Cargando…

The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay

BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes (T1D), a prototypic autoimmune disease, effector T cells destroy beta cells. Normally, CD4(+)CD25(+high), or natural regulatory T cells (Tregs), counter this assault. In autoimmunity, the failure to suppress CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells is important for disease development....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jana, Srikanta, Campbell, Hope, Woodliff, Jeffrey, Waukau, Jill, Jailwala, Parthav, Ghorai, Jugal, Ghosh, Soumitra, Glisic, Sanja
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2997082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015154
_version_ 1782193267655311360
author Jana, Srikanta
Campbell, Hope
Woodliff, Jeffrey
Waukau, Jill
Jailwala, Parthav
Ghorai, Jugal
Ghosh, Soumitra
Glisic, Sanja
author_facet Jana, Srikanta
Campbell, Hope
Woodliff, Jeffrey
Waukau, Jill
Jailwala, Parthav
Ghorai, Jugal
Ghosh, Soumitra
Glisic, Sanja
author_sort Jana, Srikanta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes (T1D), a prototypic autoimmune disease, effector T cells destroy beta cells. Normally, CD4(+)CD25(+high), or natural regulatory T cells (Tregs), counter this assault. In autoimmunity, the failure to suppress CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells is important for disease development. However, both Treg dysfunction and hyperactive responder T-cell proliferation contribute to disease. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We investigated human CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells and compared them to CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells in otherwise equivalent in vitro proliferative conditions. We then asked whether these differences in suppression are exacerbated in T1D. In both single and co-culture with Tregs, the CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells divided more rapidly than CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells, which manifests as increased proliferation/reduced suppression. Time-course experiments showed that this difference could be explained by higher IL-2 production from CD4+CD25(low) compared to CD4+CD25- T cells. There was also a significant increase in CD4+CD25(low) T-cell proliferation compared to CD4+CD25- T cells during suppression assays from RO T1D and at-risk subjects (n = 28, p = 0.015 and p = 0.024 respectively). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The in vitro dual suppression assays proposed here could highlight the impaired sensitivity of certain responder T cells to the suppressive effect of Tregs in human autoimmune diseases.
format Text
id pubmed-2997082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29970822010-12-10 The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay Jana, Srikanta Campbell, Hope Woodliff, Jeffrey Waukau, Jill Jailwala, Parthav Ghorai, Jugal Ghosh, Soumitra Glisic, Sanja PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes (T1D), a prototypic autoimmune disease, effector T cells destroy beta cells. Normally, CD4(+)CD25(+high), or natural regulatory T cells (Tregs), counter this assault. In autoimmunity, the failure to suppress CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells is important for disease development. However, both Treg dysfunction and hyperactive responder T-cell proliferation contribute to disease. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We investigated human CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells and compared them to CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells in otherwise equivalent in vitro proliferative conditions. We then asked whether these differences in suppression are exacerbated in T1D. In both single and co-culture with Tregs, the CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells divided more rapidly than CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells, which manifests as increased proliferation/reduced suppression. Time-course experiments showed that this difference could be explained by higher IL-2 production from CD4+CD25(low) compared to CD4+CD25- T cells. There was also a significant increase in CD4+CD25(low) T-cell proliferation compared to CD4+CD25- T cells during suppression assays from RO T1D and at-risk subjects (n = 28, p = 0.015 and p = 0.024 respectively). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The in vitro dual suppression assays proposed here could highlight the impaired sensitivity of certain responder T cells to the suppressive effect of Tregs in human autoimmune diseases. Public Library of Science 2010-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2997082/ /pubmed/21151941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015154 Text en Jana et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jana, Srikanta
Campbell, Hope
Woodliff, Jeffrey
Waukau, Jill
Jailwala, Parthav
Ghorai, Jugal
Ghosh, Soumitra
Glisic, Sanja
The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay
title The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay
title_full The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay
title_fullStr The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay
title_full_unstemmed The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay
title_short The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay
title_sort type of responder t-cell has a significant impact in a human in vitro suppression assay
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2997082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015154
work_keys_str_mv AT janasrikanta thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT campbellhope thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT woodliffjeffrey thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT waukaujill thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT jailwalaparthav thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT ghoraijugal thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT ghoshsoumitra thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT glisicsanja thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT janasrikanta typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT campbellhope typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT woodliffjeffrey typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT waukaujill typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT jailwalaparthav typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT ghoraijugal typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT ghoshsoumitra typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay
AT glisicsanja typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay