Cargando…

Long descending cervical propriospinal neurons differ from thoracic propriospinal neurons in response to low thoracic spinal injury

BACKGROUND: Propriospinal neurons, with axonal projections intrinsic to the spinal cord, have shown a greater regenerative response than supraspinal neurons after axotomy due to spinal cord injury (SCI). Our previous work focused on the response of axotomized short thoracic propriospinal (TPS) neuro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siebert, Justin R, Middleton, Frank A, Stelzner, Dennis J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-11-148
_version_ 1782193658506772480
author Siebert, Justin R
Middleton, Frank A
Stelzner, Dennis J
author_facet Siebert, Justin R
Middleton, Frank A
Stelzner, Dennis J
author_sort Siebert, Justin R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Propriospinal neurons, with axonal projections intrinsic to the spinal cord, have shown a greater regenerative response than supraspinal neurons after axotomy due to spinal cord injury (SCI). Our previous work focused on the response of axotomized short thoracic propriospinal (TPS) neurons following a low thoracic SCI (T9 spinal transection or moderate spinal contusion injury) in the rat. The present investigation analyzes the intrinsic response of cervical propriospinal neurons having long descending axons which project into the lumbosacral enlargement, long descending propriospinal tract (LDPT) axons. These neurons also were axotomized by T9 spinal injury in the same animals used in our previous study. RESULTS: Utilizing laser microdissection (LMD), qRT-PCR, and immunohistochemistry, we studied LDPT neurons (located in the C5-C6 spinal segments) between 3-days, and 1-month following a low thoracic (T9) spinal cord injury. We examined the response of 89 genes related to growth factors, cell surface receptors, apoptosis, axonal regeneration, and neuroprotection/cell survival. We found a strong and significant down-regulation of ~25% of the genes analyzed early after injury (3-days post-injury) with a sustained down-regulation in most instances. In the few genes that were up-regulated (Actb, Atf3, Frs2, Hspb1, Nrap, Stat1) post-axotomy, the expression for all but one was down-regulated by 2-weeks post-injury. We also compared the uninjured TPS control neurons to the uninjured LDPT neurons used in this experiment for phenotypic differences between these two subpopulations of propriospinal neurons. We found significant differences in expression in 37 of the 84 genes examined between these two subpopulations of propriospinal neurons with LDPT neurons exhibiting a significantly higher base line expression for all but 3 of these genes compared to TPS neurons. CONCLUSIONS: Taken collectively these data indicate a broad overall down-regulation in the genes examined, including genes for neurotrophic/growth factor receptors as well as for several growth factors. There was a lack of a significant regenerative response, with the exception of an up-regulation of Atf3 and early up-regulation of Hspb1 (Hsp27), both involved in cell stress/neuroprotection as well as axonal regeneration. There was no indication of a cell death response over the first month post-injury. In addition, there appear to be significant phenotypic differences between uninjured TPS and LDPT neurons, which may partly account for the differences observed in their post-axotomy responses. The findings in this current study stand in stark contrast to the findings from our previous work on TPS neurons. This suggests that different approaches will be needed to enhance the capacity for each population of propriospinal neuron to survive and undergo successful axonal regeneration after SCI.
format Text
id pubmed-3001741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30017412010-12-15 Long descending cervical propriospinal neurons differ from thoracic propriospinal neurons in response to low thoracic spinal injury Siebert, Justin R Middleton, Frank A Stelzner, Dennis J BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Propriospinal neurons, with axonal projections intrinsic to the spinal cord, have shown a greater regenerative response than supraspinal neurons after axotomy due to spinal cord injury (SCI). Our previous work focused on the response of axotomized short thoracic propriospinal (TPS) neurons following a low thoracic SCI (T9 spinal transection or moderate spinal contusion injury) in the rat. The present investigation analyzes the intrinsic response of cervical propriospinal neurons having long descending axons which project into the lumbosacral enlargement, long descending propriospinal tract (LDPT) axons. These neurons also were axotomized by T9 spinal injury in the same animals used in our previous study. RESULTS: Utilizing laser microdissection (LMD), qRT-PCR, and immunohistochemistry, we studied LDPT neurons (located in the C5-C6 spinal segments) between 3-days, and 1-month following a low thoracic (T9) spinal cord injury. We examined the response of 89 genes related to growth factors, cell surface receptors, apoptosis, axonal regeneration, and neuroprotection/cell survival. We found a strong and significant down-regulation of ~25% of the genes analyzed early after injury (3-days post-injury) with a sustained down-regulation in most instances. In the few genes that were up-regulated (Actb, Atf3, Frs2, Hspb1, Nrap, Stat1) post-axotomy, the expression for all but one was down-regulated by 2-weeks post-injury. We also compared the uninjured TPS control neurons to the uninjured LDPT neurons used in this experiment for phenotypic differences between these two subpopulations of propriospinal neurons. We found significant differences in expression in 37 of the 84 genes examined between these two subpopulations of propriospinal neurons with LDPT neurons exhibiting a significantly higher base line expression for all but 3 of these genes compared to TPS neurons. CONCLUSIONS: Taken collectively these data indicate a broad overall down-regulation in the genes examined, including genes for neurotrophic/growth factor receptors as well as for several growth factors. There was a lack of a significant regenerative response, with the exception of an up-regulation of Atf3 and early up-regulation of Hspb1 (Hsp27), both involved in cell stress/neuroprotection as well as axonal regeneration. There was no indication of a cell death response over the first month post-injury. In addition, there appear to be significant phenotypic differences between uninjured TPS and LDPT neurons, which may partly account for the differences observed in their post-axotomy responses. The findings in this current study stand in stark contrast to the findings from our previous work on TPS neurons. This suggests that different approaches will be needed to enhance the capacity for each population of propriospinal neuron to survive and undergo successful axonal regeneration after SCI. BioMed Central 2010-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3001741/ /pubmed/21092315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-11-148 Text en Copyright ©2010 Siebert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Siebert, Justin R
Middleton, Frank A
Stelzner, Dennis J
Long descending cervical propriospinal neurons differ from thoracic propriospinal neurons in response to low thoracic spinal injury
title Long descending cervical propriospinal neurons differ from thoracic propriospinal neurons in response to low thoracic spinal injury
title_full Long descending cervical propriospinal neurons differ from thoracic propriospinal neurons in response to low thoracic spinal injury
title_fullStr Long descending cervical propriospinal neurons differ from thoracic propriospinal neurons in response to low thoracic spinal injury
title_full_unstemmed Long descending cervical propriospinal neurons differ from thoracic propriospinal neurons in response to low thoracic spinal injury
title_short Long descending cervical propriospinal neurons differ from thoracic propriospinal neurons in response to low thoracic spinal injury
title_sort long descending cervical propriospinal neurons differ from thoracic propriospinal neurons in response to low thoracic spinal injury
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-11-148
work_keys_str_mv AT siebertjustinr longdescendingcervicalpropriospinalneuronsdifferfromthoracicpropriospinalneuronsinresponsetolowthoracicspinalinjury
AT middletonfranka longdescendingcervicalpropriospinalneuronsdifferfromthoracicpropriospinalneuronsinresponsetolowthoracicspinalinjury
AT stelznerdennisj longdescendingcervicalpropriospinalneuronsdifferfromthoracicpropriospinalneuronsinresponsetolowthoracicspinalinjury