Cargando…

Clinical significance of cumulative biological effective dose and overall treatment time in the treatment of carcinoma cervix

The purpose of this retrospective study is to report the radiotherapy treatment response of, and complications in, patients with cervical cancer on the basis of cumulative biologic effective dose (BED) and overall treatment time (OTT). Sixty-four (stage II - 35/64; stage III - 29/64) patients of cer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mandal, Abhijit, Asthana, Anupam Kumar, Aggarwal, Lalit Mohon
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21157538
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.33244
_version_ 1782193551881273344
author Mandal, Abhijit
Asthana, Anupam Kumar
Aggarwal, Lalit Mohon
author_facet Mandal, Abhijit
Asthana, Anupam Kumar
Aggarwal, Lalit Mohon
author_sort Mandal, Abhijit
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this retrospective study is to report the radiotherapy treatment response of, and complications in, patients with cervical cancer on the basis of cumulative biologic effective dose (BED) and overall treatment time (OTT). Sixty-four (stage II - 35/64; stage III - 29/64) patients of cervical cancer were treated with combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and low dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). The cumulative BED was calculated at Point A (BED(10)); and bladder, rectal reference points (BED(2,5)) using the linear-quadratic BED equations. The local control (LC) rate and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate in patients of stage II were comparable for BED(10) <84.5 and BED(10) >84.5 but were much higher for BED(10) >84.5 than BED(10) <84.5 (P< 0.01) in stage III patients. In the stage II patients, The LC rate and 5-year DFS rate were comparable for OTT <50 days and for OTT >50 days but were much higher in stage III patients with OTT < 50 than OTT >50 days (P< 0.001). It was also observed that patients who received BED(2.5) <105 had lesser rectal (P< 0.001) and bladder complications than BED(2.5) >105. Higher rectal complication-free survival (CFS(R)) rate, bladder complication-free survival (CFS(B)) rate and all-type late complication-free survival rate were observed in patients who received BED(2.5) < 105 than BED(2.5) >105. A balanced, optimal and justified radiotherapy treatment schedule to deliver higher BED(10) (>84.5) and lower BED(2.5) (< 105) in lesser OTT (< 50 days) is essential in carcinoma cervix to expect a better treatment outcome in all respects.
format Text
id pubmed-3000534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30005342010-12-14 Clinical significance of cumulative biological effective dose and overall treatment time in the treatment of carcinoma cervix Mandal, Abhijit Asthana, Anupam Kumar Aggarwal, Lalit Mohon J Med Phys Original Article The purpose of this retrospective study is to report the radiotherapy treatment response of, and complications in, patients with cervical cancer on the basis of cumulative biologic effective dose (BED) and overall treatment time (OTT). Sixty-four (stage II - 35/64; stage III - 29/64) patients of cervical cancer were treated with combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and low dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). The cumulative BED was calculated at Point A (BED(10)); and bladder, rectal reference points (BED(2,5)) using the linear-quadratic BED equations. The local control (LC) rate and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate in patients of stage II were comparable for BED(10) <84.5 and BED(10) >84.5 but were much higher for BED(10) >84.5 than BED(10) <84.5 (P< 0.01) in stage III patients. In the stage II patients, The LC rate and 5-year DFS rate were comparable for OTT <50 days and for OTT >50 days but were much higher in stage III patients with OTT < 50 than OTT >50 days (P< 0.001). It was also observed that patients who received BED(2.5) <105 had lesser rectal (P< 0.001) and bladder complications than BED(2.5) >105. Higher rectal complication-free survival (CFS(R)) rate, bladder complication-free survival (CFS(B)) rate and all-type late complication-free survival rate were observed in patients who received BED(2.5) < 105 than BED(2.5) >105. A balanced, optimal and justified radiotherapy treatment schedule to deliver higher BED(10) (>84.5) and lower BED(2.5) (< 105) in lesser OTT (< 50 days) is essential in carcinoma cervix to expect a better treatment outcome in all respects. Medknow Publications 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC3000534/ /pubmed/21157538 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.33244 Text en © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mandal, Abhijit
Asthana, Anupam Kumar
Aggarwal, Lalit Mohon
Clinical significance of cumulative biological effective dose and overall treatment time in the treatment of carcinoma cervix
title Clinical significance of cumulative biological effective dose and overall treatment time in the treatment of carcinoma cervix
title_full Clinical significance of cumulative biological effective dose and overall treatment time in the treatment of carcinoma cervix
title_fullStr Clinical significance of cumulative biological effective dose and overall treatment time in the treatment of carcinoma cervix
title_full_unstemmed Clinical significance of cumulative biological effective dose and overall treatment time in the treatment of carcinoma cervix
title_short Clinical significance of cumulative biological effective dose and overall treatment time in the treatment of carcinoma cervix
title_sort clinical significance of cumulative biological effective dose and overall treatment time in the treatment of carcinoma cervix
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21157538
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.33244
work_keys_str_mv AT mandalabhijit clinicalsignificanceofcumulativebiologicaleffectivedoseandoveralltreatmenttimeinthetreatmentofcarcinomacervix
AT asthanaanupamkumar clinicalsignificanceofcumulativebiologicaleffectivedoseandoveralltreatmenttimeinthetreatmentofcarcinomacervix
AT aggarwallalitmohon clinicalsignificanceofcumulativebiologicaleffectivedoseandoveralltreatmenttimeinthetreatmentofcarcinomacervix