Cargando…

Use of pathway information in molecular epidemiology

Candidate gene studies are generally motivated by some form of pathway reasoning in the selection of genes to be studied, but seldom has the logic of the approach been carried through to the analysis. Marginal effects of polymorphisms in the selected genes, and occasionally pairwise gene-gene or gen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Duncan C, Conti, David V, Baurley, James, Nijhout, Frederik, Reed, Michael, Ulrich, Cornelia M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2999471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21072972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-7364-4-1-21
_version_ 1782193439028281344
author Thomas, Duncan C
Conti, David V
Baurley, James
Nijhout, Frederik
Reed, Michael
Ulrich, Cornelia M
author_facet Thomas, Duncan C
Conti, David V
Baurley, James
Nijhout, Frederik
Reed, Michael
Ulrich, Cornelia M
author_sort Thomas, Duncan C
collection PubMed
description Candidate gene studies are generally motivated by some form of pathway reasoning in the selection of genes to be studied, but seldom has the logic of the approach been carried through to the analysis. Marginal effects of polymorphisms in the selected genes, and occasionally pairwise gene-gene or gene-environment interactions, are often presented, but a unified approach to modelling the entire pathway has been lacking. In this review, a variety of approaches to this problem is considered, focusing on hypothesis-driven rather than purely exploratory methods. Empirical modelling strategies are based on hierarchical models that allow prior knowledge about the structure of the pathway and the various reactions to be included as 'prior covariates'. By contrast, mechanistic models aim to describe the reactions through a system of differential equations with rate parameters that can vary between individuals, based on their genotypes. Some ways of combining the two approaches are suggested and Bayesian model averaging methods for dealing with uncertainty about the true model form in either framework is discussed. Biomarker measurements can be incorporated into such analyses, and two-phase sampling designs stratified on some combination of disease, genes and exposures can be an efficient way of obtaining data that would be too expensive or difficult to obtain on a full candidate gene sample. The review concludes with some thoughts about potential uses of pathways in genome-wide association studies.
format Text
id pubmed-2999471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29994712010-12-08 Use of pathway information in molecular epidemiology Thomas, Duncan C Conti, David V Baurley, James Nijhout, Frederik Reed, Michael Ulrich, Cornelia M Hum Genomics Review Candidate gene studies are generally motivated by some form of pathway reasoning in the selection of genes to be studied, but seldom has the logic of the approach been carried through to the analysis. Marginal effects of polymorphisms in the selected genes, and occasionally pairwise gene-gene or gene-environment interactions, are often presented, but a unified approach to modelling the entire pathway has been lacking. In this review, a variety of approaches to this problem is considered, focusing on hypothesis-driven rather than purely exploratory methods. Empirical modelling strategies are based on hierarchical models that allow prior knowledge about the structure of the pathway and the various reactions to be included as 'prior covariates'. By contrast, mechanistic models aim to describe the reactions through a system of differential equations with rate parameters that can vary between individuals, based on their genotypes. Some ways of combining the two approaches are suggested and Bayesian model averaging methods for dealing with uncertainty about the true model form in either framework is discussed. Biomarker measurements can be incorporated into such analyses, and two-phase sampling designs stratified on some combination of disease, genes and exposures can be an efficient way of obtaining data that would be too expensive or difficult to obtain on a full candidate gene sample. The review concludes with some thoughts about potential uses of pathways in genome-wide association studies. BioMed Central 2009-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2999471/ /pubmed/21072972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-7364-4-1-21 Text en Copyright ©2009 Henry Stewart Publications
spellingShingle Review
Thomas, Duncan C
Conti, David V
Baurley, James
Nijhout, Frederik
Reed, Michael
Ulrich, Cornelia M
Use of pathway information in molecular epidemiology
title Use of pathway information in molecular epidemiology
title_full Use of pathway information in molecular epidemiology
title_fullStr Use of pathway information in molecular epidemiology
title_full_unstemmed Use of pathway information in molecular epidemiology
title_short Use of pathway information in molecular epidemiology
title_sort use of pathway information in molecular epidemiology
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2999471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21072972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-7364-4-1-21
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasduncanc useofpathwayinformationinmolecularepidemiology
AT contidavidv useofpathwayinformationinmolecularepidemiology
AT baurleyjames useofpathwayinformationinmolecularepidemiology
AT nijhoutfrederik useofpathwayinformationinmolecularepidemiology
AT reedmichael useofpathwayinformationinmolecularepidemiology
AT ulrichcorneliam useofpathwayinformationinmolecularepidemiology