Cargando…

Oral complementary medicine and alternative practitioner use varies across chronic conditions and attitudes to risk

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether chronic conditions and patient factors, such as risk perception and decision-making preferences, are associated with complementary medicine and alternative practitioner use in a representative longitudinal population cohort. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Analysis of data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adams, Robert J, Appleton, Sarah L, Cole, Antonia, Gill, Tiffany K, Taylor, Anne W, Hill, Catherine L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2998815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21152252
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S12741
_version_ 1782193404838412288
author Adams, Robert J
Appleton, Sarah L
Cole, Antonia
Gill, Tiffany K
Taylor, Anne W
Hill, Catherine L
author_facet Adams, Robert J
Appleton, Sarah L
Cole, Antonia
Gill, Tiffany K
Taylor, Anne W
Hill, Catherine L
author_sort Adams, Robert J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine whether chronic conditions and patient factors, such as risk perception and decision-making preferences, are associated with complementary medicine and alternative practitioner use in a representative longitudinal population cohort. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Analysis of data from Stage 2 of the North West Adelaide Health Study of 3161 adults who attended a study clinic visit in 2004–2006. The main outcome measures were the medications brought by participants to the study clinic visit, chronic health conditions, attitudes to risk, levels of satisfaction with conventional medicine, and preferred decision-making style. RESULTS: At least one oral complementary medicine was used by 27.9% of participants, and 7.3% were visiting alternative practitioners (naturopath, osteopath). Oral complementary medicine use was significantly associated with arthritis, osteoporosis, and mental health conditions, but not with other chronic conditions. Any pattern of complementary medicine use was generally significantly associated with female gender, age at least 45 years, patient-driven decision-making preferences (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–1.77), and frequent general practitioner visits (>five per year; OR 3.62, 95% CI: 2.13–6.17). Alternative practitioner visitors were younger, with higher levels of education (diploma/trade [OR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.28–2.76], bachelor’s degree [OR 1.77, 95% CI: 1.11–2.82], income >$80,000 (OR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.26–4.11), female gender (OR 3.15, 95% CI: 2.19–4.52), joint pain not diagnosed as arthritis (OR 1.68, 95% CI: 1.17–2.41), moderate to severe depressive symptoms (OR 2.15, 95% CI: 1.04–4.46), and risk-taking behavior (3.26, 1.80–5.92), or low-to-moderate risk aversion (OR 2.08, 95% CI: 1.26–4.11). CONCLUSION: Although there is widespread use of complementary medicines in the Australian community, there are differing patterns of use between those using oral complementary medicines and those using alternative practitioners.
format Text
id pubmed-2998815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29988152010-12-09 Oral complementary medicine and alternative practitioner use varies across chronic conditions and attitudes to risk Adams, Robert J Appleton, Sarah L Cole, Antonia Gill, Tiffany K Taylor, Anne W Hill, Catherine L Clin Epidemiol Original Research OBJECTIVES: To determine whether chronic conditions and patient factors, such as risk perception and decision-making preferences, are associated with complementary medicine and alternative practitioner use in a representative longitudinal population cohort. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Analysis of data from Stage 2 of the North West Adelaide Health Study of 3161 adults who attended a study clinic visit in 2004–2006. The main outcome measures were the medications brought by participants to the study clinic visit, chronic health conditions, attitudes to risk, levels of satisfaction with conventional medicine, and preferred decision-making style. RESULTS: At least one oral complementary medicine was used by 27.9% of participants, and 7.3% were visiting alternative practitioners (naturopath, osteopath). Oral complementary medicine use was significantly associated with arthritis, osteoporosis, and mental health conditions, but not with other chronic conditions. Any pattern of complementary medicine use was generally significantly associated with female gender, age at least 45 years, patient-driven decision-making preferences (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–1.77), and frequent general practitioner visits (>five per year; OR 3.62, 95% CI: 2.13–6.17). Alternative practitioner visitors were younger, with higher levels of education (diploma/trade [OR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.28–2.76], bachelor’s degree [OR 1.77, 95% CI: 1.11–2.82], income >$80,000 (OR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.26–4.11), female gender (OR 3.15, 95% CI: 2.19–4.52), joint pain not diagnosed as arthritis (OR 1.68, 95% CI: 1.17–2.41), moderate to severe depressive symptoms (OR 2.15, 95% CI: 1.04–4.46), and risk-taking behavior (3.26, 1.80–5.92), or low-to-moderate risk aversion (OR 2.08, 95% CI: 1.26–4.11). CONCLUSION: Although there is widespread use of complementary medicines in the Australian community, there are differing patterns of use between those using oral complementary medicines and those using alternative practitioners. Dove Medical Press 2010-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2998815/ /pubmed/21152252 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S12741 Text en © 2010 Adams et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Adams, Robert J
Appleton, Sarah L
Cole, Antonia
Gill, Tiffany K
Taylor, Anne W
Hill, Catherine L
Oral complementary medicine and alternative practitioner use varies across chronic conditions and attitudes to risk
title Oral complementary medicine and alternative practitioner use varies across chronic conditions and attitudes to risk
title_full Oral complementary medicine and alternative practitioner use varies across chronic conditions and attitudes to risk
title_fullStr Oral complementary medicine and alternative practitioner use varies across chronic conditions and attitudes to risk
title_full_unstemmed Oral complementary medicine and alternative practitioner use varies across chronic conditions and attitudes to risk
title_short Oral complementary medicine and alternative practitioner use varies across chronic conditions and attitudes to risk
title_sort oral complementary medicine and alternative practitioner use varies across chronic conditions and attitudes to risk
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2998815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21152252
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S12741
work_keys_str_mv AT adamsrobertj oralcomplementarymedicineandalternativepractitionerusevariesacrosschronicconditionsandattitudestorisk
AT appletonsarahl oralcomplementarymedicineandalternativepractitionerusevariesacrosschronicconditionsandattitudestorisk
AT coleantonia oralcomplementarymedicineandalternativepractitionerusevariesacrosschronicconditionsandattitudestorisk
AT gilltiffanyk oralcomplementarymedicineandalternativepractitionerusevariesacrosschronicconditionsandattitudestorisk
AT taylorannew oralcomplementarymedicineandalternativepractitionerusevariesacrosschronicconditionsandattitudestorisk
AT hillcatherinel oralcomplementarymedicineandalternativepractitionerusevariesacrosschronicconditionsandattitudestorisk