Cargando…

Performances of Different Global Positioning System Devices for Time-Location Tracking in Air Pollution Epidemiological Studies

BACKGROUND: People’s time-location patterns are important in air pollution exposure assessment because pollution levels may vary considerably by location. A growing number of studies are using global positioning systems (GPS) to track people’s time-location patterns. Many portable GPS units that arc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Jun, Jiang, Chengsheng, Liu, Zhen, Houston, Douglas, Jaimes, Guillermo, McConnell, Rob
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151593
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/EHI.S6246
_version_ 1782193497450741760
author Wu, Jun
Jiang, Chengsheng
Liu, Zhen
Houston, Douglas
Jaimes, Guillermo
McConnell, Rob
author_facet Wu, Jun
Jiang, Chengsheng
Liu, Zhen
Houston, Douglas
Jaimes, Guillermo
McConnell, Rob
author_sort Wu, Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: People’s time-location patterns are important in air pollution exposure assessment because pollution levels may vary considerably by location. A growing number of studies are using global positioning systems (GPS) to track people’s time-location patterns. Many portable GPS units that archive location are commercially available at a cost that makes their use feasible for epidemiological studies. METHODS: We evaluated the performance of five portable GPS data loggers and two GPS cell phones by examining positional accuracy in typical locations (indoor, outdoor, in-vehicle) and factors that influence satellite reception (building material, building type), acquisition time (cold and warm start), battery life, and adequacy of memory for data storage. We examined stationary locations (eg, indoor, outdoor) and mobile environments (eg, walking, traveling by vehicle or bus) and compared GPS locations to highly-resolved US Geological Survey (USGS) and Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quadrangle (DOQQ) maps. RESULTS: The battery life of our tested instruments ranged from <9 hours to 48 hours. The acquisition of location time after startup ranged from a few seconds to >20 minutes and varied significantly by building structure type and by cold or warm start. No GPS device was found to have consistently superior performance with regard to spatial accuracy and signal loss. At fixed outdoor locations, 65%–95% of GPS points fell within 20-m of the corresponding DOQQ locations for all the devices. At fixed indoor locations, 50%–80% of GPS points fell within 20-m of the corresponding DOQQ locations for all the devices except one. Most of the GPS devices performed well during commuting on a freeway, with >80% of points within 10-m of the DOQQ route, but the performance was significantly impacted by surrounding structures on surface streets in highly urbanized areas. CONCLUSIONS: All the tested GPS devices had limitations, but we identified several devices which showed promising performance for tracking subjects’ time location patterns in epidemiological studies.
format Text
id pubmed-3000001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30000012010-12-13 Performances of Different Global Positioning System Devices for Time-Location Tracking in Air Pollution Epidemiological Studies Wu, Jun Jiang, Chengsheng Liu, Zhen Houston, Douglas Jaimes, Guillermo McConnell, Rob Environ Health Insights Original Research BACKGROUND: People’s time-location patterns are important in air pollution exposure assessment because pollution levels may vary considerably by location. A growing number of studies are using global positioning systems (GPS) to track people’s time-location patterns. Many portable GPS units that archive location are commercially available at a cost that makes their use feasible for epidemiological studies. METHODS: We evaluated the performance of five portable GPS data loggers and two GPS cell phones by examining positional accuracy in typical locations (indoor, outdoor, in-vehicle) and factors that influence satellite reception (building material, building type), acquisition time (cold and warm start), battery life, and adequacy of memory for data storage. We examined stationary locations (eg, indoor, outdoor) and mobile environments (eg, walking, traveling by vehicle or bus) and compared GPS locations to highly-resolved US Geological Survey (USGS) and Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quadrangle (DOQQ) maps. RESULTS: The battery life of our tested instruments ranged from <9 hours to 48 hours. The acquisition of location time after startup ranged from a few seconds to >20 minutes and varied significantly by building structure type and by cold or warm start. No GPS device was found to have consistently superior performance with regard to spatial accuracy and signal loss. At fixed outdoor locations, 65%–95% of GPS points fell within 20-m of the corresponding DOQQ locations for all the devices. At fixed indoor locations, 50%–80% of GPS points fell within 20-m of the corresponding DOQQ locations for all the devices except one. Most of the GPS devices performed well during commuting on a freeway, with >80% of points within 10-m of the DOQQ route, but the performance was significantly impacted by surrounding structures on surface streets in highly urbanized areas. CONCLUSIONS: All the tested GPS devices had limitations, but we identified several devices which showed promising performance for tracking subjects’ time location patterns in epidemiological studies. Libertas Academica 2010-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3000001/ /pubmed/21151593 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/EHI.S6246 Text en © 2010 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wu, Jun
Jiang, Chengsheng
Liu, Zhen
Houston, Douglas
Jaimes, Guillermo
McConnell, Rob
Performances of Different Global Positioning System Devices for Time-Location Tracking in Air Pollution Epidemiological Studies
title Performances of Different Global Positioning System Devices for Time-Location Tracking in Air Pollution Epidemiological Studies
title_full Performances of Different Global Positioning System Devices for Time-Location Tracking in Air Pollution Epidemiological Studies
title_fullStr Performances of Different Global Positioning System Devices for Time-Location Tracking in Air Pollution Epidemiological Studies
title_full_unstemmed Performances of Different Global Positioning System Devices for Time-Location Tracking in Air Pollution Epidemiological Studies
title_short Performances of Different Global Positioning System Devices for Time-Location Tracking in Air Pollution Epidemiological Studies
title_sort performances of different global positioning system devices for time-location tracking in air pollution epidemiological studies
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151593
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/EHI.S6246
work_keys_str_mv AT wujun performancesofdifferentglobalpositioningsystemdevicesfortimelocationtrackinginairpollutionepidemiologicalstudies
AT jiangchengsheng performancesofdifferentglobalpositioningsystemdevicesfortimelocationtrackinginairpollutionepidemiologicalstudies
AT liuzhen performancesofdifferentglobalpositioningsystemdevicesfortimelocationtrackinginairpollutionepidemiologicalstudies
AT houstondouglas performancesofdifferentglobalpositioningsystemdevicesfortimelocationtrackinginairpollutionepidemiologicalstudies
AT jaimesguillermo performancesofdifferentglobalpositioningsystemdevicesfortimelocationtrackinginairpollutionepidemiologicalstudies
AT mcconnellrob performancesofdifferentglobalpositioningsystemdevicesfortimelocationtrackinginairpollutionepidemiologicalstudies