Cargando…
The use of communal rearing of families and DNA pooling in aquaculture genomic selection schemes
BACKGROUND: Traditional family-based aquaculture breeding programs, in which families are kept separately until individual tagging and most traits are measured on the sibs of the candidates, are costly and require a high level of reproductive control. The most widely used alternative is a selection...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-41 |
_version_ | 1782193572156538880 |
---|---|
author | Sonesson, Anna K Meuwissen, Theo HE Goddard, Michael E |
author_facet | Sonesson, Anna K Meuwissen, Theo HE Goddard, Michael E |
author_sort | Sonesson, Anna K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Traditional family-based aquaculture breeding programs, in which families are kept separately until individual tagging and most traits are measured on the sibs of the candidates, are costly and require a high level of reproductive control. The most widely used alternative is a selection scheme, where families are reared communally and the candidates are selected based on their own individual measurements of the traits under selection. However, in the latter selection schemes, inclusion of new traits depends on the availability of non-invasive techniques to measure the traits on selection candidates. This is a severe limitation of these schemes, especially for disease resistance and fillet quality traits. METHODS: Here, we present a new selection scheme, which was validated using computer simulations comprising 100 families, among which 1, 10 or 100 were reared communally in groups. Pooling of the DNA from 2000, 20000 or 50000 test individuals with the highest and lowest phenotypes was used to estimate 500, 5000 or 10000 marker effects. One thousand or 2000 out of 20000 candidates were preselected for a growth-like trait. These pre-selected candidates were genotyped, and they were selected on their genome-wide breeding values for a trait that could not be measured on the candidates. RESULTS: A high accuracy of selection, i.e. 0.60-0.88 was obtained with 20000-50000 test individuals but it was reduced when only 2000 test individuals were used. This shows the importance of having large numbers of phenotypic records to accurately estimate marker effects. The accuracy of selection decreased with increasing numbers of families per group. CONCLUSIONS: This new selection scheme combines communal rearing of families, pre-selection of candidates, DNA pooling and genomic selection and makes multi-trait selection possible in aquaculture selection schemes without keeping families separately until individual tagging is possible. The new scheme can also be used for other farmed species, for which the cost of genotyping test individuals may be high, e.g. if trait heritability is low. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3000837 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30008372010-12-15 The use of communal rearing of families and DNA pooling in aquaculture genomic selection schemes Sonesson, Anna K Meuwissen, Theo HE Goddard, Michael E Genet Sel Evol Research BACKGROUND: Traditional family-based aquaculture breeding programs, in which families are kept separately until individual tagging and most traits are measured on the sibs of the candidates, are costly and require a high level of reproductive control. The most widely used alternative is a selection scheme, where families are reared communally and the candidates are selected based on their own individual measurements of the traits under selection. However, in the latter selection schemes, inclusion of new traits depends on the availability of non-invasive techniques to measure the traits on selection candidates. This is a severe limitation of these schemes, especially for disease resistance and fillet quality traits. METHODS: Here, we present a new selection scheme, which was validated using computer simulations comprising 100 families, among which 1, 10 or 100 were reared communally in groups. Pooling of the DNA from 2000, 20000 or 50000 test individuals with the highest and lowest phenotypes was used to estimate 500, 5000 or 10000 marker effects. One thousand or 2000 out of 20000 candidates were preselected for a growth-like trait. These pre-selected candidates were genotyped, and they were selected on their genome-wide breeding values for a trait that could not be measured on the candidates. RESULTS: A high accuracy of selection, i.e. 0.60-0.88 was obtained with 20000-50000 test individuals but it was reduced when only 2000 test individuals were used. This shows the importance of having large numbers of phenotypic records to accurately estimate marker effects. The accuracy of selection decreased with increasing numbers of families per group. CONCLUSIONS: This new selection scheme combines communal rearing of families, pre-selection of candidates, DNA pooling and genomic selection and makes multi-trait selection possible in aquaculture selection schemes without keeping families separately until individual tagging is possible. The new scheme can also be used for other farmed species, for which the cost of genotyping test individuals may be high, e.g. if trait heritability is low. BioMed Central 2010-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3000837/ /pubmed/21092198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-41 Text en Copyright ©2010 Sonesson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Sonesson, Anna K Meuwissen, Theo HE Goddard, Michael E The use of communal rearing of families and DNA pooling in aquaculture genomic selection schemes |
title | The use of communal rearing of families and DNA pooling in aquaculture genomic selection schemes |
title_full | The use of communal rearing of families and DNA pooling in aquaculture genomic selection schemes |
title_fullStr | The use of communal rearing of families and DNA pooling in aquaculture genomic selection schemes |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of communal rearing of families and DNA pooling in aquaculture genomic selection schemes |
title_short | The use of communal rearing of families and DNA pooling in aquaculture genomic selection schemes |
title_sort | use of communal rearing of families and dna pooling in aquaculture genomic selection schemes |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-41 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sonessonannak theuseofcommunalrearingoffamiliesanddnapoolinginaquaculturegenomicselectionschemes AT meuwissentheohe theuseofcommunalrearingoffamiliesanddnapoolinginaquaculturegenomicselectionschemes AT goddardmichaele theuseofcommunalrearingoffamiliesanddnapoolinginaquaculturegenomicselectionschemes AT sonessonannak useofcommunalrearingoffamiliesanddnapoolinginaquaculturegenomicselectionschemes AT meuwissentheohe useofcommunalrearingoffamiliesanddnapoolinginaquaculturegenomicselectionschemes AT goddardmichaele useofcommunalrearingoffamiliesanddnapoolinginaquaculturegenomicselectionschemes |