Cargando…

Dosimetric and QA aspects of Konrad inverse planning system for commissioning intensity-modulated radiation therapy

The intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning is performed using the Konrad inverse treatment planning system and the delivery of the treatment by using Siemens Oncor Impression Plus linear accelerator (step and shoot), which has been commissioned recently. The basic beam data required f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deshpande, Shrikant, Sathiyanarayanan, V. K., Bhangle, Janhavi, Swamy, Kumara, Basu, Sumit
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21157534
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.33240
_version_ 1782193550931263488
author Deshpande, Shrikant
Sathiyanarayanan, V. K.
Bhangle, Janhavi
Swamy, Kumara
Basu, Sumit
author_facet Deshpande, Shrikant
Sathiyanarayanan, V. K.
Bhangle, Janhavi
Swamy, Kumara
Basu, Sumit
author_sort Deshpande, Shrikant
collection PubMed
description The intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning is performed using the Konrad inverse treatment planning system and the delivery of the treatment by using Siemens Oncor Impression Plus linear accelerator (step and shoot), which has been commissioned recently. The basic beam data required for commissioning the system were generate. The quality assurance of relative and absolute dose distribution was carried out before clinical implementation. The salient features of Konrad planning system, like dependence of grid size on dose volume histogram (DVH), number of intensity levels and step size in sequencer, are studied quantitatively and qualitatively. To verify whether the planned dose [from treatment planning system (TPS)] and delivered dose are the same, the absolute dose at a point is determined using CC01 ion chamber and the axial plane dose distribution is carried out using Kodak EDR2 in conjunction with OmniPro IMRT Phantom and OmniPro IMRT software from Scanditronix Wellhofer. To obtain the optimum combination in leaf sequencer module, parameters like number of intensity levels, step size are analyzed. The difference between pixel values of optimum fluence profile and the fluence profile obtained for various combinations of number of intensity levels and step size is compared and plotted. The calculations of the volume of any RT structure in the dose volume histogram are compared using grid sizes 3 mm and 4 mm. The measured and planned dose at a point showed good agreement (<3%) except for a few cases wherein the chamber was placed in a relatively high dose gradient region. The axial plane dose distribution using film dosimetry shows excellent agreement (correlation coefficient >0.97) in all the cases. In the leaf sequencer module, the combination of number of intensity level 7 with step size of 3 is the optimal solution for obtaining deliverable segments. The RT structure volume calculation is found to be more accurate with grid size of 3 mm for clinical use. Thus a study regarding various aspects of commissioning of the Konrad inverse planning system for IMRT has been presented, which has been implemented in our clinic.
format Text
id pubmed-3000530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30005302010-12-14 Dosimetric and QA aspects of Konrad inverse planning system for commissioning intensity-modulated radiation therapy Deshpande, Shrikant Sathiyanarayanan, V. K. Bhangle, Janhavi Swamy, Kumara Basu, Sumit J Med Phys Original Article The intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning is performed using the Konrad inverse treatment planning system and the delivery of the treatment by using Siemens Oncor Impression Plus linear accelerator (step and shoot), which has been commissioned recently. The basic beam data required for commissioning the system were generate. The quality assurance of relative and absolute dose distribution was carried out before clinical implementation. The salient features of Konrad planning system, like dependence of grid size on dose volume histogram (DVH), number of intensity levels and step size in sequencer, are studied quantitatively and qualitatively. To verify whether the planned dose [from treatment planning system (TPS)] and delivered dose are the same, the absolute dose at a point is determined using CC01 ion chamber and the axial plane dose distribution is carried out using Kodak EDR2 in conjunction with OmniPro IMRT Phantom and OmniPro IMRT software from Scanditronix Wellhofer. To obtain the optimum combination in leaf sequencer module, parameters like number of intensity levels, step size are analyzed. The difference between pixel values of optimum fluence profile and the fluence profile obtained for various combinations of number of intensity levels and step size is compared and plotted. The calculations of the volume of any RT structure in the dose volume histogram are compared using grid sizes 3 mm and 4 mm. The measured and planned dose at a point showed good agreement (<3%) except for a few cases wherein the chamber was placed in a relatively high dose gradient region. The axial plane dose distribution using film dosimetry shows excellent agreement (correlation coefficient >0.97) in all the cases. In the leaf sequencer module, the combination of number of intensity level 7 with step size of 3 is the optimal solution for obtaining deliverable segments. The RT structure volume calculation is found to be more accurate with grid size of 3 mm for clinical use. Thus a study regarding various aspects of commissioning of the Konrad inverse planning system for IMRT has been presented, which has been implemented in our clinic. Medknow Publications 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC3000530/ /pubmed/21157534 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.33240 Text en © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Deshpande, Shrikant
Sathiyanarayanan, V. K.
Bhangle, Janhavi
Swamy, Kumara
Basu, Sumit
Dosimetric and QA aspects of Konrad inverse planning system for commissioning intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title Dosimetric and QA aspects of Konrad inverse planning system for commissioning intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_full Dosimetric and QA aspects of Konrad inverse planning system for commissioning intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_fullStr Dosimetric and QA aspects of Konrad inverse planning system for commissioning intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric and QA aspects of Konrad inverse planning system for commissioning intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_short Dosimetric and QA aspects of Konrad inverse planning system for commissioning intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_sort dosimetric and qa aspects of konrad inverse planning system for commissioning intensity-modulated radiation therapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21157534
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.33240
work_keys_str_mv AT deshpandeshrikant dosimetricandqaaspectsofkonradinverseplanningsystemforcommissioningintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT sathiyanarayananvk dosimetricandqaaspectsofkonradinverseplanningsystemforcommissioningintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT bhanglejanhavi dosimetricandqaaspectsofkonradinverseplanningsystemforcommissioningintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT swamykumara dosimetricandqaaspectsofkonradinverseplanningsystemforcommissioningintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT basusumit dosimetricandqaaspectsofkonradinverseplanningsystemforcommissioningintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy