Cargando…

Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area

An intriguing region of human visual cortex (the fusiform face area; FFA) responds selectively to faces as a general higher-order stimulus category. However, the potential role of lower-order stimulus properties in FFA remains incompletely understood. To clarify those lower-level influences, we meas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yue, Xiaomin, Cassidy, Brittany S., Devaney, Kathryn J., Holt, Daphne J., Tootell, Roger B. H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20375074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq050
_version_ 1782193553318871040
author Yue, Xiaomin
Cassidy, Brittany S.
Devaney, Kathryn J.
Holt, Daphne J.
Tootell, Roger B. H.
author_facet Yue, Xiaomin
Cassidy, Brittany S.
Devaney, Kathryn J.
Holt, Daphne J.
Tootell, Roger B. H.
author_sort Yue, Xiaomin
collection PubMed
description An intriguing region of human visual cortex (the fusiform face area; FFA) responds selectively to faces as a general higher-order stimulus category. However, the potential role of lower-order stimulus properties in FFA remains incompletely understood. To clarify those lower-level influences, we measured FFA responses to independent variation in 4 lower-level stimulus dimensions using standardized face stimuli and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). These dimensions were size, position, contrast, and rotation in depth (viewpoint). We found that FFA responses were strongly influenced by variations in each of these image dimensions; that is, FFA responses were not “invariant” to any of them. Moreover, all FFA response functions were highly correlated with V1 responses (r = 0.95–0.99). As in V1, FFA responses could be accurately modeled as a combination of responses to 1) local contrast plus 2) the cortical magnification factor. In some measurements (e.g., face size or a combinations of multiple cues), the lower-level variations dominated the range of FFA responses. Manipulation of lower-level stimulus parameters could even change the category preference of FFA from “face selective” to “object selective.” Altogether, these results emphasize that a significant portion of the FFA response reflects lower-level visual responses.
format Text
id pubmed-3000561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30005612010-12-10 Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area Yue, Xiaomin Cassidy, Brittany S. Devaney, Kathryn J. Holt, Daphne J. Tootell, Roger B. H. Cereb Cortex Articles An intriguing region of human visual cortex (the fusiform face area; FFA) responds selectively to faces as a general higher-order stimulus category. However, the potential role of lower-order stimulus properties in FFA remains incompletely understood. To clarify those lower-level influences, we measured FFA responses to independent variation in 4 lower-level stimulus dimensions using standardized face stimuli and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). These dimensions were size, position, contrast, and rotation in depth (viewpoint). We found that FFA responses were strongly influenced by variations in each of these image dimensions; that is, FFA responses were not “invariant” to any of them. Moreover, all FFA response functions were highly correlated with V1 responses (r = 0.95–0.99). As in V1, FFA responses could be accurately modeled as a combination of responses to 1) local contrast plus 2) the cortical magnification factor. In some measurements (e.g., face size or a combinations of multiple cues), the lower-level variations dominated the range of FFA responses. Manipulation of lower-level stimulus parameters could even change the category preference of FFA from “face selective” to “object selective.” Altogether, these results emphasize that a significant portion of the FFA response reflects lower-level visual responses. Oxford University Press 2011-01 2010-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3000561/ /pubmed/20375074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq050 Text en © The Authors 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Yue, Xiaomin
Cassidy, Brittany S.
Devaney, Kathryn J.
Holt, Daphne J.
Tootell, Roger B. H.
Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area
title Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area
title_full Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area
title_fullStr Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area
title_full_unstemmed Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area
title_short Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area
title_sort lower-level stimulus features strongly influence responses in the fusiform face area
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20375074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq050
work_keys_str_mv AT yuexiaomin lowerlevelstimulusfeaturesstronglyinfluenceresponsesinthefusiformfacearea
AT cassidybrittanys lowerlevelstimulusfeaturesstronglyinfluenceresponsesinthefusiformfacearea
AT devaneykathrynj lowerlevelstimulusfeaturesstronglyinfluenceresponsesinthefusiformfacearea
AT holtdaphnej lowerlevelstimulusfeaturesstronglyinfluenceresponsesinthefusiformfacearea
AT tootellrogerbh lowerlevelstimulusfeaturesstronglyinfluenceresponsesinthefusiformfacearea