Cargando…

Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a specialist team for managing refractory unipolar depressive disorder

BACKGROUND: Around 40 per cent of patients with unipolar depressive disorder who are treated in secondary care mental health services do not respond to first or second line treatments for depression. Such patients have 20 times the suicide rate of the general population and treatment response become...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morriss, Richard, Marttunnen, Sarah, Garland, Anne, Nixon, Neil, McDonald, Ruth, Sweeney, Tim, Flambert, Heather, Fox, Richard, Kaylor-Hughes, Catherine, James, Marilyn, Yang, Min
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21114826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-10-100
_version_ 1782193649884332032
author Morriss, Richard
Marttunnen, Sarah
Garland, Anne
Nixon, Neil
McDonald, Ruth
Sweeney, Tim
Flambert, Heather
Fox, Richard
Kaylor-Hughes, Catherine
James, Marilyn
Yang, Min
author_facet Morriss, Richard
Marttunnen, Sarah
Garland, Anne
Nixon, Neil
McDonald, Ruth
Sweeney, Tim
Flambert, Heather
Fox, Richard
Kaylor-Hughes, Catherine
James, Marilyn
Yang, Min
author_sort Morriss, Richard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Around 40 per cent of patients with unipolar depressive disorder who are treated in secondary care mental health services do not respond to first or second line treatments for depression. Such patients have 20 times the suicide rate of the general population and treatment response becomes harder to achieve and sustain the longer they remain depressed. Despite this there are no randomised controlled trials of community based service delivery interventions delivering both algorithm based pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for patients with chronic depressive disorder in secondary care mental health services who remain moderately or severely depressed after six months treatment. Without such trials evidence based guidelines on services for such patients cannot be derived. METHODS/DESIGN: Single blind individually randomised controlled trial of a specialist depression disorder team (psychiatrist and psychotherapist jointly assessing and providing algorithm based drug and psychological treatment) versus usual secondary care treatment. We will recruit 174 patients with unipolar depressive disorder in secondary mental health services with a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score ≥ 16 and global assessment of function (GAF) ≤ 60 after ≥ 6 months treatment. The primary outcome measures will be the HDRS and GAF supplemented by economic analysis incuding the EQ5 D and analysis of barriers to care, implementation and the process of care. Audits to benchmark both treatment arms against national standards of care will aid the interpretation of the results of the study. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first to assess the effectiveness and implementation of a community based specialist depression disorder team. The study has been specially designed as part of the CLAHRC Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and Lincolnshire joint collaboration between university, health and social care organisations to provide information of direct relevance to decisions on commissioning, service provision and implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov identifier NCT01047124
format Text
id pubmed-3001706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30017062010-12-15 Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a specialist team for managing refractory unipolar depressive disorder Morriss, Richard Marttunnen, Sarah Garland, Anne Nixon, Neil McDonald, Ruth Sweeney, Tim Flambert, Heather Fox, Richard Kaylor-Hughes, Catherine James, Marilyn Yang, Min BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Around 40 per cent of patients with unipolar depressive disorder who are treated in secondary care mental health services do not respond to first or second line treatments for depression. Such patients have 20 times the suicide rate of the general population and treatment response becomes harder to achieve and sustain the longer they remain depressed. Despite this there are no randomised controlled trials of community based service delivery interventions delivering both algorithm based pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for patients with chronic depressive disorder in secondary care mental health services who remain moderately or severely depressed after six months treatment. Without such trials evidence based guidelines on services for such patients cannot be derived. METHODS/DESIGN: Single blind individually randomised controlled trial of a specialist depression disorder team (psychiatrist and psychotherapist jointly assessing and providing algorithm based drug and psychological treatment) versus usual secondary care treatment. We will recruit 174 patients with unipolar depressive disorder in secondary mental health services with a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score ≥ 16 and global assessment of function (GAF) ≤ 60 after ≥ 6 months treatment. The primary outcome measures will be the HDRS and GAF supplemented by economic analysis incuding the EQ5 D and analysis of barriers to care, implementation and the process of care. Audits to benchmark both treatment arms against national standards of care will aid the interpretation of the results of the study. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first to assess the effectiveness and implementation of a community based specialist depression disorder team. The study has been specially designed as part of the CLAHRC Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and Lincolnshire joint collaboration between university, health and social care organisations to provide information of direct relevance to decisions on commissioning, service provision and implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov identifier NCT01047124 BioMed Central 2010-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3001706/ /pubmed/21114826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-10-100 Text en Copyright ©2010 Morriss et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Morriss, Richard
Marttunnen, Sarah
Garland, Anne
Nixon, Neil
McDonald, Ruth
Sweeney, Tim
Flambert, Heather
Fox, Richard
Kaylor-Hughes, Catherine
James, Marilyn
Yang, Min
Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a specialist team for managing refractory unipolar depressive disorder
title Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a specialist team for managing refractory unipolar depressive disorder
title_full Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a specialist team for managing refractory unipolar depressive disorder
title_fullStr Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a specialist team for managing refractory unipolar depressive disorder
title_full_unstemmed Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a specialist team for managing refractory unipolar depressive disorder
title_short Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a specialist team for managing refractory unipolar depressive disorder
title_sort randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a specialist team for managing refractory unipolar depressive disorder
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21114826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-10-100
work_keys_str_mv AT morrissrichard randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofaspecialistteamformanagingrefractoryunipolardepressivedisorder
AT marttunnensarah randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofaspecialistteamformanagingrefractoryunipolardepressivedisorder
AT garlandanne randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofaspecialistteamformanagingrefractoryunipolardepressivedisorder
AT nixonneil randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofaspecialistteamformanagingrefractoryunipolardepressivedisorder
AT mcdonaldruth randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofaspecialistteamformanagingrefractoryunipolardepressivedisorder
AT sweeneytim randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofaspecialistteamformanagingrefractoryunipolardepressivedisorder
AT flambertheather randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofaspecialistteamformanagingrefractoryunipolardepressivedisorder
AT foxrichard randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofaspecialistteamformanagingrefractoryunipolardepressivedisorder
AT kaylorhughescatherine randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofaspecialistteamformanagingrefractoryunipolardepressivedisorder
AT jamesmarilyn randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofaspecialistteamformanagingrefractoryunipolardepressivedisorder
AT yangmin randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofaspecialistteamformanagingrefractoryunipolardepressivedisorder