Cargando…

In-Home Coal and Wood Use and Lung Cancer Risk: A Pooled Analysis of the International Lung Cancer Consortium

BACKGROUND: Domestic fuel combustion from cooking and heating is an important public health issue because roughly 3 billion people are exposed worldwide. Recently, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified indoor emissions from household coal combustion as a human carcinogen (group...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosgood, H. Dean, Boffetta, Paolo, Greenland, Sander, Lee, Yuan-Chin Amy, McLaughlin, John, Seow, Adeline, Duell, Eric J., Andrew, Angeline S., Zaridze, David, Szeszenia-Dabrowska, Neonila, Rudnai, Peter, Lissowska, Jolanta, Fabiánová, Eleonóra, Mates, Dana, Bencko, Vladimir, Foretova, Lenka, Janout, Vladimir, Morgenstern, Hal, Rothman, Nathaniel, Hung, Rayjean J., Brennan, Paul, Lan, Qing
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3002194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20846923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002217
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Domestic fuel combustion from cooking and heating is an important public health issue because roughly 3 billion people are exposed worldwide. Recently, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified indoor emissions from household coal combustion as a human carcinogen (group 1) and from biomass fuel (primarily wood) as a probable human carcinogen (group 2A). OBJECTIVES: We pooled seven studies from the International Lung Cancer Consortium (5,105 cases and 6,535 controls) to provide further epidemiological evaluation of the association between in-home solid-fuel use, particularly wood, and lung cancer risk. METHODS: Using questionnaire data, we classified subjects as predominant solid-fuel users (e.g., coal, wood) or nonsolid-fuel users (e.g., oil, gas, electricity). Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and to compute 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for age, sex, education, smoking status, race/ethnicity, and study center. RESULTS: Compared with nonsolid-fuel users, predominant coal users (OR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.49–1.81), particularly coal users in Asia (OR = 4.93; 95% CI, 3.73–6.52), and predominant wood users in North American and European countries (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06–1.38) experienced higher risk of lung cancer. The results were similar in never-smoking women and other subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with previous observations pertaining to in-home coal use and lung cancer risk, support the hypothesis of a carcinogenic potential of in-home wood use, and point to the need for more detailed study of factors affecting these associations.