Cargando…

The Tree and Net Components of Prokaryote Evolution

Phylogenetic trees of individual genes of prokaryotes (archaea and bacteria) generally have different topologies, largely owing to extensive horizontal gene transfer (HGT), suggesting that the Tree of Life (TOL) should be replaced by a “net of life” as the paradigm of prokaryote evolution. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puigbò, Pere, Wolf, Yuri I., Koonin, Eugene V.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2997564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20889655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evq062
_version_ 1782193315149512704
author Puigbò, Pere
Wolf, Yuri I.
Koonin, Eugene V.
author_facet Puigbò, Pere
Wolf, Yuri I.
Koonin, Eugene V.
author_sort Puigbò, Pere
collection PubMed
description Phylogenetic trees of individual genes of prokaryotes (archaea and bacteria) generally have different topologies, largely owing to extensive horizontal gene transfer (HGT), suggesting that the Tree of Life (TOL) should be replaced by a “net of life” as the paradigm of prokaryote evolution. However, trees remain the natural representation of the histories of individual genes given the fundamentally bifurcating process of gene replication. Therefore, although no single tree can fully represent the evolution of prokaryote genomes, the complete picture of evolution will necessarily combine trees and nets. A quantitative measure of the signals of tree and net evolution is derived from an analysis of all quartets of species in all trees of the “Forest of Life” (FOL), which consists of approximately 7,000 phylogenetic trees for prokaryote genes including approximately 100 nearly universal trees (NUTs). Although diverse routes of net-like evolution collectively dominate the FOL, the pattern of tree-like evolution that reflects the consistent topologies of the NUTs is the most prominent coherent trend. We show that the contributions of tree-like and net-like evolutionary processes substantially differ across bacterial and archaeal lineages and between functional classes of genes. Evolutionary simulations indicate that the central tree-like signal cannot be realistically explained by a self-reinforcing pattern of biased HGT.
format Text
id pubmed-2997564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29975642010-12-06 The Tree and Net Components of Prokaryote Evolution Puigbò, Pere Wolf, Yuri I. Koonin, Eugene V. Genome Biol Evol Research Articles Phylogenetic trees of individual genes of prokaryotes (archaea and bacteria) generally have different topologies, largely owing to extensive horizontal gene transfer (HGT), suggesting that the Tree of Life (TOL) should be replaced by a “net of life” as the paradigm of prokaryote evolution. However, trees remain the natural representation of the histories of individual genes given the fundamentally bifurcating process of gene replication. Therefore, although no single tree can fully represent the evolution of prokaryote genomes, the complete picture of evolution will necessarily combine trees and nets. A quantitative measure of the signals of tree and net evolution is derived from an analysis of all quartets of species in all trees of the “Forest of Life” (FOL), which consists of approximately 7,000 phylogenetic trees for prokaryote genes including approximately 100 nearly universal trees (NUTs). Although diverse routes of net-like evolution collectively dominate the FOL, the pattern of tree-like evolution that reflects the consistent topologies of the NUTs is the most prominent coherent trend. We show that the contributions of tree-like and net-like evolutionary processes substantially differ across bacterial and archaeal lineages and between functional classes of genes. Evolutionary simulations indicate that the central tree-like signal cannot be realistically explained by a self-reinforcing pattern of biased HGT. Oxford University Press 2010 2010-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2997564/ /pubmed/20889655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evq062 Text en © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Puigbò, Pere
Wolf, Yuri I.
Koonin, Eugene V.
The Tree and Net Components of Prokaryote Evolution
title The Tree and Net Components of Prokaryote Evolution
title_full The Tree and Net Components of Prokaryote Evolution
title_fullStr The Tree and Net Components of Prokaryote Evolution
title_full_unstemmed The Tree and Net Components of Prokaryote Evolution
title_short The Tree and Net Components of Prokaryote Evolution
title_sort tree and net components of prokaryote evolution
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2997564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20889655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evq062
work_keys_str_mv AT puigbopere thetreeandnetcomponentsofprokaryoteevolution
AT wolfyurii thetreeandnetcomponentsofprokaryoteevolution
AT koonineugenev thetreeandnetcomponentsofprokaryoteevolution
AT puigbopere treeandnetcomponentsofprokaryoteevolution
AT wolfyurii treeandnetcomponentsofprokaryoteevolution
AT koonineugenev treeandnetcomponentsofprokaryoteevolution