Cargando…

Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila

Different protein secondary structure elements have different physicochemical properties and roles in the protein, which may determine their evolutionary flexibility. However, it is not clear to what extent protein structure affects the way Darwinian selection acts at the amino acid level. Using phy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridout, Kate E., Dixon, Christopher J., Filatov, Dmitry A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2997536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20624723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evq008
_version_ 1782193308255125504
author Ridout, Kate E.
Dixon, Christopher J.
Filatov, Dmitry A.
author_facet Ridout, Kate E.
Dixon, Christopher J.
Filatov, Dmitry A.
author_sort Ridout, Kate E.
collection PubMed
description Different protein secondary structure elements have different physicochemical properties and roles in the protein, which may determine their evolutionary flexibility. However, it is not clear to what extent protein structure affects the way Darwinian selection acts at the amino acid level. Using phylogeny-based likelihood tests for positive selection, we have examined the relationship between protein secondary structure and selection across six species of Drosophila. We find that amino acids that form disordered regions, such as random coils, are far more likely to be under positive selection than expected from their proportion in the proteins, and residues in helices and β-structures are subject to less positive selection than predicted. In addition, it appears that sites undergoing positive selection are more likely than expected to occur close to one another in the protein sequence. Finally, on a genome-wide scale, we have determined that positively selected sites are found more frequently toward the gene ends. Our results demonstrate that protein structures with a greater degree of organization and strong hydrophobicity, represented here as helices and β-structures, are less tolerant to molecular adaptation than disordered, hydrophilic regions, across a diverse set of proteins.
format Text
id pubmed-2997536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29975362010-12-07 Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila Ridout, Kate E. Dixon, Christopher J. Filatov, Dmitry A. Genome Biol Evol Research-Articles Different protein secondary structure elements have different physicochemical properties and roles in the protein, which may determine their evolutionary flexibility. However, it is not clear to what extent protein structure affects the way Darwinian selection acts at the amino acid level. Using phylogeny-based likelihood tests for positive selection, we have examined the relationship between protein secondary structure and selection across six species of Drosophila. We find that amino acids that form disordered regions, such as random coils, are far more likely to be under positive selection than expected from their proportion in the proteins, and residues in helices and β-structures are subject to less positive selection than predicted. In addition, it appears that sites undergoing positive selection are more likely than expected to occur close to one another in the protein sequence. Finally, on a genome-wide scale, we have determined that positively selected sites are found more frequently toward the gene ends. Our results demonstrate that protein structures with a greater degree of organization and strong hydrophobicity, represented here as helices and β-structures, are less tolerant to molecular adaptation than disordered, hydrophilic regions, across a diverse set of proteins. Oxford University Press 2010 2010-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2997536/ /pubmed/20624723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evq008 Text en © The Author(s) 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research-Articles
Ridout, Kate E.
Dixon, Christopher J.
Filatov, Dmitry A.
Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila
title Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila
title_full Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila
title_fullStr Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila
title_short Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila
title_sort positive selection differs between protein secondary structure elements in drosophila
topic Research-Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2997536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20624723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evq008
work_keys_str_mv AT ridoutkatee positiveselectiondiffersbetweenproteinsecondarystructureelementsindrosophila
AT dixonchristopherj positiveselectiondiffersbetweenproteinsecondarystructureelementsindrosophila
AT filatovdmitrya positiveselectiondiffersbetweenproteinsecondarystructureelementsindrosophila