Cargando…

Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Obesity remains a major public health problem, associated with a cluster of metabolic abnormalities. However, individuals exist who are very obese but have normal metabolic parameters. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent differences in metabolic health in very obese wom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayes, Louise, Pearce, Mark S, Firbank, Michael J, Walker, Mark, Taylor, Roy, Unwin, Nigel C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21106050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-723
_version_ 1782193626558758912
author Hayes, Louise
Pearce, Mark S
Firbank, Michael J
Walker, Mark
Taylor, Roy
Unwin, Nigel C
author_facet Hayes, Louise
Pearce, Mark S
Firbank, Michael J
Walker, Mark
Taylor, Roy
Unwin, Nigel C
author_sort Hayes, Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obesity remains a major public health problem, associated with a cluster of metabolic abnormalities. However, individuals exist who are very obese but have normal metabolic parameters. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent differences in metabolic health in very obese women are explained by differences in body fat distribution, insulin resistance and level of physical activity. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional pilot study of 39 obese women (age: 28-64 yrs, BMI: 31-67 kg/m(2)) recruited from community settings. Women were defined as 'metabolically normal' on the basis of blood glucose, lipids and blood pressure. Magnetic Resonance Imaging was used to determine body fat distribution. Detailed lifestyle and metabolic profiles of participants were obtained. RESULTS: Women with a healthy metabolic profile had lower intra-abdominal fat volume (geometric mean 4.78 l [95% CIs 3.99-5.73] vs 6.96 l [5.82-8.32]) and less insulin resistance (HOMA 3.41 [2.62-4.44] vs 6.67 [5.02-8.86]) than those with an abnormality. The groups did not differ in abdominal subcutaneous fat volume (19.6 l [16.9-22.7] vs 20.6 [17.6-23.9]). A higher proportion of those with a healthy compared to a less healthy metabolic profile met current physical activity guidelines (70% [95% CIs 55.8-84.2] vs 25% [11.6-38.4]). Intra-abdominal fat, insulin resistance and physical activity make independent contributions to metabolic status in very obese women, but explain only around a third of the variance. CONCLUSION: A sub-group of women exists who are metabolically normal despite being very obese. Differences in fat distribution, insulin resistance, and physical activity level are associated with metabolic differences in these women, but account only partially for these differences. Future work should focus on strategies to identify those obese individuals most at risk of the negative metabolic consequences of obesity and on identifying other factors that contribute to metabolic status in obese individuals.
format Text
id pubmed-3001436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30014362010-12-15 Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study Hayes, Louise Pearce, Mark S Firbank, Michael J Walker, Mark Taylor, Roy Unwin, Nigel C BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Obesity remains a major public health problem, associated with a cluster of metabolic abnormalities. However, individuals exist who are very obese but have normal metabolic parameters. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent differences in metabolic health in very obese women are explained by differences in body fat distribution, insulin resistance and level of physical activity. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional pilot study of 39 obese women (age: 28-64 yrs, BMI: 31-67 kg/m(2)) recruited from community settings. Women were defined as 'metabolically normal' on the basis of blood glucose, lipids and blood pressure. Magnetic Resonance Imaging was used to determine body fat distribution. Detailed lifestyle and metabolic profiles of participants were obtained. RESULTS: Women with a healthy metabolic profile had lower intra-abdominal fat volume (geometric mean 4.78 l [95% CIs 3.99-5.73] vs 6.96 l [5.82-8.32]) and less insulin resistance (HOMA 3.41 [2.62-4.44] vs 6.67 [5.02-8.86]) than those with an abnormality. The groups did not differ in abdominal subcutaneous fat volume (19.6 l [16.9-22.7] vs 20.6 [17.6-23.9]). A higher proportion of those with a healthy compared to a less healthy metabolic profile met current physical activity guidelines (70% [95% CIs 55.8-84.2] vs 25% [11.6-38.4]). Intra-abdominal fat, insulin resistance and physical activity make independent contributions to metabolic status in very obese women, but explain only around a third of the variance. CONCLUSION: A sub-group of women exists who are metabolically normal despite being very obese. Differences in fat distribution, insulin resistance, and physical activity level are associated with metabolic differences in these women, but account only partially for these differences. Future work should focus on strategies to identify those obese individuals most at risk of the negative metabolic consequences of obesity and on identifying other factors that contribute to metabolic status in obese individuals. BioMed Central 2010-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3001436/ /pubmed/21106050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-723 Text en Copyright ©2010 Hayes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hayes, Louise
Pearce, Mark S
Firbank, Michael J
Walker, Mark
Taylor, Roy
Unwin, Nigel C
Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study
title Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study
title_full Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study
title_short Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study
title_sort do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21106050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-723
work_keys_str_mv AT hayeslouise doobesebutmetabolicallynormalwomendifferinintraabdominalfatandphysicalactivitylevelsfromthosewiththeexpectedmetabolicabnormalitiesacrosssectionalstudy
AT pearcemarks doobesebutmetabolicallynormalwomendifferinintraabdominalfatandphysicalactivitylevelsfromthosewiththeexpectedmetabolicabnormalitiesacrosssectionalstudy
AT firbankmichaelj doobesebutmetabolicallynormalwomendifferinintraabdominalfatandphysicalactivitylevelsfromthosewiththeexpectedmetabolicabnormalitiesacrosssectionalstudy
AT walkermark doobesebutmetabolicallynormalwomendifferinintraabdominalfatandphysicalactivitylevelsfromthosewiththeexpectedmetabolicabnormalitiesacrosssectionalstudy
AT taylorroy doobesebutmetabolicallynormalwomendifferinintraabdominalfatandphysicalactivitylevelsfromthosewiththeexpectedmetabolicabnormalitiesacrosssectionalstudy
AT unwinnigelc doobesebutmetabolicallynormalwomendifferinintraabdominalfatandphysicalactivitylevelsfromthosewiththeexpectedmetabolicabnormalitiesacrosssectionalstudy