Cargando…
Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
BACKGROUND: Dose-dense chemotherapy has become a mainstay regimen in the adjuvant setting for women with high-risk breast cancer. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing data from randomized controlled trials regarding the efficacy and toxicity of the dose-dense chemothera...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21098761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq409 |
_version_ | 1782193675831345152 |
---|---|
author | Bonilla, Luisa Ben-Aharon, Irit Vidal, Liat Gafter-Gvili, Anat Leibovici, Leonard Stemmer, Salomon M. |
author_facet | Bonilla, Luisa Ben-Aharon, Irit Vidal, Liat Gafter-Gvili, Anat Leibovici, Leonard Stemmer, Salomon M. |
author_sort | Bonilla, Luisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dose-dense chemotherapy has become a mainstay regimen in the adjuvant setting for women with high-risk breast cancer. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing data from randomized controlled trials regarding the efficacy and toxicity of the dose-dense chemotherapy approach in nonmetastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials that compared a dose-dense chemotherapy protocol with a standard chemotherapy schedule in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting in adult women older than 18 years with breast cancer were identified by searching The Cochrane Cancer Network register of trials, The Cochrane Library, and LILACS and MEDLINE databases (from January 1966 to January 2010). Hazard ratios (HRs) of death and recurrence and relative risks of adverse events were estimated and pooled. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Ten trials met the inclusion criteria and were classified into two categories based on trial methodology. Three trials enrolling 3337 patients compared dose-dense chemotherapy with a conventional chemotherapy schedule (similar agents). Patients who received dose-dense chemotherapy had better overall survival (HR of death = 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.72 to 0.98, P = .03) and better disease-free survival (HR of recurrence or death = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.94, P = .005) than those on the conventional schedule. No benefit was observed in patients with hormone receptor–positive tumors. Seven trials enrolling 8652 patients compared dose-dense chemotherapy with regimens that use standard intervals but with different agents and/or dosages in the treatment arms. Similar results were obtained for these trials with respect to overall survival (HR of death = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.96, P = .01) and disease-free survival (HR of recurrence or death = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.88, P < .001). The rate of nonhematological adverse events was higher in the dose-dense chemotherapy arms than in the conventional chemotherapy arms. CONCLUSION: Dose-dense chemotherapy results in better overall and disease-free survival, particularly in women with hormone receptor–negative breast cancer. However, additional data from randomized controlled trials are needed before dose-dense chemotherapy can be considered as the standard of care. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3001963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30019632010-12-15 Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Bonilla, Luisa Ben-Aharon, Irit Vidal, Liat Gafter-Gvili, Anat Leibovici, Leonard Stemmer, Salomon M. J Natl Cancer Inst Articles BACKGROUND: Dose-dense chemotherapy has become a mainstay regimen in the adjuvant setting for women with high-risk breast cancer. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing data from randomized controlled trials regarding the efficacy and toxicity of the dose-dense chemotherapy approach in nonmetastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials that compared a dose-dense chemotherapy protocol with a standard chemotherapy schedule in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting in adult women older than 18 years with breast cancer were identified by searching The Cochrane Cancer Network register of trials, The Cochrane Library, and LILACS and MEDLINE databases (from January 1966 to January 2010). Hazard ratios (HRs) of death and recurrence and relative risks of adverse events were estimated and pooled. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Ten trials met the inclusion criteria and were classified into two categories based on trial methodology. Three trials enrolling 3337 patients compared dose-dense chemotherapy with a conventional chemotherapy schedule (similar agents). Patients who received dose-dense chemotherapy had better overall survival (HR of death = 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.72 to 0.98, P = .03) and better disease-free survival (HR of recurrence or death = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.94, P = .005) than those on the conventional schedule. No benefit was observed in patients with hormone receptor–positive tumors. Seven trials enrolling 8652 patients compared dose-dense chemotherapy with regimens that use standard intervals but with different agents and/or dosages in the treatment arms. Similar results were obtained for these trials with respect to overall survival (HR of death = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.96, P = .01) and disease-free survival (HR of recurrence or death = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.88, P < .001). The rate of nonhematological adverse events was higher in the dose-dense chemotherapy arms than in the conventional chemotherapy arms. CONCLUSION: Dose-dense chemotherapy results in better overall and disease-free survival, particularly in women with hormone receptor–negative breast cancer. However, additional data from randomized controlled trials are needed before dose-dense chemotherapy can be considered as the standard of care. Oxford University Press 2010-12-15 2010-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3001963/ /pubmed/21098761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq409 Text en © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Bonilla, Luisa Ben-Aharon, Irit Vidal, Liat Gafter-Gvili, Anat Leibovici, Leonard Stemmer, Salomon M. Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | dose-dense chemotherapy in nonmetastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21098761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bonillaluisa dosedensechemotherapyinnonmetastaticbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT benaharonirit dosedensechemotherapyinnonmetastaticbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT vidalliat dosedensechemotherapyinnonmetastaticbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT gaftergvilianat dosedensechemotherapyinnonmetastaticbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT leibovicileonard dosedensechemotherapyinnonmetastaticbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT stemmersalomonm dosedensechemotherapyinnonmetastaticbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |