Cargando…
Managing Disagreement: A Defense of “Regime Bias”
Stein Ringen’s theory of democratic purpose cannot do the work expected of it. Ringen’s own criteria oscillate between being too vague to be useful (i.e. “freedom”) or, when specified more fully, conflicting, so that almost all democracies will seem to be potentially at cross-purposes with themselve...
Autor principal: | Sabl, Andrew |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3003786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21258438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9383-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies
por: Lijphart, Arend
Publicado: (2010) -
Scaling and Disagreements: Bias, Noise, and Ambiguity
por: Uma, Alexandra, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Shrug Ambivalence and Disagreement; Search Commonalities in Psychiatric Phenomena(**)
por: Singh, Ajai R.
Publicado: (2014) -
Deep Disagreement (Part 2): Epistemology of Deep Disagreement
por: Ranalli, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Deep Disagreement (Part 1): Theories of Deep Disagreement
por: Ranalli, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2022)