Cargando…
Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Obesity remains a major public health problem, associated with a cluster of metabolic abnormalities. However, individuals exist who are very obese but have normal metabolic parameters. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent differences in metabolic health in very obese wom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21106050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-723 |
_version_ | 1782193626558758912 |
---|---|
author | Hayes, Louise Pearce, Mark S Firbank, Michael J Walker, Mark Taylor, Roy Unwin, Nigel C |
author_facet | Hayes, Louise Pearce, Mark S Firbank, Michael J Walker, Mark Taylor, Roy Unwin, Nigel C |
author_sort | Hayes, Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Obesity remains a major public health problem, associated with a cluster of metabolic abnormalities. However, individuals exist who are very obese but have normal metabolic parameters. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent differences in metabolic health in very obese women are explained by differences in body fat distribution, insulin resistance and level of physical activity. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional pilot study of 39 obese women (age: 28-64 yrs, BMI: 31-67 kg/m(2)) recruited from community settings. Women were defined as 'metabolically normal' on the basis of blood glucose, lipids and blood pressure. Magnetic Resonance Imaging was used to determine body fat distribution. Detailed lifestyle and metabolic profiles of participants were obtained. RESULTS: Women with a healthy metabolic profile had lower intra-abdominal fat volume (geometric mean 4.78 l [95% CIs 3.99-5.73] vs 6.96 l [5.82-8.32]) and less insulin resistance (HOMA 3.41 [2.62-4.44] vs 6.67 [5.02-8.86]) than those with an abnormality. The groups did not differ in abdominal subcutaneous fat volume (19.6 l [16.9-22.7] vs 20.6 [17.6-23.9]). A higher proportion of those with a healthy compared to a less healthy metabolic profile met current physical activity guidelines (70% [95% CIs 55.8-84.2] vs 25% [11.6-38.4]). Intra-abdominal fat, insulin resistance and physical activity make independent contributions to metabolic status in very obese women, but explain only around a third of the variance. CONCLUSION: A sub-group of women exists who are metabolically normal despite being very obese. Differences in fat distribution, insulin resistance, and physical activity level are associated with metabolic differences in these women, but account only partially for these differences. Future work should focus on strategies to identify those obese individuals most at risk of the negative metabolic consequences of obesity and on identifying other factors that contribute to metabolic status in obese individuals. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3001436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30014362010-12-15 Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study Hayes, Louise Pearce, Mark S Firbank, Michael J Walker, Mark Taylor, Roy Unwin, Nigel C BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Obesity remains a major public health problem, associated with a cluster of metabolic abnormalities. However, individuals exist who are very obese but have normal metabolic parameters. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent differences in metabolic health in very obese women are explained by differences in body fat distribution, insulin resistance and level of physical activity. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional pilot study of 39 obese women (age: 28-64 yrs, BMI: 31-67 kg/m(2)) recruited from community settings. Women were defined as 'metabolically normal' on the basis of blood glucose, lipids and blood pressure. Magnetic Resonance Imaging was used to determine body fat distribution. Detailed lifestyle and metabolic profiles of participants were obtained. RESULTS: Women with a healthy metabolic profile had lower intra-abdominal fat volume (geometric mean 4.78 l [95% CIs 3.99-5.73] vs 6.96 l [5.82-8.32]) and less insulin resistance (HOMA 3.41 [2.62-4.44] vs 6.67 [5.02-8.86]) than those with an abnormality. The groups did not differ in abdominal subcutaneous fat volume (19.6 l [16.9-22.7] vs 20.6 [17.6-23.9]). A higher proportion of those with a healthy compared to a less healthy metabolic profile met current physical activity guidelines (70% [95% CIs 55.8-84.2] vs 25% [11.6-38.4]). Intra-abdominal fat, insulin resistance and physical activity make independent contributions to metabolic status in very obese women, but explain only around a third of the variance. CONCLUSION: A sub-group of women exists who are metabolically normal despite being very obese. Differences in fat distribution, insulin resistance, and physical activity level are associated with metabolic differences in these women, but account only partially for these differences. Future work should focus on strategies to identify those obese individuals most at risk of the negative metabolic consequences of obesity and on identifying other factors that contribute to metabolic status in obese individuals. BioMed Central 2010-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3001436/ /pubmed/21106050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-723 Text en Copyright ©2010 Hayes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hayes, Louise Pearce, Mark S Firbank, Michael J Walker, Mark Taylor, Roy Unwin, Nigel C Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study |
title | Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study |
title_full | Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study |
title_short | Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study |
title_sort | do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21106050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-723 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hayeslouise doobesebutmetabolicallynormalwomendifferinintraabdominalfatandphysicalactivitylevelsfromthosewiththeexpectedmetabolicabnormalitiesacrosssectionalstudy AT pearcemarks doobesebutmetabolicallynormalwomendifferinintraabdominalfatandphysicalactivitylevelsfromthosewiththeexpectedmetabolicabnormalitiesacrosssectionalstudy AT firbankmichaelj doobesebutmetabolicallynormalwomendifferinintraabdominalfatandphysicalactivitylevelsfromthosewiththeexpectedmetabolicabnormalitiesacrosssectionalstudy AT walkermark doobesebutmetabolicallynormalwomendifferinintraabdominalfatandphysicalactivitylevelsfromthosewiththeexpectedmetabolicabnormalitiesacrosssectionalstudy AT taylorroy doobesebutmetabolicallynormalwomendifferinintraabdominalfatandphysicalactivitylevelsfromthosewiththeexpectedmetabolicabnormalitiesacrosssectionalstudy AT unwinnigelc doobesebutmetabolicallynormalwomendifferinintraabdominalfatandphysicalactivitylevelsfromthosewiththeexpectedmetabolicabnormalitiesacrosssectionalstudy |