Cargando…

Automated Digital Image Analysis (TrichoScan®) for Human Hair Growth Analysis: Ease versus Errors

BACKGROUND: TrichoScan(®) is considered to be time-saving, easy to perform and consistent for quantifying hair loss/growth. Conflicting results of our study lead us to closely observe the image analysis, and certain repeated errors in the detection of hair were highlighted. AIMS: To assess the utili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saraogi, Punit P, Dhurat, Rachita S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3002414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21188016
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7753.66905
_version_ 1782193753322160128
author Saraogi, Punit P
Dhurat, Rachita S
author_facet Saraogi, Punit P
Dhurat, Rachita S
author_sort Saraogi, Punit P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: TrichoScan(®) is considered to be time-saving, easy to perform and consistent for quantifying hair loss/growth. Conflicting results of our study lead us to closely observe the image analysis, and certain repeated errors in the detection of hair were highlighted. AIMS: To assess the utility of TrichoScan in quantification of diffuse hair loss in males with androgenetic alopecia (AGA) and females with diffuse telogen hair loss, with regard to total hair density (THD), telogen and vellus hair percentages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TrichoScan procedure was performed on 77 cases and 20 controls. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In the cases, THD decreased with increasing severity of alopecia. Surprisingly, more than 85% of the healthy volunteers had an unexplained abnormal telogen hair percentage of more than 20. Also, the telogen hair percentages were not significantly different between cases and controls. Also, 65% of the patients with advanced thinning of hair did not have the expected elevation of vellus hair percentages on TrichoScan evaluation. Multiple errors were highlighted in hair detection by the software. Errors were noted at the exit points of follicular ostia, at places where hair strand thickness was not uniform throughout its length, where there was crossing, overlapping of the neighboring strands, and when more than one hair emerged from a single ostium. CONCLUSION: TrichoScan is promoted as a validated and precise tool for measurement of hair growth parameters. Under certain conditions, it may seem suitable for clinical trials evaluating treatment response. We provide evidence that this is an overstatement. This study concludes that TrichoScan-analyzed anagen/telogen hair detection is not optimal; moreover, there is overestimation of THD and the vellus hair percentage does not correlate with clinical severity of alopecia. The current form of TrichoScan, though easy to use, is error-prone and awaits refinement.
format Text
id pubmed-3002414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30024142010-12-23 Automated Digital Image Analysis (TrichoScan®) for Human Hair Growth Analysis: Ease versus Errors Saraogi, Punit P Dhurat, Rachita S Int J Trichology Original Article BACKGROUND: TrichoScan(®) is considered to be time-saving, easy to perform and consistent for quantifying hair loss/growth. Conflicting results of our study lead us to closely observe the image analysis, and certain repeated errors in the detection of hair were highlighted. AIMS: To assess the utility of TrichoScan in quantification of diffuse hair loss in males with androgenetic alopecia (AGA) and females with diffuse telogen hair loss, with regard to total hair density (THD), telogen and vellus hair percentages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TrichoScan procedure was performed on 77 cases and 20 controls. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In the cases, THD decreased with increasing severity of alopecia. Surprisingly, more than 85% of the healthy volunteers had an unexplained abnormal telogen hair percentage of more than 20. Also, the telogen hair percentages were not significantly different between cases and controls. Also, 65% of the patients with advanced thinning of hair did not have the expected elevation of vellus hair percentages on TrichoScan evaluation. Multiple errors were highlighted in hair detection by the software. Errors were noted at the exit points of follicular ostia, at places where hair strand thickness was not uniform throughout its length, where there was crossing, overlapping of the neighboring strands, and when more than one hair emerged from a single ostium. CONCLUSION: TrichoScan is promoted as a validated and precise tool for measurement of hair growth parameters. Under certain conditions, it may seem suitable for clinical trials evaluating treatment response. We provide evidence that this is an overstatement. This study concludes that TrichoScan-analyzed anagen/telogen hair detection is not optimal; moreover, there is overestimation of THD and the vellus hair percentage does not correlate with clinical severity of alopecia. The current form of TrichoScan, though easy to use, is error-prone and awaits refinement. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3002414/ /pubmed/21188016 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7753.66905 Text en © International Journal of Trichology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Saraogi, Punit P
Dhurat, Rachita S
Automated Digital Image Analysis (TrichoScan®) for Human Hair Growth Analysis: Ease versus Errors
title Automated Digital Image Analysis (TrichoScan®) for Human Hair Growth Analysis: Ease versus Errors
title_full Automated Digital Image Analysis (TrichoScan®) for Human Hair Growth Analysis: Ease versus Errors
title_fullStr Automated Digital Image Analysis (TrichoScan®) for Human Hair Growth Analysis: Ease versus Errors
title_full_unstemmed Automated Digital Image Analysis (TrichoScan®) for Human Hair Growth Analysis: Ease versus Errors
title_short Automated Digital Image Analysis (TrichoScan®) for Human Hair Growth Analysis: Ease versus Errors
title_sort automated digital image analysis (trichoscan®) for human hair growth analysis: ease versus errors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3002414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21188016
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7753.66905
work_keys_str_mv AT saraogipunitp automateddigitalimageanalysistrichoscanforhumanhairgrowthanalysiseaseversuserrors
AT dhuratrachitas automateddigitalimageanalysistrichoscanforhumanhairgrowthanalysiseaseversuserrors