Cargando…
Automatic Top-Down Processing Explains Common Left Occipito-Temporal Responses to Visual Words and Objects
Previous studies have demonstrated that a region in the left ventral occipito-temporal (LvOT) cortex is highly selective to the visual forms of written words and objects relative to closely matched visual stimuli. Here, we investigated why LvOT activation is not higher for reading than picture namin...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20413450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq063 |
_version_ | 1782193553558994944 |
---|---|
author | Kherif, Ferath Josse, Goulven Price, Cathy J. |
author_facet | Kherif, Ferath Josse, Goulven Price, Cathy J. |
author_sort | Kherif, Ferath |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous studies have demonstrated that a region in the left ventral occipito-temporal (LvOT) cortex is highly selective to the visual forms of written words and objects relative to closely matched visual stimuli. Here, we investigated why LvOT activation is not higher for reading than picture naming even though written words and pictures of objects have grossly different visual forms. To compare neuronal responses for words and pictures within the same LvOT area, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation and instructed participants to name target stimuli that followed briefly presented masked primes that were either presented in the same stimulus type as the target (word–word, picture–picture) or a different stimulus type (picture–word, word–picture). We found that activation throughout posterior and anterior parts of LvOT was reduced when the prime had the same name/response as the target irrespective of whether the prime-target relationship was within or between stimulus type. As posterior LvOT is a visual form processing area, and there was no visual form similarity between different stimulus types, we suggest that our results indicate automatic top-down influences from pictures to words and words to pictures. This novel perspective motivates further investigation of the functional properties of this intriguing region. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3000565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30005652010-12-10 Automatic Top-Down Processing Explains Common Left Occipito-Temporal Responses to Visual Words and Objects Kherif, Ferath Josse, Goulven Price, Cathy J. Cereb Cortex Articles Previous studies have demonstrated that a region in the left ventral occipito-temporal (LvOT) cortex is highly selective to the visual forms of written words and objects relative to closely matched visual stimuli. Here, we investigated why LvOT activation is not higher for reading than picture naming even though written words and pictures of objects have grossly different visual forms. To compare neuronal responses for words and pictures within the same LvOT area, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation and instructed participants to name target stimuli that followed briefly presented masked primes that were either presented in the same stimulus type as the target (word–word, picture–picture) or a different stimulus type (picture–word, word–picture). We found that activation throughout posterior and anterior parts of LvOT was reduced when the prime had the same name/response as the target irrespective of whether the prime-target relationship was within or between stimulus type. As posterior LvOT is a visual form processing area, and there was no visual form similarity between different stimulus types, we suggest that our results indicate automatic top-down influences from pictures to words and words to pictures. This novel perspective motivates further investigation of the functional properties of this intriguing region. Oxford University Press 2011-01 2010-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3000565/ /pubmed/20413450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq063 Text en © The Authors 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Kherif, Ferath Josse, Goulven Price, Cathy J. Automatic Top-Down Processing Explains Common Left Occipito-Temporal Responses to Visual Words and Objects |
title | Automatic Top-Down Processing Explains Common Left Occipito-Temporal Responses to Visual Words and Objects |
title_full | Automatic Top-Down Processing Explains Common Left Occipito-Temporal Responses to Visual Words and Objects |
title_fullStr | Automatic Top-Down Processing Explains Common Left Occipito-Temporal Responses to Visual Words and Objects |
title_full_unstemmed | Automatic Top-Down Processing Explains Common Left Occipito-Temporal Responses to Visual Words and Objects |
title_short | Automatic Top-Down Processing Explains Common Left Occipito-Temporal Responses to Visual Words and Objects |
title_sort | automatic top-down processing explains common left occipito-temporal responses to visual words and objects |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20413450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kherifferath automatictopdownprocessingexplainscommonleftoccipitotemporalresponsestovisualwordsandobjects AT jossegoulven automatictopdownprocessingexplainscommonleftoccipitotemporalresponsestovisualwordsandobjects AT pricecathyj automatictopdownprocessingexplainscommonleftoccipitotemporalresponsestovisualwordsandobjects |