Cargando…

Job satisfaction and motivation of health workers in public and private sectors: cross-sectional analysis from two Indian states

BACKGROUND: Ensuring health worker job satisfaction and motivation are important if health workers are to be retained and effectively deliver health services in many developing countries, whether they work in the public or private sector. The objectives of the paper are to identify important aspects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peters, David H, Chakraborty, Subrata, Mahapatra, Prasanta, Steinhardt, Laura
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3003185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21108833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-8-27
_version_ 1782193834584702976
author Peters, David H
Chakraborty, Subrata
Mahapatra, Prasanta
Steinhardt, Laura
author_facet Peters, David H
Chakraborty, Subrata
Mahapatra, Prasanta
Steinhardt, Laura
author_sort Peters, David H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ensuring health worker job satisfaction and motivation are important if health workers are to be retained and effectively deliver health services in many developing countries, whether they work in the public or private sector. The objectives of the paper are to identify important aspects of health worker satisfaction and motivation in two Indian states working in public and private sectors. METHODS: Cross-sectional surveys of 1916 public and private sector health workers in Andhra Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh, India, were conducted using a standardized instrument to identify health workers' satisfaction with key work factors related to motivation. Ratings were compared with how important health workers consider these factors. RESULTS: There was high variability in the ratings for areas of satisfaction and motivation across the different practice settings, but there were also commonalities. Four groups of factors were identified, with those relating to job content and work environment viewed as the most important characteristics of the ideal job, and rated higher than a good income. In both states, public sector health workers rated "good employment benefits" as significantly more important than private sector workers, as well as a "superior who recognizes work". There were large differences in whether these factors were considered present on the job, particularly between public and private sector health workers in Uttar Pradesh, where the public sector fared consistently lower (P < 0.01). Discordance between what motivational factors health workers considered important and their perceptions of actual presence of these factors were also highest in Uttar Pradesh in the public sector, where all 17 items had greater discordance for public sector workers than for workers in the private sector (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There are common areas of health worker motivation that should be considered by managers and policy makers, particularly the importance of non-financial motivators such as working environment and skill development opportunities. But managers also need to focus on the importance of locally assessing conditions and managing incentives to ensure health workers are motivated in their work.
format Text
id pubmed-3003185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30031852011-01-06 Job satisfaction and motivation of health workers in public and private sectors: cross-sectional analysis from two Indian states Peters, David H Chakraborty, Subrata Mahapatra, Prasanta Steinhardt, Laura Hum Resour Health Research BACKGROUND: Ensuring health worker job satisfaction and motivation are important if health workers are to be retained and effectively deliver health services in many developing countries, whether they work in the public or private sector. The objectives of the paper are to identify important aspects of health worker satisfaction and motivation in two Indian states working in public and private sectors. METHODS: Cross-sectional surveys of 1916 public and private sector health workers in Andhra Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh, India, were conducted using a standardized instrument to identify health workers' satisfaction with key work factors related to motivation. Ratings were compared with how important health workers consider these factors. RESULTS: There was high variability in the ratings for areas of satisfaction and motivation across the different practice settings, but there were also commonalities. Four groups of factors were identified, with those relating to job content and work environment viewed as the most important characteristics of the ideal job, and rated higher than a good income. In both states, public sector health workers rated "good employment benefits" as significantly more important than private sector workers, as well as a "superior who recognizes work". There were large differences in whether these factors were considered present on the job, particularly between public and private sector health workers in Uttar Pradesh, where the public sector fared consistently lower (P < 0.01). Discordance between what motivational factors health workers considered important and their perceptions of actual presence of these factors were also highest in Uttar Pradesh in the public sector, where all 17 items had greater discordance for public sector workers than for workers in the private sector (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There are common areas of health worker motivation that should be considered by managers and policy makers, particularly the importance of non-financial motivators such as working environment and skill development opportunities. But managers also need to focus on the importance of locally assessing conditions and managing incentives to ensure health workers are motivated in their work. BioMed Central 2010-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3003185/ /pubmed/21108833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-8-27 Text en Copyright ©2010 Peters et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Peters, David H
Chakraborty, Subrata
Mahapatra, Prasanta
Steinhardt, Laura
Job satisfaction and motivation of health workers in public and private sectors: cross-sectional analysis from two Indian states
title Job satisfaction and motivation of health workers in public and private sectors: cross-sectional analysis from two Indian states
title_full Job satisfaction and motivation of health workers in public and private sectors: cross-sectional analysis from two Indian states
title_fullStr Job satisfaction and motivation of health workers in public and private sectors: cross-sectional analysis from two Indian states
title_full_unstemmed Job satisfaction and motivation of health workers in public and private sectors: cross-sectional analysis from two Indian states
title_short Job satisfaction and motivation of health workers in public and private sectors: cross-sectional analysis from two Indian states
title_sort job satisfaction and motivation of health workers in public and private sectors: cross-sectional analysis from two indian states
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3003185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21108833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-8-27
work_keys_str_mv AT petersdavidh jobsatisfactionandmotivationofhealthworkersinpublicandprivatesectorscrosssectionalanalysisfromtwoindianstates
AT chakrabortysubrata jobsatisfactionandmotivationofhealthworkersinpublicandprivatesectorscrosssectionalanalysisfromtwoindianstates
AT mahapatraprasanta jobsatisfactionandmotivationofhealthworkersinpublicandprivatesectorscrosssectionalanalysisfromtwoindianstates
AT steinhardtlaura jobsatisfactionandmotivationofhealthworkersinpublicandprivatesectorscrosssectionalanalysisfromtwoindianstates