Cargando…

Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen prognostic value in serum and tumour tissue of patients with colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the serum and the tumour tissue of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is the most commonly used tumour marker for the diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis or recurrence after treatment, but the role remains controversial. The objective of this study was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, M, Li, J-Y, Zhao, A-L, He, J-S, Zhou, L-X, Li, Y-A, Gu, J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3002045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18513194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01591.x
_version_ 1782193692228976640
author Li, M
Li, J-Y
Zhao, A-L
He, J-S
Zhou, L-X
Li, Y-A
Gu, J
author_facet Li, M
Li, J-Y
Zhao, A-L
He, J-S
Zhou, L-X
Li, Y-A
Gu, J
author_sort Li, M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the serum and the tumour tissue of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is the most commonly used tumour marker for the diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis or recurrence after treatment, but the role remains controversial. The objective of this study was to compare the prognostic value of CEA both in serum and tumour tissue in CRC. METHOD: A total of 173 patients with CRC in stages I–III were retrospectively assessed with the endpoint of recurrence or metastasis after curative operation. CEA was assessed both in serum and tumour tissue. RESULTS: 37.0% (64/173) patients had a high level of CEA in serum (S-CEA) while 39.3% (68/173) had high CEA in tumour tissue (T-CEA). There were no significant differences in clinico-pathological features between the low and high S-CEA or T-CEA groups. The high S-CEA group had a worse prognosis than the low S-CEA group but the difference was not significant. The high T-CEA group had a significantly poorer prognosis than the low T-CEA group (P=0.028) in the univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the T-CEA was an independent prognosis factor in CRC. Because many factors would affect the concentration of S-CEA, there was no correlation between S-CEA and T-CEA directly. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that a high T-CEA concentration may be a useful and independent predictor for poor outcome after surgery in CRC patients. It may be stronger than a high preoperative serum CEA level.
format Text
id pubmed-3002045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30020452010-12-31 Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen prognostic value in serum and tumour tissue of patients with colorectal cancer Li, M Li, J-Y Zhao, A-L He, J-S Zhou, L-X Li, Y-A Gu, J Colorectal Dis Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the serum and the tumour tissue of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is the most commonly used tumour marker for the diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis or recurrence after treatment, but the role remains controversial. The objective of this study was to compare the prognostic value of CEA both in serum and tumour tissue in CRC. METHOD: A total of 173 patients with CRC in stages I–III were retrospectively assessed with the endpoint of recurrence or metastasis after curative operation. CEA was assessed both in serum and tumour tissue. RESULTS: 37.0% (64/173) patients had a high level of CEA in serum (S-CEA) while 39.3% (68/173) had high CEA in tumour tissue (T-CEA). There were no significant differences in clinico-pathological features between the low and high S-CEA or T-CEA groups. The high S-CEA group had a worse prognosis than the low S-CEA group but the difference was not significant. The high T-CEA group had a significantly poorer prognosis than the low T-CEA group (P=0.028) in the univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the T-CEA was an independent prognosis factor in CRC. Because many factors would affect the concentration of S-CEA, there was no correlation between S-CEA and T-CEA directly. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that a high T-CEA concentration may be a useful and independent predictor for poor outcome after surgery in CRC patients. It may be stronger than a high preoperative serum CEA level. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3002045/ /pubmed/18513194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01591.x Text en Journal compilation © 2009 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Li, M
Li, J-Y
Zhao, A-L
He, J-S
Zhou, L-X
Li, Y-A
Gu, J
Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen prognostic value in serum and tumour tissue of patients with colorectal cancer
title Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen prognostic value in serum and tumour tissue of patients with colorectal cancer
title_full Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen prognostic value in serum and tumour tissue of patients with colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen prognostic value in serum and tumour tissue of patients with colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen prognostic value in serum and tumour tissue of patients with colorectal cancer
title_short Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen prognostic value in serum and tumour tissue of patients with colorectal cancer
title_sort comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen prognostic value in serum and tumour tissue of patients with colorectal cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3002045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18513194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01591.x
work_keys_str_mv AT lim comparisonofcarcinoembryonicantigenprognosticvalueinserumandtumourtissueofpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT lijy comparisonofcarcinoembryonicantigenprognosticvalueinserumandtumourtissueofpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT zhaoal comparisonofcarcinoembryonicantigenprognosticvalueinserumandtumourtissueofpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT hejs comparisonofcarcinoembryonicantigenprognosticvalueinserumandtumourtissueofpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT zhoulx comparisonofcarcinoembryonicantigenprognosticvalueinserumandtumourtissueofpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT liya comparisonofcarcinoembryonicantigenprognosticvalueinserumandtumourtissueofpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT guj comparisonofcarcinoembryonicantigenprognosticvalueinserumandtumourtissueofpatientswithcolorectalcancer