Cargando…

Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials in two meditative mental states

CONTEXT: Practicing mental repetition of “OM” has been shown to cause significant changes in the middle latency auditory-evoked potentials, which suggests that it facilitates the neural activity at the mesencephalic or diencephalic levels. AIMS: The aim of the study was to study the brainstem audito...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Sanjay, Nagendra, HR, Naveen, KV, Manjunath, NK, Telles, Shirley
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2997230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21170228
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6131.72628
_version_ 1782193278588813312
author Kumar, Sanjay
Nagendra, HR
Naveen, KV
Manjunath, NK
Telles, Shirley
author_facet Kumar, Sanjay
Nagendra, HR
Naveen, KV
Manjunath, NK
Telles, Shirley
author_sort Kumar, Sanjay
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Practicing mental repetition of “OM” has been shown to cause significant changes in the middle latency auditory-evoked potentials, which suggests that it facilitates the neural activity at the mesencephalic or diencephalic levels. AIMS: The aim of the study was to study the brainstem auditory-evoked potentials (BAEP) in two meditation states based on consciousness, viz. dharana, and dhyana. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty subjects were selected, with ages ranging from 20 to 55 years (M=29.1; ±SD=6.5 years) who had a minimum of 6 months experience in meditating “OM”. Each subject was assessed in four sessions, i.e. two meditation and two control sessions. The two control sessions were: (i) ekagrata, i.e. single-topic lecture on meditation and (ii) cancalata, i.e. non-targeted thinking. The two meditation sessions were: (i) dharana, i.e. focusing on the symbol “OM” and (ii) dhyana, i.e. effortless single-thought state “OM”. All four sessions were recorded on four different days and consisted of three states, i.e. pre, during and post. RESULTS: The present results showed that the wave V peak latency significantly increased in cancalata, ekagrata and dharana, but no change occurred during the dhyana session. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that information transmission along the auditory pathway is delayed during cancalata, ekagrata and dharana, but there is no change during dhyana. It may be said that auditory information transmission was delayed at the inferior collicular level as the wave V corresponds to the tectum.
format Text
id pubmed-2997230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29972302010-12-17 Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials in two meditative mental states Kumar, Sanjay Nagendra, HR Naveen, KV Manjunath, NK Telles, Shirley Int J Yoga Original Article CONTEXT: Practicing mental repetition of “OM” has been shown to cause significant changes in the middle latency auditory-evoked potentials, which suggests that it facilitates the neural activity at the mesencephalic or diencephalic levels. AIMS: The aim of the study was to study the brainstem auditory-evoked potentials (BAEP) in two meditation states based on consciousness, viz. dharana, and dhyana. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty subjects were selected, with ages ranging from 20 to 55 years (M=29.1; ±SD=6.5 years) who had a minimum of 6 months experience in meditating “OM”. Each subject was assessed in four sessions, i.e. two meditation and two control sessions. The two control sessions were: (i) ekagrata, i.e. single-topic lecture on meditation and (ii) cancalata, i.e. non-targeted thinking. The two meditation sessions were: (i) dharana, i.e. focusing on the symbol “OM” and (ii) dhyana, i.e. effortless single-thought state “OM”. All four sessions were recorded on four different days and consisted of three states, i.e. pre, during and post. RESULTS: The present results showed that the wave V peak latency significantly increased in cancalata, ekagrata and dharana, but no change occurred during the dhyana session. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that information transmission along the auditory pathway is delayed during cancalata, ekagrata and dharana, but there is no change during dhyana. It may be said that auditory information transmission was delayed at the inferior collicular level as the wave V corresponds to the tectum. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2997230/ /pubmed/21170228 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6131.72628 Text en © International Journal of Yoga http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, Sanjay
Nagendra, HR
Naveen, KV
Manjunath, NK
Telles, Shirley
Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials in two meditative mental states
title Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials in two meditative mental states
title_full Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials in two meditative mental states
title_fullStr Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials in two meditative mental states
title_full_unstemmed Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials in two meditative mental states
title_short Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials in two meditative mental states
title_sort brainstem auditory-evoked potentials in two meditative mental states
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2997230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21170228
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6131.72628
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarsanjay brainstemauditoryevokedpotentialsintwomeditativementalstates
AT nagendrahr brainstemauditoryevokedpotentialsintwomeditativementalstates
AT naveenkv brainstemauditoryevokedpotentialsintwomeditativementalstates
AT manjunathnk brainstemauditoryevokedpotentialsintwomeditativementalstates
AT tellesshirley brainstemauditoryevokedpotentialsintwomeditativementalstates