Cargando…
Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila
Different protein secondary structure elements have different physicochemical properties and roles in the protein, which may determine their evolutionary flexibility. However, it is not clear to what extent protein structure affects the way Darwinian selection acts at the amino acid level. Using phy...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2997536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20624723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evq008 |
_version_ | 1782193308255125504 |
---|---|
author | Ridout, Kate E. Dixon, Christopher J. Filatov, Dmitry A. |
author_facet | Ridout, Kate E. Dixon, Christopher J. Filatov, Dmitry A. |
author_sort | Ridout, Kate E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Different protein secondary structure elements have different physicochemical properties and roles in the protein, which may determine their evolutionary flexibility. However, it is not clear to what extent protein structure affects the way Darwinian selection acts at the amino acid level. Using phylogeny-based likelihood tests for positive selection, we have examined the relationship between protein secondary structure and selection across six species of Drosophila. We find that amino acids that form disordered regions, such as random coils, are far more likely to be under positive selection than expected from their proportion in the proteins, and residues in helices and β-structures are subject to less positive selection than predicted. In addition, it appears that sites undergoing positive selection are more likely than expected to occur close to one another in the protein sequence. Finally, on a genome-wide scale, we have determined that positively selected sites are found more frequently toward the gene ends. Our results demonstrate that protein structures with a greater degree of organization and strong hydrophobicity, represented here as helices and β-structures, are less tolerant to molecular adaptation than disordered, hydrophilic regions, across a diverse set of proteins. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2997536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29975362010-12-07 Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila Ridout, Kate E. Dixon, Christopher J. Filatov, Dmitry A. Genome Biol Evol Research-Articles Different protein secondary structure elements have different physicochemical properties and roles in the protein, which may determine their evolutionary flexibility. However, it is not clear to what extent protein structure affects the way Darwinian selection acts at the amino acid level. Using phylogeny-based likelihood tests for positive selection, we have examined the relationship between protein secondary structure and selection across six species of Drosophila. We find that amino acids that form disordered regions, such as random coils, are far more likely to be under positive selection than expected from their proportion in the proteins, and residues in helices and β-structures are subject to less positive selection than predicted. In addition, it appears that sites undergoing positive selection are more likely than expected to occur close to one another in the protein sequence. Finally, on a genome-wide scale, we have determined that positively selected sites are found more frequently toward the gene ends. Our results demonstrate that protein structures with a greater degree of organization and strong hydrophobicity, represented here as helices and β-structures, are less tolerant to molecular adaptation than disordered, hydrophilic regions, across a diverse set of proteins. Oxford University Press 2010 2010-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2997536/ /pubmed/20624723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evq008 Text en © The Author(s) 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research-Articles Ridout, Kate E. Dixon, Christopher J. Filatov, Dmitry A. Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila |
title | Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila |
title_full | Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila |
title_fullStr | Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila |
title_full_unstemmed | Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila |
title_short | Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila |
title_sort | positive selection differs between protein secondary structure elements in drosophila |
topic | Research-Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2997536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20624723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evq008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ridoutkatee positiveselectiondiffersbetweenproteinsecondarystructureelementsindrosophila AT dixonchristopherj positiveselectiondiffersbetweenproteinsecondarystructureelementsindrosophila AT filatovdmitrya positiveselectiondiffersbetweenproteinsecondarystructureelementsindrosophila |