Cargando…
The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay
BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes (T1D), a prototypic autoimmune disease, effector T cells destroy beta cells. Normally, CD4(+)CD25(+high), or natural regulatory T cells (Tregs), counter this assault. In autoimmunity, the failure to suppress CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells is important for disease development....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2997082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015154 |
_version_ | 1782193267655311360 |
---|---|
author | Jana, Srikanta Campbell, Hope Woodliff, Jeffrey Waukau, Jill Jailwala, Parthav Ghorai, Jugal Ghosh, Soumitra Glisic, Sanja |
author_facet | Jana, Srikanta Campbell, Hope Woodliff, Jeffrey Waukau, Jill Jailwala, Parthav Ghorai, Jugal Ghosh, Soumitra Glisic, Sanja |
author_sort | Jana, Srikanta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes (T1D), a prototypic autoimmune disease, effector T cells destroy beta cells. Normally, CD4(+)CD25(+high), or natural regulatory T cells (Tregs), counter this assault. In autoimmunity, the failure to suppress CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells is important for disease development. However, both Treg dysfunction and hyperactive responder T-cell proliferation contribute to disease. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We investigated human CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells and compared them to CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells in otherwise equivalent in vitro proliferative conditions. We then asked whether these differences in suppression are exacerbated in T1D. In both single and co-culture with Tregs, the CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells divided more rapidly than CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells, which manifests as increased proliferation/reduced suppression. Time-course experiments showed that this difference could be explained by higher IL-2 production from CD4+CD25(low) compared to CD4+CD25- T cells. There was also a significant increase in CD4+CD25(low) T-cell proliferation compared to CD4+CD25- T cells during suppression assays from RO T1D and at-risk subjects (n = 28, p = 0.015 and p = 0.024 respectively). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The in vitro dual suppression assays proposed here could highlight the impaired sensitivity of certain responder T cells to the suppressive effect of Tregs in human autoimmune diseases. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2997082 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29970822010-12-10 The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay Jana, Srikanta Campbell, Hope Woodliff, Jeffrey Waukau, Jill Jailwala, Parthav Ghorai, Jugal Ghosh, Soumitra Glisic, Sanja PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes (T1D), a prototypic autoimmune disease, effector T cells destroy beta cells. Normally, CD4(+)CD25(+high), or natural regulatory T cells (Tregs), counter this assault. In autoimmunity, the failure to suppress CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells is important for disease development. However, both Treg dysfunction and hyperactive responder T-cell proliferation contribute to disease. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We investigated human CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells and compared them to CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells in otherwise equivalent in vitro proliferative conditions. We then asked whether these differences in suppression are exacerbated in T1D. In both single and co-culture with Tregs, the CD4(+)CD25(low) T cells divided more rapidly than CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells, which manifests as increased proliferation/reduced suppression. Time-course experiments showed that this difference could be explained by higher IL-2 production from CD4+CD25(low) compared to CD4+CD25- T cells. There was also a significant increase in CD4+CD25(low) T-cell proliferation compared to CD4+CD25- T cells during suppression assays from RO T1D and at-risk subjects (n = 28, p = 0.015 and p = 0.024 respectively). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The in vitro dual suppression assays proposed here could highlight the impaired sensitivity of certain responder T cells to the suppressive effect of Tregs in human autoimmune diseases. Public Library of Science 2010-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2997082/ /pubmed/21151941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015154 Text en Jana et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jana, Srikanta Campbell, Hope Woodliff, Jeffrey Waukau, Jill Jailwala, Parthav Ghorai, Jugal Ghosh, Soumitra Glisic, Sanja The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay |
title | The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay |
title_full | The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay |
title_fullStr | The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay |
title_full_unstemmed | The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay |
title_short | The Type of Responder T-Cell Has a Significant Impact in a Human In Vitro Suppression Assay |
title_sort | type of responder t-cell has a significant impact in a human in vitro suppression assay |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2997082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015154 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janasrikanta thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT campbellhope thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT woodliffjeffrey thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT waukaujill thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT jailwalaparthav thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT ghoraijugal thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT ghoshsoumitra thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT glisicsanja thetypeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT janasrikanta typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT campbellhope typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT woodliffjeffrey typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT waukaujill typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT jailwalaparthav typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT ghoraijugal typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT ghoshsoumitra typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay AT glisicsanja typeofrespondertcellhasasignificantimpactinahumaninvitrosuppressionassay |