Cargando…

Restricted Attentional Capacity within but Not between Sensory Modalities: An Individual Differences Approach

BACKGROUND: Most people show a remarkable deficit to report the second of two targets when presented in close temporal succession, reflecting an attentional blink (AB). An aspect of the AB that is often ignored is that there are large individual differences in the magnitude of the effect. Here we ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martens, Sander, Kandula, Manasa, Duncan, John
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2998418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015280
_version_ 1782193353017786368
author Martens, Sander
Kandula, Manasa
Duncan, John
author_facet Martens, Sander
Kandula, Manasa
Duncan, John
author_sort Martens, Sander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most people show a remarkable deficit to report the second of two targets when presented in close temporal succession, reflecting an attentional blink (AB). An aspect of the AB that is often ignored is that there are large individual differences in the magnitude of the effect. Here we exploit these individual differences to address a long-standing question: does attention to a visual target come at a cost for attention to an auditory target (and vice versa)? More specifically, the goal of the current study was to investigate a) whether individuals with a large within-modality AB also show a large cross-modal AB, and b) whether individual differences in AB magnitude within different modalities correlate or are completely separate. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: While minimizing differential task difficulty and chances for a task-switch to occur, a significant AB was observed when targets were both presented within the auditory or visual modality, and a positive correlation was found between individual within-modality AB magnitudes. However, neither a cross-modal AB nor a correlation between cross-modal and within-modality AB magnitudes was found. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The results provide strong evidence that a major source of attentional restriction must lie in modality-specific sensory systems rather than a central amodal system, effectively settling a long-standing debate. Individuals with a large within-modality AB may be especially committed or focused in their processing of the first target, and to some extent that tendency to focus could cross modalities, reflected in the within-modality correlation. However, what they are focusing (resource allocation, blocking of processing) is strictly within-modality as it only affects the second target on within-modality trials. The findings show that individual differences in AB magnitude can provide important information about the modular structure of human cognition.
format Text
id pubmed-2998418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29984182010-12-10 Restricted Attentional Capacity within but Not between Sensory Modalities: An Individual Differences Approach Martens, Sander Kandula, Manasa Duncan, John PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Most people show a remarkable deficit to report the second of two targets when presented in close temporal succession, reflecting an attentional blink (AB). An aspect of the AB that is often ignored is that there are large individual differences in the magnitude of the effect. Here we exploit these individual differences to address a long-standing question: does attention to a visual target come at a cost for attention to an auditory target (and vice versa)? More specifically, the goal of the current study was to investigate a) whether individuals with a large within-modality AB also show a large cross-modal AB, and b) whether individual differences in AB magnitude within different modalities correlate or are completely separate. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: While minimizing differential task difficulty and chances for a task-switch to occur, a significant AB was observed when targets were both presented within the auditory or visual modality, and a positive correlation was found between individual within-modality AB magnitudes. However, neither a cross-modal AB nor a correlation between cross-modal and within-modality AB magnitudes was found. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The results provide strong evidence that a major source of attentional restriction must lie in modality-specific sensory systems rather than a central amodal system, effectively settling a long-standing debate. Individuals with a large within-modality AB may be especially committed or focused in their processing of the first target, and to some extent that tendency to focus could cross modalities, reflected in the within-modality correlation. However, what they are focusing (resource allocation, blocking of processing) is strictly within-modality as it only affects the second target on within-modality trials. The findings show that individual differences in AB magnitude can provide important information about the modular structure of human cognition. Public Library of Science 2010-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2998418/ /pubmed/21151865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015280 Text en Martens et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Martens, Sander
Kandula, Manasa
Duncan, John
Restricted Attentional Capacity within but Not between Sensory Modalities: An Individual Differences Approach
title Restricted Attentional Capacity within but Not between Sensory Modalities: An Individual Differences Approach
title_full Restricted Attentional Capacity within but Not between Sensory Modalities: An Individual Differences Approach
title_fullStr Restricted Attentional Capacity within but Not between Sensory Modalities: An Individual Differences Approach
title_full_unstemmed Restricted Attentional Capacity within but Not between Sensory Modalities: An Individual Differences Approach
title_short Restricted Attentional Capacity within but Not between Sensory Modalities: An Individual Differences Approach
title_sort restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities: an individual differences approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2998418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015280
work_keys_str_mv AT martenssander restrictedattentionalcapacitywithinbutnotbetweensensorymodalitiesanindividualdifferencesapproach
AT kandulamanasa restrictedattentionalcapacitywithinbutnotbetweensensorymodalitiesanindividualdifferencesapproach
AT duncanjohn restrictedattentionalcapacitywithinbutnotbetweensensorymodalitiesanindividualdifferencesapproach