Cargando…

Validation of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of survivin as an indicator of improved prognosis in breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Conflicting data exist regarding the prognostic and predictive impact of survivin (BIRC5) in breast cancer. We previously reported survivin cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio (CNR) as an independent prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Here, we validate survivin CNR in a separate and extende...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rexhepaj, Elton, Jirstrom, Karin, O'Connor, Darran P, O'Brien, Sallyann L, Landberg, Goran, Duffy, Michael J, Brennan, Donal J, Gallagher, William M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2999619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-639
_version_ 1782193464329371648
author Rexhepaj, Elton
Jirstrom, Karin
O'Connor, Darran P
O'Brien, Sallyann L
Landberg, Goran
Duffy, Michael J
Brennan, Donal J
Gallagher, William M
author_facet Rexhepaj, Elton
Jirstrom, Karin
O'Connor, Darran P
O'Brien, Sallyann L
Landberg, Goran
Duffy, Michael J
Brennan, Donal J
Gallagher, William M
author_sort Rexhepaj, Elton
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conflicting data exist regarding the prognostic and predictive impact of survivin (BIRC5) in breast cancer. We previously reported survivin cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio (CNR) as an independent prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Here, we validate survivin CNR in a separate and extended cohort. Furthermore, we present new data suggesting that a low CNR may predict outcome in tamoxifen-treated patients. METHODS: Survin expression was assessed using immunhistochemistry on a breast cancer tissue microarray (TMA) containing 512 tumours. Whole slide digital images were captured using an Aperio XT scanner. Automated image analysis was used to identify tumour from stroma and then to quantify tumour-specific nuclear and cytoplasmic survivin. A decision tree model selected using a 10-fold cross-validation approach was used to identify prognostic subgroups based on nuclear and cytoplasmic survivin expression. RESULTS: Following optimisation of the staining procedure, it was possible to evaluate survivin protein expression in 70.1% (n = 359) of the 512 tumours represented on the TMA. Decision tree analysis predicted that nuclear, as opposed to cytoplasmic, survivin was the most important determinant of overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). The decision tree model confirmed CNR of 5 as the optimum threshold for survival analysis. Univariate analysis demonstrated an association between a high CNR (>5) and a prolonged BCSS (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.81, p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis revealed a high CNR (>5) was an independent predictor of BCSS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.82, p = 0.008). An increased CNR was associated with ER positive (p = 0.045), low grade (p = 0.007), Ki-67 (p = 0.001) and Her2 (p = 0.026) negative tumours. Finally, a high CNR was an independent predictor of OS in tamoxifen-treated ER-positive patients (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.87, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Using the same threshold as our previous study, we have validated survivin CNR as a marker of good prognosis in breast cancer in a large independent cohort. These findings provide robust evidence of the importance of survivin CNR as a breast cancer biomarker, and its potential to predict outcome in tamoxifen-treated patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2999619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29996192010-12-09 Validation of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of survivin as an indicator of improved prognosis in breast cancer Rexhepaj, Elton Jirstrom, Karin O'Connor, Darran P O'Brien, Sallyann L Landberg, Goran Duffy, Michael J Brennan, Donal J Gallagher, William M BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Conflicting data exist regarding the prognostic and predictive impact of survivin (BIRC5) in breast cancer. We previously reported survivin cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio (CNR) as an independent prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Here, we validate survivin CNR in a separate and extended cohort. Furthermore, we present new data suggesting that a low CNR may predict outcome in tamoxifen-treated patients. METHODS: Survin expression was assessed using immunhistochemistry on a breast cancer tissue microarray (TMA) containing 512 tumours. Whole slide digital images were captured using an Aperio XT scanner. Automated image analysis was used to identify tumour from stroma and then to quantify tumour-specific nuclear and cytoplasmic survivin. A decision tree model selected using a 10-fold cross-validation approach was used to identify prognostic subgroups based on nuclear and cytoplasmic survivin expression. RESULTS: Following optimisation of the staining procedure, it was possible to evaluate survivin protein expression in 70.1% (n = 359) of the 512 tumours represented on the TMA. Decision tree analysis predicted that nuclear, as opposed to cytoplasmic, survivin was the most important determinant of overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). The decision tree model confirmed CNR of 5 as the optimum threshold for survival analysis. Univariate analysis demonstrated an association between a high CNR (>5) and a prolonged BCSS (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.81, p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis revealed a high CNR (>5) was an independent predictor of BCSS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.82, p = 0.008). An increased CNR was associated with ER positive (p = 0.045), low grade (p = 0.007), Ki-67 (p = 0.001) and Her2 (p = 0.026) negative tumours. Finally, a high CNR was an independent predictor of OS in tamoxifen-treated ER-positive patients (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.87, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Using the same threshold as our previous study, we have validated survivin CNR as a marker of good prognosis in breast cancer in a large independent cohort. These findings provide robust evidence of the importance of survivin CNR as a breast cancer biomarker, and its potential to predict outcome in tamoxifen-treated patients. BioMed Central 2010-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2999619/ /pubmed/21092276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-639 Text en Copyright ©2010 Rexhepaj et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rexhepaj, Elton
Jirstrom, Karin
O'Connor, Darran P
O'Brien, Sallyann L
Landberg, Goran
Duffy, Michael J
Brennan, Donal J
Gallagher, William M
Validation of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of survivin as an indicator of improved prognosis in breast cancer
title Validation of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of survivin as an indicator of improved prognosis in breast cancer
title_full Validation of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of survivin as an indicator of improved prognosis in breast cancer
title_fullStr Validation of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of survivin as an indicator of improved prognosis in breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Validation of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of survivin as an indicator of improved prognosis in breast cancer
title_short Validation of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of survivin as an indicator of improved prognosis in breast cancer
title_sort validation of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of survivin as an indicator of improved prognosis in breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2999619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-639
work_keys_str_mv AT rexhepajelton validationofcytoplasmictonuclearratioofsurvivinasanindicatorofimprovedprognosisinbreastcancer
AT jirstromkarin validationofcytoplasmictonuclearratioofsurvivinasanindicatorofimprovedprognosisinbreastcancer
AT oconnordarranp validationofcytoplasmictonuclearratioofsurvivinasanindicatorofimprovedprognosisinbreastcancer
AT obriensallyannl validationofcytoplasmictonuclearratioofsurvivinasanindicatorofimprovedprognosisinbreastcancer
AT landberggoran validationofcytoplasmictonuclearratioofsurvivinasanindicatorofimprovedprognosisinbreastcancer
AT duffymichaelj validationofcytoplasmictonuclearratioofsurvivinasanindicatorofimprovedprognosisinbreastcancer
AT brennandonalj validationofcytoplasmictonuclearratioofsurvivinasanindicatorofimprovedprognosisinbreastcancer
AT gallagherwilliamm validationofcytoplasmictonuclearratioofsurvivinasanindicatorofimprovedprognosisinbreastcancer