Cargando…

Minimal invasive single-site surgery in colorectal procedures: Current state of the art

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive single-site (MISS) surgery has recently been applied to colorectal surgery. We aimed to assess the current state of the art and the adequacy of preliminary oncological results. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature using Pubmed, Medline, SCOPUS an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diana, Michele, Dhumane, Parag, Cahill, R A, Mortensen, N, Leroy, Joel, Marescaux, Jacques
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3002007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21197243
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.72382
_version_ 1782193681577541632
author Diana, Michele
Dhumane, Parag
Cahill, R A
Mortensen, N
Leroy, Joel
Marescaux, Jacques
author_facet Diana, Michele
Dhumane, Parag
Cahill, R A
Mortensen, N
Leroy, Joel
Marescaux, Jacques
author_sort Diana, Michele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive single-site (MISS) surgery has recently been applied to colorectal surgery. We aimed to assess the current state of the art and the adequacy of preliminary oncological results. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature using Pubmed, Medline, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases. Keywords used were “Single Port” or “Single-Incision” or “LaparoEndoscopic Single Site” or “SILS™” and “Colon” or “Colorectal” and “Surgery”. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles on colorectal MISS surgery have been published from July 2008 to July 2010, presenting data on 149 patients. One study reported analgesic requirement. The final incision length ranged from 2.5 to 8 cm. Only two studies reported fascial incision length. There were two port site hernias in a series of 13 patients (15.38%). Two “fully laparoscopic” MISS procedures with preparation and achievement of the anastomosis completely intracorporeally are reported. Future site of ileostomy was used as the sole access for the procedures in three studies. Lymph node harvesting, resection margins and length of specimen were sufficient in oncological cases. CONCLUSIONS: MISS colorectal surgery is a challenging procedure that seems to be safe and feasible, but the existing clinical evidence is limited. In selected cases, and especially when an ileostomy is planned, colorectal surgery may be an ideal indication for MISS surgery leading to a no-scar surgery. Despite preliminary oncological results showing the feasibility of MISS surgery, we want to stress the need to standardize the technique and carefully evaluate its application in oncosurgery under ethical committee control.
format Text
id pubmed-3002007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30020072011-01-01 Minimal invasive single-site surgery in colorectal procedures: Current state of the art Diana, Michele Dhumane, Parag Cahill, R A Mortensen, N Leroy, Joel Marescaux, Jacques J Minim Access Surg GI Surgery BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive single-site (MISS) surgery has recently been applied to colorectal surgery. We aimed to assess the current state of the art and the adequacy of preliminary oncological results. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature using Pubmed, Medline, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases. Keywords used were “Single Port” or “Single-Incision” or “LaparoEndoscopic Single Site” or “SILS™” and “Colon” or “Colorectal” and “Surgery”. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles on colorectal MISS surgery have been published from July 2008 to July 2010, presenting data on 149 patients. One study reported analgesic requirement. The final incision length ranged from 2.5 to 8 cm. Only two studies reported fascial incision length. There were two port site hernias in a series of 13 patients (15.38%). Two “fully laparoscopic” MISS procedures with preparation and achievement of the anastomosis completely intracorporeally are reported. Future site of ileostomy was used as the sole access for the procedures in three studies. Lymph node harvesting, resection margins and length of specimen were sufficient in oncological cases. CONCLUSIONS: MISS colorectal surgery is a challenging procedure that seems to be safe and feasible, but the existing clinical evidence is limited. In selected cases, and especially when an ileostomy is planned, colorectal surgery may be an ideal indication for MISS surgery leading to a no-scar surgery. Despite preliminary oncological results showing the feasibility of MISS surgery, we want to stress the need to standardize the technique and carefully evaluate its application in oncosurgery under ethical committee control. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3002007/ /pubmed/21197243 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.72382 Text en © Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle GI Surgery
Diana, Michele
Dhumane, Parag
Cahill, R A
Mortensen, N
Leroy, Joel
Marescaux, Jacques
Minimal invasive single-site surgery in colorectal procedures: Current state of the art
title Minimal invasive single-site surgery in colorectal procedures: Current state of the art
title_full Minimal invasive single-site surgery in colorectal procedures: Current state of the art
title_fullStr Minimal invasive single-site surgery in colorectal procedures: Current state of the art
title_full_unstemmed Minimal invasive single-site surgery in colorectal procedures: Current state of the art
title_short Minimal invasive single-site surgery in colorectal procedures: Current state of the art
title_sort minimal invasive single-site surgery in colorectal procedures: current state of the art
topic GI Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3002007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21197243
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.72382
work_keys_str_mv AT dianamichele minimalinvasivesinglesitesurgeryincolorectalprocedurescurrentstateoftheart
AT dhumaneparag minimalinvasivesinglesitesurgeryincolorectalprocedurescurrentstateoftheart
AT cahillra minimalinvasivesinglesitesurgeryincolorectalprocedurescurrentstateoftheart
AT mortensenn minimalinvasivesinglesitesurgeryincolorectalprocedurescurrentstateoftheart
AT leroyjoel minimalinvasivesinglesitesurgeryincolorectalprocedurescurrentstateoftheart
AT marescauxjacques minimalinvasivesinglesitesurgeryincolorectalprocedurescurrentstateoftheart