Cargando…

How large are the nonspecific effects of acupuncture? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: While several recent large randomized trials found clinically relevant effects of acupuncture over no treatment or routine care, blinded trials comparing acupuncture to sham interventions often reported only minor or no differences. This raises the question whether (sham) acupuncture is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linde, Klaus, Niemann, Karin, Schneider, Antonius, Meissner, Karin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-75
_version_ 1782193621826535424
author Linde, Klaus
Niemann, Karin
Schneider, Antonius
Meissner, Karin
author_facet Linde, Klaus
Niemann, Karin
Schneider, Antonius
Meissner, Karin
author_sort Linde, Klaus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While several recent large randomized trials found clinically relevant effects of acupuncture over no treatment or routine care, blinded trials comparing acupuncture to sham interventions often reported only minor or no differences. This raises the question whether (sham) acupuncture is associated with particularly potent nonspecific effects. We aimed to investigate the size of nonspecific effects associated with acupuncture interventions. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials and reference lists were searched up to April 2010 to identify randomized trials of acupuncture for any condition, including both sham and no acupuncture control groups. Data were extracted by one reviewer and verified by a second. Pooled standardized mean differences were calculated using a random effects model with the inverse variance method. RESULTS: Thirty-seven trials with a total of 5754 patients met the inclusion criteria. The included studies varied strongly regarding patients, interventions, outcome measures, methodological quality and effect sizes reported. Among the 32 trials reporting a continuous outcome measure, the random effects standardized mean difference between sham acupuncture and no acupuncture groups was -0.45 (95% confidence interval, -0.57, -0.34; I(2 )= 54%; Egger's test for funnel plot asymmetry, P = 0.25). Trials with larger effects of sham over no acupuncture reported smaller effects of acupuncture over sham intervention than trials with smaller nonspecific effects (β = -0.39, P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Sham acupuncture interventions are often associated with moderately large nonspecific effects which could make it difficult to detect small additional specific effects. Compared to inert placebo interventions, effects associated with sham acupuncture might be larger, which would have considerable implications for the design and interpretation of clinical trials.
format Text
id pubmed-3001416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30014162010-12-15 How large are the nonspecific effects of acupuncture? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Linde, Klaus Niemann, Karin Schneider, Antonius Meissner, Karin BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: While several recent large randomized trials found clinically relevant effects of acupuncture over no treatment or routine care, blinded trials comparing acupuncture to sham interventions often reported only minor or no differences. This raises the question whether (sham) acupuncture is associated with particularly potent nonspecific effects. We aimed to investigate the size of nonspecific effects associated with acupuncture interventions. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials and reference lists were searched up to April 2010 to identify randomized trials of acupuncture for any condition, including both sham and no acupuncture control groups. Data were extracted by one reviewer and verified by a second. Pooled standardized mean differences were calculated using a random effects model with the inverse variance method. RESULTS: Thirty-seven trials with a total of 5754 patients met the inclusion criteria. The included studies varied strongly regarding patients, interventions, outcome measures, methodological quality and effect sizes reported. Among the 32 trials reporting a continuous outcome measure, the random effects standardized mean difference between sham acupuncture and no acupuncture groups was -0.45 (95% confidence interval, -0.57, -0.34; I(2 )= 54%; Egger's test for funnel plot asymmetry, P = 0.25). Trials with larger effects of sham over no acupuncture reported smaller effects of acupuncture over sham intervention than trials with smaller nonspecific effects (β = -0.39, P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Sham acupuncture interventions are often associated with moderately large nonspecific effects which could make it difficult to detect small additional specific effects. Compared to inert placebo interventions, effects associated with sham acupuncture might be larger, which would have considerable implications for the design and interpretation of clinical trials. BioMed Central 2010-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3001416/ /pubmed/21092261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-75 Text en Copyright ©2010 Linde et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Linde, Klaus
Niemann, Karin
Schneider, Antonius
Meissner, Karin
How large are the nonspecific effects of acupuncture? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title How large are the nonspecific effects of acupuncture? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full How large are the nonspecific effects of acupuncture? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr How large are the nonspecific effects of acupuncture? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed How large are the nonspecific effects of acupuncture? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short How large are the nonspecific effects of acupuncture? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort how large are the nonspecific effects of acupuncture? a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-75
work_keys_str_mv AT lindeklaus howlargearethenonspecificeffectsofacupunctureametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT niemannkarin howlargearethenonspecificeffectsofacupunctureametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT schneiderantonius howlargearethenonspecificeffectsofacupunctureametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT meissnerkarin howlargearethenonspecificeffectsofacupunctureametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials