Cargando…

Fresh or frozen? Classifying ‘spare’ embryos for donation to human embryonic stem cell research

United Kingdom (UK) funding to build human embryonic stem cell (hESC) derivation labs within assisted conception units (ACU) was intended to facilitate the ‘In-vitro fertilisation (IVF)-stem cell interface’, including the flow of fresh ‘spare’ embryos to stem cell labs. However, in the three sites r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ehrich, Kathryn, Williams, Clare, Farsides, Bobbie
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3003156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21071129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.045
_version_ 1782193827647324160
author Ehrich, Kathryn
Williams, Clare
Farsides, Bobbie
author_facet Ehrich, Kathryn
Williams, Clare
Farsides, Bobbie
author_sort Ehrich, Kathryn
collection PubMed
description United Kingdom (UK) funding to build human embryonic stem cell (hESC) derivation labs within assisted conception units (ACU) was intended to facilitate the ‘In-vitro fertilisation (IVF)-stem cell interface’, including the flow of fresh ‘spare’ embryos to stem cell labs. However, in the three sites reported on here, which received this funding, most of the embryos used for hESC research came from long term cryopreservation storage and/or outside clinics. In this paper we explore some of the clinical, technical, social and ethical factors that might help to explain this situation. We report from our qualitative study of the ethical frameworks for approaching women/couples for donation of embryos to stem cell research. Members of staff took part in 44 interviews and six ethics discussion groups held at our study sites between February 2008 and October 2009. We focus here on their articulations of social and ethical, as well as scientific, dimensions in the contingent classification of ‘spare’ embryos, entailing uncertainty, fluidity and naturalisation in classifying work. Social and ethical factors include acknowledging and responding to uncertainty in classifying embryos; retaining ‘fluidity’ in the grading system to give embryos ‘every chance’; tensions between standardisation and variation in enacting a ‘fair’ grading system; enhancement of patient choice and control, and prevention of regret; and incorporation of patients’ values in construction of ethically acceptable embryo ‘spareness’ (‘frozen’ embryos, and embryos determined through preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to be genetically ‘affected’). We argue that the success of the ‘built moral environment’ of ACU with adjoining stem cell laboratories building projects intended to facilitate the ‘IVF-stem cell interface’ may depend not only on architecture, but also on the part such social and ethical factors play in configuration of embryos as particular kinds of moral work objects.
format Text
id pubmed-3003156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Pergamon
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30031562011-01-24 Fresh or frozen? Classifying ‘spare’ embryos for donation to human embryonic stem cell research Ehrich, Kathryn Williams, Clare Farsides, Bobbie Soc Sci Med Article United Kingdom (UK) funding to build human embryonic stem cell (hESC) derivation labs within assisted conception units (ACU) was intended to facilitate the ‘In-vitro fertilisation (IVF)-stem cell interface’, including the flow of fresh ‘spare’ embryos to stem cell labs. However, in the three sites reported on here, which received this funding, most of the embryos used for hESC research came from long term cryopreservation storage and/or outside clinics. In this paper we explore some of the clinical, technical, social and ethical factors that might help to explain this situation. We report from our qualitative study of the ethical frameworks for approaching women/couples for donation of embryos to stem cell research. Members of staff took part in 44 interviews and six ethics discussion groups held at our study sites between February 2008 and October 2009. We focus here on their articulations of social and ethical, as well as scientific, dimensions in the contingent classification of ‘spare’ embryos, entailing uncertainty, fluidity and naturalisation in classifying work. Social and ethical factors include acknowledging and responding to uncertainty in classifying embryos; retaining ‘fluidity’ in the grading system to give embryos ‘every chance’; tensions between standardisation and variation in enacting a ‘fair’ grading system; enhancement of patient choice and control, and prevention of regret; and incorporation of patients’ values in construction of ethically acceptable embryo ‘spareness’ (‘frozen’ embryos, and embryos determined through preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to be genetically ‘affected’). We argue that the success of the ‘built moral environment’ of ACU with adjoining stem cell laboratories building projects intended to facilitate the ‘IVF-stem cell interface’ may depend not only on architecture, but also on the part such social and ethical factors play in configuration of embryos as particular kinds of moral work objects. Pergamon 2010-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3003156/ /pubmed/21071129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.045 Text en © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Ehrich, Kathryn
Williams, Clare
Farsides, Bobbie
Fresh or frozen? Classifying ‘spare’ embryos for donation to human embryonic stem cell research
title Fresh or frozen? Classifying ‘spare’ embryos for donation to human embryonic stem cell research
title_full Fresh or frozen? Classifying ‘spare’ embryos for donation to human embryonic stem cell research
title_fullStr Fresh or frozen? Classifying ‘spare’ embryos for donation to human embryonic stem cell research
title_full_unstemmed Fresh or frozen? Classifying ‘spare’ embryos for donation to human embryonic stem cell research
title_short Fresh or frozen? Classifying ‘spare’ embryos for donation to human embryonic stem cell research
title_sort fresh or frozen? classifying ‘spare’ embryos for donation to human embryonic stem cell research
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3003156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21071129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.045
work_keys_str_mv AT ehrichkathryn freshorfrozenclassifyingspareembryosfordonationtohumanembryonicstemcellresearch
AT williamsclare freshorfrozenclassifyingspareembryosfordonationtohumanembryonicstemcellresearch
AT farsidesbobbie freshorfrozenclassifyingspareembryosfordonationtohumanembryonicstemcellresearch