Cargando…

Staging Anti-Inflammatory Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease

The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is controversial because conclusions from numerous epidemiological studies reporting delayed onset of AD in NSAID users have not been corroborated in clinical trials. The purpose of this personal view is to re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lichtenstein, Mathieu P., Carriba, Paulina, Masgrau, Roser, Pujol, Aurora, Galea, Elena
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2998033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21152343
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2010.00142
_version_ 1782193342510006272
author Lichtenstein, Mathieu P.
Carriba, Paulina
Masgrau, Roser
Pujol, Aurora
Galea, Elena
author_facet Lichtenstein, Mathieu P.
Carriba, Paulina
Masgrau, Roser
Pujol, Aurora
Galea, Elena
author_sort Lichtenstein, Mathieu P.
collection PubMed
description The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is controversial because conclusions from numerous epidemiological studies reporting delayed onset of AD in NSAID users have not been corroborated in clinical trials. The purpose of this personal view is to revise the case for NSAIDs in AD therapeutics in light of: (i) the last report from the only primary prevention trial in AD, ADAPT, which, although incomplete, points to significant protection in long-term naproxen users, and (ii) the recently proposed dynamic model of AD evolution. The model contends that there is a clinical silent phase in AD that can last up to 20 years, the duration depending on life style habits, genetic factors, or cognitive reserve. The failure of many purported disease-modifying drugs in AD clinical trials is forcing the view that treatments will only be efficacious if administered pre-clinically. Here we will argue that NSAIDs failed in clinical trials because they are disease-modifying drugs, and they should be administered in early stages of the disease. A complete prevention trial in cognitively normal individuals is thus called for. Further, the shift of anti-inflammatory treatment to early stages uncovers a knowledge void about the targets of NSAIDs in asymptomatic individuals. AD researchers have mostly relied on post-mortem analysis of Aβ plaque-laden brains from demented patients or animal models, thus drawing conclusions about AD pathogenesis based on late symptoms. We will discuss evidence in support that defective, not excessive, inflammation underlies AD pathogenesis, that NSAIDs are multifunctional drugs acting on inflammatory and non-inflammatory targets, and that astrocytes and microglia may play differing roles in disease progression, with an emphasis of ApoEε4 as a key, undervalued target of NSAIDs. According to a meta-analysis of epidemiological data, NSAIDs afford an average protection of 58%. If this figure is true, and translated into patient numbers, NSAID treatment may revive as a worth pursuing strategy to significantly reduce the socio-economical burden imposed by AD.
format Text
id pubmed-2998033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29980332010-12-09 Staging Anti-Inflammatory Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease Lichtenstein, Mathieu P. Carriba, Paulina Masgrau, Roser Pujol, Aurora Galea, Elena Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is controversial because conclusions from numerous epidemiological studies reporting delayed onset of AD in NSAID users have not been corroborated in clinical trials. The purpose of this personal view is to revise the case for NSAIDs in AD therapeutics in light of: (i) the last report from the only primary prevention trial in AD, ADAPT, which, although incomplete, points to significant protection in long-term naproxen users, and (ii) the recently proposed dynamic model of AD evolution. The model contends that there is a clinical silent phase in AD that can last up to 20 years, the duration depending on life style habits, genetic factors, or cognitive reserve. The failure of many purported disease-modifying drugs in AD clinical trials is forcing the view that treatments will only be efficacious if administered pre-clinically. Here we will argue that NSAIDs failed in clinical trials because they are disease-modifying drugs, and they should be administered in early stages of the disease. A complete prevention trial in cognitively normal individuals is thus called for. Further, the shift of anti-inflammatory treatment to early stages uncovers a knowledge void about the targets of NSAIDs in asymptomatic individuals. AD researchers have mostly relied on post-mortem analysis of Aβ plaque-laden brains from demented patients or animal models, thus drawing conclusions about AD pathogenesis based on late symptoms. We will discuss evidence in support that defective, not excessive, inflammation underlies AD pathogenesis, that NSAIDs are multifunctional drugs acting on inflammatory and non-inflammatory targets, and that astrocytes and microglia may play differing roles in disease progression, with an emphasis of ApoEε4 as a key, undervalued target of NSAIDs. According to a meta-analysis of epidemiological data, NSAIDs afford an average protection of 58%. If this figure is true, and translated into patient numbers, NSAID treatment may revive as a worth pursuing strategy to significantly reduce the socio-economical burden imposed by AD. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2998033/ /pubmed/21152343 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2010.00142 Text en Copyright © 2010 Lichtenstein, Carriba, Masgrau, Pujol and Galea. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Lichtenstein, Mathieu P.
Carriba, Paulina
Masgrau, Roser
Pujol, Aurora
Galea, Elena
Staging Anti-Inflammatory Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease
title Staging Anti-Inflammatory Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease
title_full Staging Anti-Inflammatory Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease
title_fullStr Staging Anti-Inflammatory Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease
title_full_unstemmed Staging Anti-Inflammatory Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease
title_short Staging Anti-Inflammatory Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease
title_sort staging anti-inflammatory therapy in alzheimer's disease
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2998033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21152343
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2010.00142
work_keys_str_mv AT lichtensteinmathieup stagingantiinflammatorytherapyinalzheimersdisease
AT carribapaulina stagingantiinflammatorytherapyinalzheimersdisease
AT masgrauroser stagingantiinflammatorytherapyinalzheimersdisease
AT pujolaurora stagingantiinflammatorytherapyinalzheimersdisease
AT galeaelena stagingantiinflammatorytherapyinalzheimersdisease