Cargando…
Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area
An intriguing region of human visual cortex (the fusiform face area; FFA) responds selectively to faces as a general higher-order stimulus category. However, the potential role of lower-order stimulus properties in FFA remains incompletely understood. To clarify those lower-level influences, we meas...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20375074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq050 |
_version_ | 1782193553318871040 |
---|---|
author | Yue, Xiaomin Cassidy, Brittany S. Devaney, Kathryn J. Holt, Daphne J. Tootell, Roger B. H. |
author_facet | Yue, Xiaomin Cassidy, Brittany S. Devaney, Kathryn J. Holt, Daphne J. Tootell, Roger B. H. |
author_sort | Yue, Xiaomin |
collection | PubMed |
description | An intriguing region of human visual cortex (the fusiform face area; FFA) responds selectively to faces as a general higher-order stimulus category. However, the potential role of lower-order stimulus properties in FFA remains incompletely understood. To clarify those lower-level influences, we measured FFA responses to independent variation in 4 lower-level stimulus dimensions using standardized face stimuli and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). These dimensions were size, position, contrast, and rotation in depth (viewpoint). We found that FFA responses were strongly influenced by variations in each of these image dimensions; that is, FFA responses were not “invariant” to any of them. Moreover, all FFA response functions were highly correlated with V1 responses (r = 0.95–0.99). As in V1, FFA responses could be accurately modeled as a combination of responses to 1) local contrast plus 2) the cortical magnification factor. In some measurements (e.g., face size or a combinations of multiple cues), the lower-level variations dominated the range of FFA responses. Manipulation of lower-level stimulus parameters could even change the category preference of FFA from “face selective” to “object selective.” Altogether, these results emphasize that a significant portion of the FFA response reflects lower-level visual responses. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3000561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30005612010-12-10 Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area Yue, Xiaomin Cassidy, Brittany S. Devaney, Kathryn J. Holt, Daphne J. Tootell, Roger B. H. Cereb Cortex Articles An intriguing region of human visual cortex (the fusiform face area; FFA) responds selectively to faces as a general higher-order stimulus category. However, the potential role of lower-order stimulus properties in FFA remains incompletely understood. To clarify those lower-level influences, we measured FFA responses to independent variation in 4 lower-level stimulus dimensions using standardized face stimuli and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). These dimensions were size, position, contrast, and rotation in depth (viewpoint). We found that FFA responses were strongly influenced by variations in each of these image dimensions; that is, FFA responses were not “invariant” to any of them. Moreover, all FFA response functions were highly correlated with V1 responses (r = 0.95–0.99). As in V1, FFA responses could be accurately modeled as a combination of responses to 1) local contrast plus 2) the cortical magnification factor. In some measurements (e.g., face size or a combinations of multiple cues), the lower-level variations dominated the range of FFA responses. Manipulation of lower-level stimulus parameters could even change the category preference of FFA from “face selective” to “object selective.” Altogether, these results emphasize that a significant portion of the FFA response reflects lower-level visual responses. Oxford University Press 2011-01 2010-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3000561/ /pubmed/20375074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq050 Text en © The Authors 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Yue, Xiaomin Cassidy, Brittany S. Devaney, Kathryn J. Holt, Daphne J. Tootell, Roger B. H. Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area |
title | Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area |
title_full | Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area |
title_fullStr | Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area |
title_full_unstemmed | Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area |
title_short | Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area |
title_sort | lower-level stimulus features strongly influence responses in the fusiform face area |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20375074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuexiaomin lowerlevelstimulusfeaturesstronglyinfluenceresponsesinthefusiformfacearea AT cassidybrittanys lowerlevelstimulusfeaturesstronglyinfluenceresponsesinthefusiformfacearea AT devaneykathrynj lowerlevelstimulusfeaturesstronglyinfluenceresponsesinthefusiformfacearea AT holtdaphnej lowerlevelstimulusfeaturesstronglyinfluenceresponsesinthefusiformfacearea AT tootellrogerbh lowerlevelstimulusfeaturesstronglyinfluenceresponsesinthefusiformfacearea |