altered, autologous erythrocyte scintigraphy with multimodality single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-CT technology is the best approach, as all facets of splenic function are evaluated. In conclusion, although scintigraphic methods are most reliable, they are not suitable for screening large populations. We therefore recommend using the percentage of pitted erythrocytes, albeit suboptimal, as a first-line investigation and subsequently confirming abnormal readings by means of scintigraphy. More studies evaluating the value of potentially new markers are needed. Springer-Verlag 2010-09-19 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2995208/ /pubmed/20853172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1049-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
de Porto, A. P. N. A.
Lammers, A. J. J.
Bennink, R. J.
ten Berge, I. J. M.
Speelman, P.
Hoekstra, J. B. L.
Assessment of splenic function
title Assessment of splenic function
title_full Assessment of splenic function
title_fullStr Assessment of splenic function
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of splenic function
title_short Assessment of splenic function
title_sort assessment of splenic function
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2995208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20853172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1049-1
work_keys_str_mv AT deportoapna assessmentofsplenicfunction
AT lammersajj assessmentofsplenicfunction
AT benninkrj assessmentofsplenicfunction
AT tenbergeijm assessmentofsplenicfunction
AT speelmanp assessmentofsplenicfunction
AT hoekstrajbl assessmentofsplenicfunction